|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/92 Published August 20, 2012 | Physics 5, 92 (2012) | DOI: 10.1103/Physics.5.92 A proposed explanation for puzzling features on the Moon involving small-scale magnetic fields has now been verified with a scaled-down version in the lab. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
On Aug 20, 7:07*pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
Published August 20, 2012 *| *Physics 5, 92 (2012) *| *DOI: 10.1103/Physics.5.92 A proposed explanation for puzzling features on the Moon involving small-scale magnetic fields has now been verified with a scaled-down version in the lab. Empiricists are always puzzled and perplexed yet haven't enough sense to apply order and cohesion to observations - the surface crust of the Earth almost dictates the internal fluid dynamics acting on the crust in terms of differential rotation and from there into such things as the Earth's magnetic field if analogies to toroidal flow care applied loosely.There just doesn't seem to be people who can actually talk about the component parts by taking the widest view possible and taking account of details as the subject matter becomes more focused. You have the geology community with their thermal 'convection cells' which interferes with the discussion on the Earth's 26 mile spherical deviation and its magnetic field.There is a possibility of differential rotation between different internal compositions which would supply toroidal flow to the low viscosity viscous composition in contact with the crust notwithstanding it demarcates the multitude of zonal bands that create the spherical deviation while acting to create and destroy the oceanic crust. Because paid researchers have such a poor understanding of the dimensions attached to the rotational characteristics of the planet,everyone has to suffer the childish and nonsensical thermal driven 'convection cells' in order to heap praise on the late 17th century powdered wigs who got it wrong - https://www.google.com/search?num=10...ac.9tHViCy76mk For goodness sake,apart from the hopelessly indoctrinated,adults are needed to consider the genuine link between plate tectonics,the Earth's magnetic field,the shape of the planet and all other topics which come under the umbrella of a rotating planet and it would make a nice change in this forum which a river of mediocrity and headache inducing noise is flowing presently.. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
On Aug 20, 7:39*pm, oriel36 wrote:
On Aug 20, 7:07*pm, Sam Wormley wrote: Published August 20, 2012 *| *Physics 5, 92 (2012) *| *DOI: 10.1103/Physics.5.92 A proposed explanation for puzzling features on the Moon involving small-scale magnetic fields has now been verified with a scaled-down version in the lab. Empiricists are always puzzled and perplexed yet haven't enough sense to apply order and cohesion to observations - the surface crust of the Earth almost dictates the internal fluid dynamics acting on the crust in terms of differential rotation and from there into such things as the Earth's magnetic field if analogies to toroidal flow care applied loosely.There just doesn't seem to be people who can actually talk about the component parts by taking the widest view possible and taking account of details as the subject matter becomes more focused. You have the geology community with their thermal 'convection cells' which interferes with the discussion on the Earth's *26 mile spherical deviation and its magnetic field.There is a possibility of differential rotation between different internal compositions which would supply toroidal flow to the low viscosity viscous composition in contact with the crust notwithstanding it demarcates the multitude of zonal bands that create the spherical deviation while acting to create and destroy the oceanic crust. Because paid researchers have such a poor understanding of the dimensions attached to the rotational characteristics of the planet,everyone has to suffer the childish and nonsensical thermal driven 'convection cells' in order to heap praise on the late 17th century powdered wigs who got it wrong - https://www.google.com/search?num=10...bm=isch&source... For goodness sake,apart from the hopelessly indoctrinated,adults are needed to consider the genuine link between plate tectonics,the Earth's magnetic field,the shape of the planet and all other topics which come under the umbrella of a rotating planet and it would make a nice change in this forum which a river of mediocrity and headache inducing noise is flowing presently.. Great !,wonderful ! - 5000 years of Western science and not a single individual can manage to affirm that the Earth turns once in 24 hours as a point of departure for discussing every conceivable topic relating to terrestrial sciences and its connection to the celestial arena. How can this not be a tragedy ?,this is not human rights issue that children are not taught the basic dimensions of the planet which interlinks 15 degrees/1 hour/1037.5 miles at the equator,this is common sense. If there is a great ignominy I do not know it,I could understand it if such things as linking planetary shape,crustal dynamics and the planet magnetic field using the internal fluid dynamics was in anyway dull and dreary and I partly understand the limits people choose to place on themselves so as not to see the wider picture but it is the willful avoidance of responsibility that can be shocking sometimes and especially people who call it their job. This is no a low point in human endeavor - in a no point. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
On Aug 21, 12:25*am, oriel36 wrote:
On Aug 20, 7:39*pm, oriel36 wrote: On Aug 20, 7:07*pm, Sam Wormley wrote: Published August 20, 2012 *| *Physics 5, 92 (2012) *| *DOI: 10.1103/Physics.5.92 A proposed explanation for puzzling features on the Moon involving small-scale magnetic fields has now been verified with a scaled-down version in the lab. Empiricists are always puzzled and perplexed yet haven't enough sense to apply order and cohesion to observations - the surface crust of the Earth almost dictates the internal fluid dynamics acting on the crust in terms of differential rotation and from there into such things as the Earth's magnetic field if analogies to toroidal flow care applied loosely.There just doesn't seem to be people who can actually talk about the component parts by taking the widest view possible and taking account of details as the subject matter becomes more focused. You have the geology community with their thermal 'convection cells' which interferes with the discussion on the Earth's *26 mile spherical deviation and its magnetic field.There is a possibility of differential rotation between different internal compositions which would supply toroidal flow to the low viscosity viscous composition in contact with the crust notwithstanding it demarcates the multitude of zonal bands that create the spherical deviation while acting to create and destroy the oceanic crust. Because paid researchers have such a poor understanding of the dimensions attached to the rotational characteristics of the planet,everyone has to suffer the childish and nonsensical thermal driven 'convection cells' in order to heap praise on the late 17th century powdered wigs who got it wrong - https://www.google.com/search?num=10...bm=isch&source... For goodness sake,apart from the hopelessly indoctrinated,adults are needed to consider the genuine link between plate tectonics,the Earth's magnetic field,the shape of the planet and all other topics which come under the umbrella of a rotating planet and it would make a nice change in this forum which a river of mediocrity and headache inducing noise is flowing presently.. Great !,wonderful ! - 5000 years of Western science and not a single individual can manage to affirm that the Earth turns once in 24 hours as a point of departure for discussing every conceivable topic relating to terrestrial sciences and its connection to the celestial arena. How can this not be a tragedy ?,this is not human rights issue that children are not taught the basic dimensions of the planet which interlinks 15 degrees/1 hour/1037.5 miles at the equator,this is common sense. If there is a great ignominy I do not know it,I could understand it if such things as linking *planetary shape,crustal dynamics and the planet magnetic field using the internal fluid dynamics was in anyway dull and dreary and I partly understand the limits people choose to place on themselves so as not to see the wider picture but it is the willful avoidance of responsibility that can be shocking sometimes and especially people who call it their job. This is no a low point in human endeavor - in a no point. I guess I express my exasperation without proofreading or rereading what I wrote and hands up,no excuses. I meant that the inability to teach students that the Earth turns once in 24 hours is not a low point in human endeavor - it is that there is no point to human endeavor once a stance like that is taken. Venus does not have a magnetic shield in a way the Earth does for much the same reason the Earth has a 26 mile spherical deviation and Venus hasn't or why the Earth has a very active surface crust whereas Venus displays volcanic activity.Even the recent data based on CME's as they strike Venus contributes to the understanding of the rotational mechanism behind a planet's magnetic field therefore this area of study can be added into the mix in using planetary comparisons to extract a common mechanism- http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/6...-orig_full.jpg They are now talking of a geological study of Mars and sending another vehicle up there yet the current explanation they have for the clues left on the surface crust of the Earth is childish where none of the parts fit together for proposing thermal 'convection cells' as a mechanism for plate tectonics gets in the way of an explanation for the spherical deviation of the planet and a magnetic field. This was never about contending with the spectacular errors inherited from the late 17th century even though it does demonstrate how catastrophic the entrenched errors are to the study of terrestrial effects which connect plate tectonics to the spherical shape of the planet and the magnetic shield and from there into more complex issue which graft in orbital elements including climate.Rather than try to steal my work,and mangle it like they are now doing with rotation and plate tectonics,they should discuss these matters openly as though the old errors never mattered and just get on with moving astronomy and the terrestrial sciences forward. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
On 20 Aug., 19:07, Sam Wormley wrote:
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features * *http://physics.aps.org/articles/v5/92 Published August 20, 2012 *| *Physics 5, 92 (2012) *| *DOI: 10.1103/Physics.5.92 A proposed explanation for puzzling features on the Moon involving small-scale magnetic fields has now been verified with a scaled-down version in the lab. Without wishing to undermine the importance of this work... Shouldn't we be going to the moon ASAP to find the buried, alien obelisks? ;-) More seriously (?) there must be some metallic asteroids or remnants close to the surface. So why isn't this an obvious clue to the source of the local magnetism? Why is it considered another "mystery?" (to be pored over by theoreticians) Perhaps they are the remnants of an ancient, permanent magnet shield from a crashed, alien ship? Or ships. If nothing else, finding the source of the magnetism may offer clues to improved magnetic materials. Presumably the magnetic anomalies must be extremely long lived? Otherwise there would (or could) be no surface bleaching. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
-- "Chris.B" wrote in message Dib,dib,dib. Dob,dob,dob. Naturally he is the leader of the total ****wits. -- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
On Tuesday, August 21, 2012 1:57:33 PM UTC+2, Lord Androloses, Zeroth, Earl of Mudway finally came out of the closet:
"Naturally I am the leader of the total ****wits." Whatever. I see you've already had a thrashing in the religiooze thread. Ouch! That must smart! A loser is always easy to identify. Becomes ever more inarticulate as he gets angrier. Given to gutter language. Increasingly desperate attempts to copy and paste from Wiki to prove a point which was never even raised. Keeps digging. Pointless and unimaginative repetition. Recognise anyone? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Focus: Magnetic Fields Explain Lunar Surface Features
-- "Chris.B" wrote in message Dib,dib,dib. Dob,dob,dob. Naturally he is the leader of the total ****wits. -- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What if (on magnetic fields) | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 15 | August 4th 09 10:25 PM |
One day, we might be able to “ see ” magnetic fields. | _@Jeff_Relf.Seattle.inValid | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 24th 09 09:45 PM |
Magnetic fields | MS | Misc | 0 | April 27th 07 11:41 AM |
Unusal Martian Surface Features,Etc. | In Fo | UK Astronomy | 4 | September 27th 06 07:12 AM |
Astrophysicists Focus on Sun's Magnetic Fields | Mad Scientist | Misc | 8 | October 7th 04 07:50 AM |