|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
This was the first year since record keeping began in 1870 that
Indianapolis made it through the entire year without reaching 90F even once. ;-) And still managed to average 1 F above normal for the year. What is normal for the year? |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
There is an implicit assumption (not yet justified) that climate change
(especially 'global warming') is necessarily bad. Shortly after the end of the last glaciation there was a period in which the globe was approximately 5° C warmer than it is now and sea levels were several meters higher. You exaggerate obsolete data. Your sea level claims are just plain wrong too. http://www.pages.unibe.ch/shighlight...e03/davis.html How do you know that he is exaggerating obsolete data? You know the truth? Pftttt! Human population during this time was very low. What does that have to do with anything? |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
There is an implicit assumption (not yet justified) that climate change
(especially 'global warming') is necessarily bad. Since we've adapted our civilization to the current climate any change will be bad. Why? Would we not adapt to change? Yuo seem to be saying that we have done so in the past. Are todays sea levels optimum? Perhaps not, but moving all port cities if it changes is going to be horribly expensive. It is the expense that worris you? Reducing C02 would also be expensive, and have an impact sooner. What about flood plains located just about sea level. What will people who live there do if sea levels rise? They will do like the Dutch or the Venetians, or they will migrate. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
In article , =20
says... This was the first year since record keeping began in 1870 that=20 Indianapolis made it through the entire year without reaching 90F even once. ;-) And still managed to average 1 F above normal for the year. =20 What is normal for the year?=20 =20 =20 =20 52.5 F. You can get all of the climate data for Indianapolis from the local=20 weather service office web site: http://www.crh.noaa.gov/ind/cli.php --=20 Harold Brooks hebrooks87 hotmail.com |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
"Harold Brooks" wrote in message t... In article , says... This was the first year since record keeping began in 1870 that Indianapolis made it through the entire year without reaching 90F even once. ;-) And still managed to average 1 F above normal for the year. What is normal for the year? 52.5 F. That is an average over what period? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
tadchem wrote:
There is an implicit assumption (not yet justified) that climate change (especially 'global warming') is necessarily bad. Global warming (CO2) may mitigate snowball Earth. Contrary to expectation, ocean warming preceded global warming. http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache...a ir%22&hl=en or http://climateark.org/articles/2000/1st/stfindal.htm There are 75000 km of midocean ridges capable of hydrothermal venting (400C) as exemplified by the Arctic ridge: http://www.mpg.de/english/illustrati...718/index.html Warmer oceans generate more clouds and snow which reflect sunlight and lead to global cooling which, if unchecked, leads to snowball Earth. John Curtis |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"tadchem" wrote in message oups.com... Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote: January 26, 2005 http://www.nature.com/news/2005/0501...050124-10.html http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6934 http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=7440023 http://www.physorg.com/news2831.html http://www.climateprediction.net Thomas Lee Elifritz http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net ...There is an implicit assumption (not yet justified) that climate change ...(especially 'global warming') is necessarily bad. I don't think this is assumed, it is hypothesized and supported with evidence and model predictions. ...Shortly after the end of the last glaciation there was a period in ...which the globe was approximately 5° C warmer than it is now and sea ...levels were several meters higher. ... ...It is known to anthropologists and archaeologists as the "Holocene ...thermal optimum" and was also a time of much greater biomass, the ...Sahara grasslands, and much larger forests. Agriculture flourished, ...people built cities and learned to write, and trading became ...commonplace. The Stone age was supplanted by the Dawn of Civilization. One *very* sgnificant factor you are ignoring is the speed of change. If the change in climate is too sudden, it has a drastic effect on all living organisms. This has been observed at many times in geological history. Also, the speed of recovery, and yes, perhaps tremendous improvement (but whatever measure you might choose) is *very* slow by human standards, ie millions of years, (rather longer than the term of any political leader anyway). ...All [flourishing, building, dawning] without fossil fuel consumption... Can you clarify what you mean by this comment? ...When circumstances do not change, adaptation ceases. When adaptation ...ceases, species stagnate and become more vulnerable to change. ...Change is inevitable. Adapt or die. I agree. But this is true on geological timescales, not on the scale of decades. -- Coby Beck (remove #\Space "coby 101 @ big pond . com") |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Harold Brooks" wrote in message t... In article , says... "Mike Rhino" wrote in message news "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote: [snip crap] Tell it to New England. There is a difference between amount of snow and temperature. Lots of snow does not contradict global warming. It's just one place and one week. The overall average temperature could still go up. This was the first year since record keeping began in 1870 that Indianapolis made it through the entire year without reaching 90F even once. ;-) And still managed to average 1 F above normal for the year. -- Harold Brooks hebrooks87 hotmail.com If that's Global Warming I'm all for it. ;-) |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
In article , =20
says... =20 "Harold Brooks" wrote in message=20 t... In article , says... This was the first year since record keeping began in 1870 that Indianapolis made it through the entire year without reaching 90F even once. ;-) And still managed to average 1 F above normal for the year. What is normal for the year? =20 52.5 F. =20 That is an average over what period?=20 1971-2000. The standard averaging period is the last 30 years ending in=20 0. Harold --=20 Harold Brooks hebrooks87 hotmail.com |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
52.5 F.
That is an average over what period? 1971-2000. The standard averaging period is the last 30 years ending in 0. So based on a record of 30 years, you can say what is normal? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CO2 and global warming | freddo411 | Astronomy Misc | 314 | October 20th 04 09:56 PM |
CO2 and global warming | freddo411 | Policy | 319 | October 20th 04 09:56 PM |
global warming could trigger an ice age at any time | Ian Beardsley | Astronomy Misc | 3 | February 24th 04 10:34 AM |