|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of Flowing Space into Mass (was - Einstein was an...)
In article .com,
"Double-A" wrote: Kook capitals noted and quacky a so called un-approved application for PhD (Please help Ducky) I hope his grammar and spelling on his dissertation were better than he has displayed here, or approval of any PhD is doubtful! OH I dropped a capital E - someone send for the doctor... So please tell me your last scientific publication, Double-Anus? -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of Flowing Space into Mass (was - Einstein was an...)
In article . com,
"Double-A" wrote: I filed a complete report in Troubling Planetary News thread. Temporary power outage tonight, but now the power is back on, and I'm back online! Just all in a night's work for a Earth Science Officer manning the most extreme post on the western weather front. Have any of you ever kissed a girl? -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of Flowing Space into Mass (was - Einstein was an...)
From Mud duck, in reply to question "What is being warped?":
The shape of spacetime. Hmm. Sounds like Duck and db have been hangin' out. Same mama doll, pull string response. :-) Really, even a dunderhead like you should understand this. Well Duckster, us dunderheads seem to believe that *descriptions of effects* do not equate to _explanations of causation_. Field equations, geometric coordinates and 'metrics' describe something. They do not _cause_ it. A speedometer readout describes something. According to your logic, twisting the speedometer needle should make the car go, and twisting it further should make it accelerate. Us dunderheads believe that you, db, OG, Scott et al lack even the most basic comprehension of the difference between descriptions of effects and _explanations of causation_.. and that as such, your worldview is Quack-ery. Har har. :-) oc |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of Flowing Space into Mass (was - Einstein was an...)
In article ,
(Bill Sheppard) wrote: Well Duckster, us dunderheads seem to believe that *descriptions of effects* do not equate to _explanations of causation_. Field equations, geometric coordinates and 'metrics' describe something. They do not _cause_ it. Matter tells space how to curve Space tells matter how to move. A speedometer readout describes something. According to your logic, twisting the speedometer needle should make the car go, and twisting it further should make it accelerate. Don't project your faulty logic on me. Us dunderheads believe that you, db, OG, Scott et al lack even the most basic comprehension of the difference between descriptions of effects and _explanations of causation_.. and that as such, your worldview is Quack-ery. Har har. :-) And your belief is worthless as it has no grounds in reality. Please tell me your physics qualifications, this should be good for a laugh. Or are you another of nightbats space cadets? Congratulations. You've just proved you completely misunderstand the point of Einsteins field equations Matter tells space how to curve Space tells matter how to move. The fact you're an anti-relativist puts you the as the quack. And as a hint, I chose this obviously fake name for a reason. Its a good sign of a kook if they start saying things like "duckster"... -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was a wise old elf
From Duckie:
Don't project your faulty logic on ME. Sorry. And your belief is worthless as it has no grounds in reality. I'm shattered. Should i go stand in corner?:-) Please tell me your physics qualifications. #1, I managed to escape the 'space-as-void' indoctrination. Or are you another of nightbats space cadets? No, a probationary cadet. Congratulations. Thank you. You've just proved you completely misunderstand the point of Einsteins field equations Apparently you have a very superficial knowledge base. You seem unaware that Einstein fully endorsed the reality of the spatial medium until well into the 1920s before inexplicably flip-flopping to the 'no medium' idea which then grew legs and became the bedrock axiom of science.. all in the space of scarcely 80 years. Can you explain the flip-flop? The 'ether', as it was known to Einstein, was depicted as fixed and immobile, like a rigid lattice. Yet the existance of such a medium was disproven by Michelson-Morley in 1887. He FINALLY rejected it, and rightly so. But why did he continue endorsing it for 35+ years before doing so? Why, instead of further investigating a medium that's FLUID, compressible/expansible and amenalble to density gradients, did Einstein suddenly "throw out the baby with the bathwater" and go with 'no medium'? Why did he instead adopt the "curvature of space" metaphor? Matter tells space how to curve Oh. But if space is 'nothing', what's curving? Space tells matter how to move. Sounds like Abbot & Costello in "Who's on first?" :-) The fact you're an anti-relativist puts you the as the quack. Who's an anti-relativist?? And as a hint, I chose this obviously fake name for a reason. I see. Its a good sign of a kook if they start saying things like "duckster"... How 'bout Baby Huey? (-: oc |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was a wise old elf
In article ,
(Bill Sheppard) wrote: Apparently you have a very superficial knowledge base. You seem unaware that Einstein fully endorsed the reality of the spatial medium until well into the 1920s before inexplicably flip-flopping to the 'no medium' idea which then grew legs and became the bedrock axiom of science.. all in the space of scarcely 80 years. Can you explain the flip-flop? His work with GR... The 'ether', as it was known to Einstein, was depicted as fixed and immobile, like a rigid lattice. Yet the existance of such a medium was disproven by Michelson-Morley in 1887. He FINALLY rejected it, and rightly so. But why did he continue endorsing it for 35+ years before doing so? Why, instead of further investigating a medium that's FLUID, compressible/expansible and amenalble to density gradients, did Einstein suddenly "throw out the baby with the bathwater" and go with 'no medium'? Why did he instead adopt the "curvature of space" metaphor? Scientists often try various ideas before settling on the one that works. The whole early 20th century science was already in flux thanks to Maxwell.... -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was a wise old elf
In article ,
(Bill Sheppard) wrote: Matter tells space how to curve Oh. But if space is 'nothing', what's curving? Space tells matter how to move. Sounds like Abbot & Costello in "Who's on first?" :-) No - its called coupling. Happens a lot in systems. -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was a wise old elf
|
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was a wise old elf
From Mr. (Ms. Mrs.?) Duck:
you are a space cadet. -- Just \int_0^\infty du it! A probationary space cadet, thank you. oc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY | ACE | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 28th 05 07:07 PM |
Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS | ftl_freak | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 04:48 PM |
Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS | ftl_freak | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 04:09 PM |
Einstein | Tom Kirke | Astronomy Misc | 10 | June 1st 05 10:13 PM |
Einstein | Tom Kirke | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | June 1st 05 10:13 PM |