|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Simple question about SR paradox
On May 24, 9:41 am, Mike Fontenot wrote:
On 05/23/2011 07:26 AM, Marc Fleury wrote: Just by symmetry of the problem, the proposition seems non-sensical to me. Get yourself a copy of Einstein's little book "Relativity - The Special and General Theory" by Crown publishers. CAREFULLY read just the special relativity part (including the derivation of the Lorentz equations, in the appendix). Then read it again. Maybe even a third time. Don't quit until you thoroughly understand EVERYTHING he said. Oh, isn’t that the cookbook on mathemaGics where Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was able to start with two identical equations equating zero with zero and pulled out half of the Lorentz transform out of these two equations? shrug As Yours Truly has said many times over, the feat was merely mathemaGics only for the kindergarten kids. However, the self-styled physicists seem to be ever so bedazzled by the mathemaGic trick performed by Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. shrug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Simple question about SR paradox
Le 24/05/11 19:55, Koobee Wublee a écrit :
Oh, isn’t that the cookbook on mathemaGics where Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was able to start with two identical equations equating zero with zero and pulled out half of the Lorentz transform out of these two equations?shrug Who are you? What are YOUR credentials to insult Einstein (nothing less)? What are YOUR contributions to physics? You do not even dare to write under your own name. Anonymous cowards like you are half a dime the dozen here in Usenet. Go back to your hole now, and take your meds. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Simple question about SR paradox
Le 24/05/11 20:05, jacob navia a écrit :
Le 24/05/11 19:55, Koobee Wublee a écrit : Oh, isn’t that the cookbook on mathemaGics where Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was able to start with two identical equations equating zero with zero and pulled out half of the Lorentz transform out of these two equations?shrug Who are you? What are YOUR credentials to insult Einstein (nothing less)? What are YOUR contributions to physics? You do not even dare to write under your own name. Anonymous cowards like you are half a dime the dozen here in Usenet. Go back to your hole now, and take your meds. P.S. And yes, sorry, I forgot: SHRUG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Simple question about SR paradox
On May 24, 11:05 am, jacob navia wrote:
Le 24/05/11 19:55, Koobee Wublee a crit : Oh, isn’t that the cookbook on mathemaGics where Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was able to start with two identical equations equating zero with zero and pulled out half of the Lorentz transform out of these two equations? shrug Who are you? Koobee Wublee, Yours Truly. Is it really that difficult to figure it out? shrug What are YOUR credentials to insult Einstein (nothing less)? None of your business. shrug What are YOUR contributions to physics? Demystification. shrug You do not even dare to write under your own name. Anonymous cowards like you are half a dime the dozen here in Usenet. Go back to your hole now, and take your meds. P.S. And yes, sorry, I forgot: SHRUG Are you done with personal insults? If so, Yours Truly would like to remind you that Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was indeed a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar, and you have been worshipping a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. Get over with it. shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simple question about SR paradox | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 68 | May 26th 11 07:33 PM |
Simple question | Alexander Naismith | Misc | 5 | June 4th 04 02:03 PM |
Very simple question | Earth Resident | Science | 7 | October 8th 03 12:09 AM |
FW: Simple Question | Steve Willner | Research | 13 | July 11th 03 10:46 PM |
FW: Simple Question | Richard S. Sternberg | Research | 0 | July 7th 03 06:14 PM |