|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
On 17 Jul, 17:10, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Ian Parker wrote: :On 16 Jul, 02:34, calvin wrote: : : Michael Griffin is a delusional liar who will say or do anything to : salvage his legacy, which is now beyond salvaging, but he doesn't : realize that. This guy is almost an exact clone of George W. Bush. : : Bush is not a liar, whatever this Michael Griffin is. : :Oh, so there was WMD in Iraq. : There is a difference between being wrong and being a liar. Of course, you are both, so perhaps you cannot differentiate... -- "You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of *your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear." The CIA knew this from the word go. It was guerre a l'outrace. You might argue SH had to be removed and a few lies were needed to do this. However figure this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein He was put there by you lot. If he wasn't there in the first place he would not have had to be removed. There is one other fact that I think is significant. The CIA made the US Army hunt for WMD which it knew all along did not exist. Meanwhile the ethic cleansing which has displaced over 4 million people started. - Ian Parker |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:07:14 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
Ian Parker made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On 16 Jul, 02:34, calvin wrote: Michael Griffin is a delusional liar who will say or do anything to salvage his legacy, which is now beyond salvaging, but he doesn't realize that. This guy is almost an exact clone of George W. Bush. Bush is not a liar, whatever this Michael Griffin is. Oh, so there was WMD in Iraq. Whether or not there was WMD in Iraq has nothing to do with whether or not Bush is a liar. Only an illogical ignoramus would think there is. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
On 17 Jul, 21:30, (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:07:14 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away, Ian Parker made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On 16 Jul, 02:34, calvin wrote: Michael Griffin is a delusional liar who will say or do anything to salvage his legacy, which is now beyond salvaging, but he doesn't realize that. This guy is almost an exact clone of George W. Bush. Bush is not a liar, whatever this Michael Griffin is. Oh, so there was WMD in Iraq. Whether or not there was WMD in Iraq has nothing to do with whether or not Bush is a liar. *Only an illogical ignoramus would think there is. He said there were. It was not true. He rubbished Ralph Ikea. What else. - Ian Parker |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:19:57 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
Ian Parker made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On 17 Jul, 21:30, (Rand Simberg) wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:07:14 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away, Ian Parker made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On 16 Jul, 02:34, calvin wrote: Michael Griffin is a delusional liar who will say or do anything to salvage his legacy, which is now beyond salvaging, but he doesn't realize that. This guy is almost an exact clone of George W. Bush. Bush is not a liar, whatever this Michael Griffin is. Oh, so there was WMD in Iraq. Whether or not there was WMD in Iraq has nothing to do with whether or not Bush is a liar. *Only an illogical ignoramus would think there is. He said there were. It was not true. Thank you. You indisputably demonstrate that you equate saying something is not true with a lie. Thus, you also demonstrate my point about ignorant illogical idiots, with no understanding of the meaning of the word "liar," and "lie." And actually, we still don't even know that it wasn't true. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
Ian Parker wrote:
:On 17 Jul, 17:10, Fred J. McCall wrote: : Ian Parker wrote: : : :On 16 Jul, 02:34, calvin wrote: : : : : Michael Griffin is a delusional liar who will say or do anything to : : salvage his legacy, which is now beyond salvaging, but he doesn't : : realize that. This guy is almost an exact clone of George W. Bush. : : : : Bush is not a liar, whatever this Michael Griffin is. : : : :Oh, so there was WMD in Iraq. : : : : There is a difference between being wrong and being a liar. : : Of course, you are both, so perhaps you cannot differentiate... : : -- : "You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of : *your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear." : :The CIA knew this from the word go. : See what I mean about you being a liar? : :It was guerre a l'outrace. You :might argue SH had to be removed and a few lies were needed to do :this. However figure this. : :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddam_Hussein : :He was put there by you lot. If he wasn't there in the first place he :would not have had to be removed. : You've been corrected on this before. He was ***NOT*** "put there by" us. Your cite doesn't support your statement. Given that you have been repeatedly corrected on this and yet still keep saying it, you have graduated from merely being ignorant to being an outright and deliberate liar. : :There is one other fact that I think is significant. The CIA made the :US Army hunt for WMD which it knew all along did not exist. Meanwhile :the ethic cleansing which has displaced over 4 million people started. : You mean there's one other delusion of yours based on lies about the facts which you would like to put forward as if it is significant. -- "You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear." -- Mark Twain |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
On 18 Jul, 01:24, (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:19:57 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away, Ian Parker made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On 17 Jul, 21:30, (Rand Simberg) wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:07:14 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away, Ian Parker made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: On 16 Jul, 02:34, calvin wrote: Michael Griffin is a delusional liar who will say or do anything to salvage his legacy, which is now beyond salvaging, but he doesn't realize that. This guy is almost an exact clone of George W. Bush.. Bush is not a liar, whatever this Michael Griffin is. Oh, so there was WMD in Iraq. Whether or not there was WMD in Iraq has nothing to do with whether or not Bush is a liar. *Only an illogical ignoramus would think there is. He said there were. It was not true. Thank you. *You indisputably demonstrate that you equate saying something is not true with a lie. *Thus, you also demonstrate my point about ignorant illogical idiots, with no understanding of the meaning of the word "liar," and "lie." And actually, we still don't even know that it wasn't true.- Hide quoted text - You talk the most complete rot. The criteria for resolution is 1.22 lambda/d and if you are looking down on the Earth you are diffraction limited. Lets take d = 1m height = 250km lamda (green) = 0.5 micron This gives us resolution of 1.22*250*10^3/0.5*10^6 = 1.22/8 m or about 14cm How can WMD NOT be seen you tell me. C'mon they were lying through their teeth - Admit it. - Ian Parker PS - Are the laws of Phsical Optics going to be disputed like Relativity? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
Ian Parker wrote:
:On 18 Jul, 01:24, (Rand Simberg) wrote: : : And actually, we still don't even know that it wasn't true.- Hide quoted text - : :You talk the most complete rot. The criteria for resolution is 1.22 :lambda/d and if you are looking down on the Earth you are diffraction :limited. Lets take : :d = 1m :height = 250km :lamda (green) = 0.5 micron : :This gives us resolution of 1.22*250*10^3/0.5*10^6 = 1.22/8 m or about :14cm : :How can WMD NOT be seen you tell me. C'mon they were lying through :their teeth - Admit it. : Now ask yourself how big an area you can watch at that resolution. : :PS - Are the laws of Phsical Optics going to be disputed like :Relativity? : PS - Apparently the laws of Reason have already gone by the wayside in your immediate neighborhood. -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is only stupid." -- Heinrich Heine |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
On 19 Jul, 02:12, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Ian Parker wrote: :On 18 Jul, 01:24, (Rand Simberg) wrote: : : And actually, we still don't even know that it wasn't true.- Hide quoted text - : :You talk the most complete rot. The criteria for resolution is 1.22 :lambda/d and if you are looking down on the Earth you are diffraction :limited. Lets take : :d = 1m :height = 250km :lamda (green) = 0.5 micron : :This gives us resolution of 1.22*250*10^3/0.5*10^6 = 1.22/8 m or about :14cm : :How can WMD NOT be seen you tell me. C'mon they were lying through :their teeth - Admit it. : Now ask yourself how big an area you can watch at that resolution. : :PS - Are the laws of Phsical Optics going to be disputed like :Relativity? : PS - Apparently the laws of Reason have already gone by the wayside in your immediate neighborhood. Certainly the area Ralph Ikea could see. Basically the evice is programmable to sweep out the area required. It will this take pictures of the areas of interest. With 3.5 micron IR and 1m resollution it will detect signs of activity even if that activity is concealed.. This activity can then be sen at high optical resolution. Basically a satellite will make a programmed sweep take in several GB which it downloads at a different point in its orbit. There is one further point. Iraq has been ethnically cleansed. This started with the US Army being depoyed searching for WMD. The correct way of looking for WMD is multispectral images. Not taking soliers away from other tasks. - Ian Parker |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
Ian Parker wrote:
:On 19 Jul, 02:12, Fred J. McCall wrote: : Ian Parker wrote: : : :On 18 Jul, 01:24, (Rand Simberg) wrote: : : : : And actually, we still don't even know that it wasn't true.- Hide quoted text - : : : :You talk the most complete rot. The criteria for resolution is 1.22 : :lambda/d and if you are looking down on the Earth you are diffraction : :limited. Lets take : : : :d = 1m : :height = 250km : :lamda (green) = 0.5 micron : : : :This gives us resolution of 1.22*250*10^3/0.5*10^6 = 1.22/8 m or about : :14cm : : : :How can WMD NOT be seen you tell me. C'mon they were lying through : :their teeth - Admit it. : : : : Now ask yourself how big an area you can watch at that resolution. : : : : :PS - Are the laws of Phsical Optics going to be disputed like : :Relativity? : : : : PS - Apparently the laws of Reason have already gone by the wayside in : your immediate neighborhood. : :Certainly the area Ralph Ikea could see. : Which was what? : :Basically the evice is rogrammable to sweep out the area required. It will this take ictures of the areas of interest. With 3.5 micron IR and 1m :resollution it will detect signs of activity even if that activity is :concealed.. This activity can then be sen at high optical resolution. : :Basically a satellite will make a programmed sweep take in several GB :which it downloads at a different point in its orbit. : Yes, and when it's not looking it's not looking. : :There is one further point. Iraq has been ethnically cleansed. This :started with the US Army being depoyed searching for WMD. : Hogwash. It 'started' with us taking the minority Sunni boot off the necks of the majority Shiites. : :The correct :way of looking for WMD is multispectral images. Not taking soliers :away from other tasks. : You're an ignorant idiot. Explain to us how such devices can see through sand, into buildings, etc... -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is only stupid." -- Heinrich Heine |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
China 'could reach Moon by 2020'
On 19 Jul, 21:02, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Ian Parker wrote: :On 19 Jul, 02:12, Fred J. McCall wrote: : Ian Parker wrote: : : :On 18 Jul, 01:24, (Rand Simberg) wrote: : : : : And actually, we still don't even know that it wasn't true.- Hide quoted text - : : : :You talk the most complete rot. The criteria for resolution is 1.22 : :lambda/d and if you are looking down on the Earth you are diffraction : :limited. Lets take : : : :d = 1m : :height = 250km : :lamda (green) = 0.5 micron : : : :This gives us resolution of 1.22*250*10^3/0.5*10^6 = 1.22/8 m or about : :14cm : : : :How can WMD NOT be seen you tell me. C'mon they were lying through : :their teeth - Admit it. : : : : Now ask yourself how big an area you can watch at that resolution. : : : : :PS - Are the laws of Phsical Optics going to be disputed like : :Relativity? : : : : PS - Apparently the laws of Reason have already gone by the wayside in : your immediate neighborhood. : :Certainly the area Ralph Ikea could see. : Which was what? : :Basically the evice is rogrammable to sweep out the area required. It will this take ictures of the areas of interest. With 3.5 micron IR and 1m :resollution it will detect signs of activity even if that activity is :concealed.. This activity can then be sen at high optical resolution. : :Basically a satellite will make a programmed sweep take in several GB :which it downloads at a different point in its orbit. : Yes, and when it's not looking it's not looking. : :There is one further point. Iraq has been ethnically cleansed. This :started with the US Army being depoyed searching for WMD. : Hogwash. *It 'started' with us taking the minority Sunni boot off the necks of the majority Shiites. : :The correct :way of looking for WMD is multispectral images. Not taking soliers :away from other tasks. : You're an ignorant idiot. *Explain to us how such devices can see through sand, into buildings, etc... -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine You don't need coverage all the time. The movement of lorries could be tracked. If you are telling me that a WMD program cannot be seen in a sunny desert I just don't believe you. I don't think anyone else will. Basically the movement of lorries can be traced. Tracks can be seen, cooling engines and indeed any activity can be spotted in IR. Oh no. - Ian Parker |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
China 'could reach Moon by 2020' | Agent Smith | Policy | 29 | July 22nd 08 07:23 PM |
NASA plans return to Moon by 2020? | Gareth Slee | Space Shuttle | 6 | September 20th 05 05:51 PM |
NASA plans return to Moon by 2020? | Gareth Slee | History | 0 | September 19th 05 05:06 PM |
China to Moon by 2020 | Steve Dufour | Policy | 6 | December 5th 03 09:33 AM |
China to Moon by 2020 | Steve Dufour | Misc | 2 | December 3rd 03 01:32 AM |