#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mars Needs Drivers
So, we've been following the recent history of two marvelous robots, Mars
Exploration Rovers (MER) "Spirit" and "Opportunity." But after two months of remarkable science, impressive images of rock layers, distant hills, "blueberry" hematite nodules, and even a partial solar eclispe by a Martian moon, I'm left thinking... WHO CARES?! I know, this is blantant mutiny from a space enthusiast. These doggone robots took weeks to stand up, shake their legs, stretch their solar wings, and then stood for a long look around, for another week! I know very well why we should take great care in exploring any new and unique place, particularly with a rare successfully-landed probe. Yes, and the almost certain mission success in determining water once flowed on the surface of another world in our solar system - it's great science! But, I'm still idling at "ho-hum" A few weeks after the Mars Rover landings I watched NASA Administrator O'Keefe testify to a U.S. Congressional committee about how his agency would carry out the January 2004 Presidential Space Initiative. And while our government money-watchers congratulated him on NASA's Mars Rover successes, he stopped me cold when he said: "One human geologist could do in one day, what these rovers will do in their entire 90 day missions!" Yes, exactly. Our machines are technically brilliant, and still "dumb-as-a-box-of-red -Martian-rocks!" A single astronaut would have cracked the rocks, put his or her nose up against the visor, taken some close-up photos, bagged the sample, and reported initial findings to Earth in great detail--all before the rover got one steering knuckle unkinked. The problem with these rovers is the driver is too far away from the vehicle. There is no astronaut with a joystick in his or her right hand, yanking and banking around craters and boulders, and leaving a rooster tail of red dust in his wake. There are no humorous remarks about driving style from a fellow Marswalker, or observations of the hurtling small moons overhead. We hear no verbal barrage of archane rock talk lingo from someone who waited a lifetime to practice this trade on a new world. No one there now on the red plains of Mars can pull off a fender fix using plastic maps and tape. (OK, I know the Mars Rovers have no fenders.) The U.S. leadership has made the first move: they've outlined a plan, and asked the government for more money. Yes, a crew needs so much more than a robot--like food, air, water, and cosmic protection--and it costs way, way more. Brilliant robotic programs have been NASA's mainstay, and their most far-reaching successes for 30 years. However, if you'd like me to pay more attention to any Mars Rovers, just put an astronaut in the driver's seat. -- JW ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"John Whisenhunt" wrote in message ... A single astronaut would have cracked the rocks, put his or her nose up against the visor, taken some close-up photos, bagged the sample, and reported initial findings to Earth in great detail--all before the rover got one steering knuckle unkinked. Yeah, but think of the expense! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
John Whisenhunt wrote: I know very well why we should take great care in exploring any new and unique place, particularly with a rare successfully-landed probe. I don't know how your country is doing, but the U.S. has a 5 out of 6 success rate when it comes to landing Mars probes. I snipped the rest; if you want to send someone up there in the near future, I suggest that you figure out to pay for it given our present budget situation.... and here's a thought...suppose they find evidence of life up there...either now, or in the past. Then introducing Earth microorganisms into that environment could well destroy the indigenous Martian lifeforms; and you have to be sure that there aren't any before you start letting people onto the planet, because they are going to bring all sorts of biological goodies with their arrival. Pat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It is easy to feel indifferent in regards to the Mars missions. I think it
is because the landscape looks rather familiar. But when you consider that a few weeks ago we had much less data on the appearance of the now-familiar surface, I think it puts the new photos in perspective. The current batch of rovers have much more instrumentation than the Pathfinder. And it is, after all, the first mission with a close-up lens on the camera. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
However, if you'd like me to pay more
attention to any Mars Rovers, just put an astronaut in the driver's seat. -- JW Ahh its true a man could do so much. but we presently have NO WAY to get there and its at least 15 years out in a apollo all costs who cares program! What we need is smarter rovers who can zip around with the intelligence of a 12 year old playing a video game And enough replacement rovers to cover the inevitable losses...... Hey this is my opinion |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"John Whisenhunt" wrote in
: A single astronaut would have cracked the rocks, put his or her nose up against the visor, taken some close-up photos, bagged the sample, and reported initial findings to Earth in great detail--all before the rover got one steering knuckle unkinked. And that single astronaut would have cost some 50 to 200 times as much to get there. And the mission lead time would have been 15-25 years, instead of the 5 years the rovers took. And that single astronaut might have landed in a place that DIDNT have such nice revealing geography. After all, the previous 3 fully succesful nasa mars lander missions didnt. FIRST solve the "easy" questions using the fastest, cheapest means available. THEN go on to more complex solutions, to answer the deeper mysteries. This is both the fastest, cheapest and most productive way to do exploration. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... Then introducing Earth microorganisms into that environment could well destroy the indigenous Martian lifeforms; Well, don't forget, for a while at least the astronauts will be suffering from Marstezuma's Revenge. Don't drink the water! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - March 26, 2004 | Ron | Misc | 0 | March 26th 04 05:05 PM |
Space Calendar - September 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | September 28th 03 08:00 AM |
Space Calendar - August 28, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | August 28th 03 05:32 PM |
Space Calendar - July 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | July 24th 03 11:26 PM |
Space Calendar - June 27, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 3 | June 28th 03 05:36 PM |