|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.
On Jan 4, 10:03 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
On 04.01.2013 14:36, Pentcho Valev wrote: Clever Draper, Special relativity predicts both - that the travelling twin proves younger and that the sedentary twin proves younger Can you prove that the Lorentz transform predicts this? We all know that you can't, which I am sure you will demonstrate by failing to do so. On the other hand, the little professor from Trondheim has demonstrated that he has failed miserably at understand the Lorentz transform. shrug - but Einsteiniana's scenarios demonstrate only the former prediction and conceal the latter. Here you can see the twin scenario from both twins' point of view: http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html Good job, paul. You have handed over the material that proves you have no understanding of what the Lorentz transform is all about. shrug When B is not accelerating, the Lorentz transform says there is no way to tell absolutely who is traveling and who is not. Time dilation should be building up when A observes B as well as when B observes A. The JAVA applet does not reflect what the Lorentz transform says. You may want to decrease the acceleration distance to just 1 and increase acceleration to 2 for a better dramatic effect. shrug paul’s gross blunder: The mutual time dilation is building up when B is not accelerating. The applet violates the principle of relativity. shrug Hopefully, paul remains ignorant on this one since else he would remove the material just like he did with the rest of his blunders. shrug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.
On 04.01.2013 22:49, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jan 4, 10:03 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote: On 04.01.2013 14:36, Pentcho Valev wrote: Clever Draper, Special relativity predicts both - that the travelling twin proves younger and that the sedentary twin proves younger Can you prove that the Lorentz transform predicts this? We all know that you can't, which I am sure you will demonstrate by failing to do so. On the other hand, the little professor from Trondheim has demonstrated that he has failed miserably at understand the Lorentz transform. shrug - but Einsteiniana's scenarios demonstrate only the former prediction and conceal the latter. Here you can see the twin scenario from both twins' point of view: http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html Good job, paul. You have handed over the material that proves you have no understanding of what the Lorentz transform is all about. shrug When B is not accelerating, the Lorentz transform says there is no way to tell absolutely who is traveling and who is not. Time dilation should be building up when A observes B as well as when B observes A. The JAVA applet does not reflect what the Lorentz transform says. You may want to decrease the acceleration distance to just 1 and increase acceleration to 2 for a better dramatic effect. shrug paul’s gross blunder: The mutual time dilation is building up when B is not accelerating. The applet violates the principle of relativity. shrug I won't bother to quibble about your nonsense. Nobody cares about your babble anyway. Hopefully, paul remains ignorant on this one since else he would remove the material just like he did with the rest of his blunders. shrug I have deleted nothing. I have however changed the host for my homepage, so the pointers in old postings in the Google archive won't work. My current homepage is at the bottom of the page. However, many of the papers are of an "ad hoc" character an is not found on that homepage, but you will find them he http://www.gethome.no/paulba/pdf/index.htm I am sure you will find the rest of my blunders there. Was it any particular you had in mind? I look forward to yet another request for a reminder of one of your blunders. -- Paul http://www.gethome.no/paulba/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.
On Jan 5, 5:14 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote:
On 04.01.2013 22:49, Koobee Wublee wrote: paul wrote: Boo! Scare you paul. Koobee Wublee knows you are greatly haunted by Koobee Wublee. Please relax. shrug http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html Good job, paul. You have handed over the material that proves you have no understanding of what the Lorentz transform is all about. shrug When B is not accelerating, the Lorentz transform says there is no way to tell absolutely who is traveling and who is not. Time dilation should be building up when A observes B as well as when B observes A. The JAVA applet does not reflect what the Lorentz transform says. You may want to decrease the acceleration distance to just 1 and increase acceleration to 2 for a better dramatic effect. shrug paul’s gross blunder: The mutual time dilation is building up when B is not accelerating. The applet violates the principle of relativity. shrug I won't bother to quibble about your nonsense. [rest of whining nonsense snipped] OK, paul. Koobee Wublee will make you a deal. Why don’t you modify your JAVA applet and allow both twins to travel with the same acceleration profile. Please also allow time when both are not accelerating but with mutual time dilation building up due to relative speed. With the same acceleration profiles, the effect of that should cancel out, no? please |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution.
On 06.01.2013 00:43, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jan 5, 5:14 am, "Paul B. Andersen" wrote: http://www.gethome.no/paulba/twins.html OK, paul. Koobee Wublee will make you a deal. Why don’t you modify your JAVA applet and allow both twins to travel with the same acceleration profile. That's a request. What's the deal? -- Paul http://www.gethome.no/paulba/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Simplified Twin Paradox Resolution. | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 24 | January 8th 13 06:51 AM |
The twin paradox | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 22 | May 11th 12 02:35 AM |
TWIN PARADOX OR TWIN ABSURDITY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 111 | November 25th 10 12:41 PM |
TWIN PARADOX OR TWIN ABSURDITY? | Androcles[_33_] | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | November 2nd 10 04:12 PM |
The twin paradox revisited | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 6 | July 11th 07 01:47 AM |