|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
This is slightly off topic, but I do see people talking about commercial
space in here. From what I can tell, the group launching the SpaceLoft XL ran into a problem similar to mine, instability at high Mach numbers resulting in a corkscrewing or coning motion during the burn (and eventual structural failure). What I thought was interesting is that around the same time the SpaceLoft XL crashed, an amateur named Gene Nowaczyk successfully launched an 8" diameter rocket on a Q motor reaching about 93,000. I was not there but this is what I've been told by people who were there. Granted, it's not a flight into space but I do see a day when a small numbers of amateurs will be able to reach above the 62 mile number on a regular basis. C. Newport |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 10:28:02 -0500, C. Newport wrote
(in article ): What I thought was interesting is that around the same time the SpaceLoft XL crashed, an amateur named Gene Nowaczyk successfully launched an 8" diameter rocket on a Q motor reaching about 93,000. So how many Estes D engines is that equivalent to? ;-) -- Herb Schaltegger "You can run on for a long time . . . sooner or later, God'll cut you down." - Johnny Cash http://www.angryherb.net |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
One could also think of the following two points:
1. Center of gravity changes as the Solid fuel is used up, (this may have contrib. to the flight profile change). 2. Structure reinforcement may be needed for the highest point of dynamic pressure, (Check some of the open source calc programs, to give design requirements). Hope this helps you out. My Space Club Kids are building a 1:48th Scale Saturn V right now, (Scratch design has been a nightmare). I will not let them work with the high power stuff, (But we wish you good luck, and God Speed). Carl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
wrote: Hope this helps you out. My Space Club Kids are building a 1:48th Scale Saturn V right now, (Scratch design has been a nightmare). Could be worse, could be an N-1; that makes a Saturn V look simple in design by comparison. Did you use Evergreen prescribed sheet styrene for the corrugated sections? http://www.evergreenscalemodels.com/ There square tile makes great solar cell arrays. Pat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
OK, now I've got to figure this out. Accordoing to Estes, a D motor is a
maximum of 20 newton-seconds. A Q motor is anywhere from 81,920 n-s to 163,840 n-s. Consequently, you would need anywhere from 4,096 to 8,192 Estes D motors to equal the output of Gene's Q motor. I feel good now C. Newport |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
You are right Pat, I have a display model of the N-1. A flight version
would diff. be a nightmare! The guy that just calc'd the # of "D" engines gets a star. Could you imagine trying to get that many of them to fire at once? Prob. have as much luck as the Red's had with the N-1, (LOL). The N-1 was a wild confg.. It would have been cool to see it get to orbit. My Fav. Russian offering is the Energia. That was a hell of a rocket an proved itself in (2) flights. The idea of refurbing the liq. boosters was the right track, for a heavy lift vehicle. The proton is neat too, (but the Energia was the cats meow!)! Carl P.S. If anyone wants a card stock model of the N-1, Energia, or Proton, mail me off group. Not simple builds, (but worth your time). They are really cool display models, (and good luck if you want to modify for flight). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
On 3 Oct 2006 15:28:10 -0700, wrote:
You are right Pat, I have a display model of the N-1. A flight version would diff. be a nightmare! The guy that just calc'd the # of "D" engines gets a star. Could you imagine trying to get that many of them to fire at once? http://www.moonrace2001.org/n1_launch.shtml http://www.polecataerospace.com/1_16..._soviet_n1.htm |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
Darren J Longhorn wrote: http://www.moonrace2001.org/n1_launch.shtml http://www.polecataerospace.com/1_16..._soviet_n1.htm Ah hell, you beat me to it. That is _some_ piece of work. =-O Pat |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
SpaceLoft XL Failure
"C. Newport" wrote in message . .. OK, now I've got to figure this out. Accordoing to Estes, a D motor is a maximum of 20 newton-seconds. A Q motor is anywhere from 81,920 n-s to 163,840 n-s. Consequently, you would need anywhere from 4,096 to 8,192 Estes D motors to equal the output of Gene's Q motor. That makes sense since each letter basically doubles the newton-seconds of the previous one. (If I recall correctly.) I feel good now C. Newport |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Launch failure and atomic test videos | Rusty | History | 30 | September 8th 06 12:58 PM |
NASA Details Risks to Astronauts on Mission to Hubble | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 174 | May 14th 04 09:38 PM |
NASA Details Risks to Astronauts on Mission to Hubble | Scott M. Kozel | Policy | 108 | May 11th 04 12:27 PM |