|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Henry Spencer wrote: In article , Alan Anderson wrote: That gives you attitude fixes, but it doesn't determine location on the Moon unless you either have some closer reference (like Earth) as well, or can measure the direction of the local vertical accurately. Local vertical is easy: it's *down*. It's easy only if your sensor is absolutely motionless during the measurement period. This is not that easy to achieve aboard vehicles, which are one of the major applications of such navigation devices. Also, when you start wanting to get seriously accurate, you need a gravity model of the Moon to determine the relationship between (so to speak) local gravity vertical and local geometric vertical. I think for lunar vehicles, a combination of inertial gyros, distance measurement, and terrain contour mapping will be fine and cheap. The Terrain Contour Mapping will be easy for a powerful enough computer and some good optics. An alternative is you shine a light to L1, and the L1 station tells you where you are. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CEV PDQ | Scott Lowther | History | 829 | June 12th 05 07:17 PM |
CEV PDQ | Scott Lowther | Policy | 577 | May 27th 05 10:11 PM |
Gravity as Falling Space | Henry Haapalainen | Science | 1 | September 4th 04 04:08 PM |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
President Bush Announces New Vision for Space Exploration Program(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 14th 04 09:49 PM |