Bill Sheppard - You've got to see this!

Hey Bill!

There is someone by the name of Joseph A. Tackett over on
sci.physics.relativity who is stealing your ideas in a post titled "Matter
Consumes Space; hence, Gravity". His arguments are remarkably similar to
your own, right down to the analogies!!!

So, the question is ...

Is he your sock-puppet or are you his???

John wrote,

There is someone by the name of
Joseph A. Tackett over on
sci.physics.relativity who is stealing your ideas in a post titled
"Matter Consumes
Space; hence, Gravity". His arguments
are remarkably similar to your own,
right down to the analogies!!!

So, the question is ...
Is he your sock-puppet or are you his???

Never heard of the dude, John. Sounds like he is simply an observer of
the obvious.
Likewise the other people in Lindner's 'clearinghouse' on
the spatial-flow model of gravity have independntly deduced the same
exact same thing. No big deal. Unification of gravity, anyone? oc

Unification of gravity, anyone?

No, just the unification of netloons.

Clear Skies

Chuck Taylor
Do you observe the moon?
Try the Lunar Observing Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/

************************************

Hi oc In New theories news group they have been discussing 'PUSH
GRAVITY" Bert

"CLT" not@thisaddress wrote in message
...
Unification of gravity, anyone?

No, just the unification of netloons.

Clear Skies

Chuck Taylor
Do you observe the moon?
Try the Lunar Observing Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lunar-observing/

************************************



G

Darla

Bert wrote,

In New theories news group they have
been discussing 'PUSH GRAVITY"

Yeah, that's Van Flandern's outfit. They clearly understand gravity to
be a push force rather than an 'attraction'. But they're still in the
void-space mode, and reject the flowing-space mechanism. Their biggest
squawk seems to be the roach motel issue of "where does it go?". oc
=A0