|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
Okay, he wasn't an idiot. I just wrote that to get you attention.
Einstein may have been a genius in his field but that doesn't mean he was an expert in other fields, like theology and religion. He could have been (and I believe he was) and idiot insofar as religion is concerned. There's no way in hell he could have studied enough of the source material to reach any informed conclusions. It takes as much study to become a theologian as it does to become a physicist. Not many people in our day and age can be true multi-disciplinarians. So why all this **** about whether Einstein was an atheist or not, as though whether he was or wasn't carries any weight? It's like asking the Pope if he believes in string theory. If he does it must be true etc etc And the biggest idiots of all were the ones who posed the question to AE in the first place as to whether he was an atheist or not. I'm surprised old AE didn't just pop off: "Oh shut the f*** up and let me do my science." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
46erjoe wrote: Okay, he wasn't an idiot. I just wrote that to get you attention. Einstein may have been a genius in his field but that doesn't mean he was an expert in other fields, like theology and religion. He could have been (and I believe he was) and idiot insofar as religion is concerned. There's no way in hell he could have studied enough of the source material to reach any informed conclusions. It takes as much study to become a theologian as it does to become a physicist. Do you think that four years of studying dogmas at a seminary gets one any closer to ultimate truths? Not many people in our day and age can be true multi-disciplinarians. So why all this **** about whether Einstein was an atheist or not, as though whether he was or wasn't carries any weight? It's like asking the Pope if he believes in string theory. If he does it must be true etc etc The Pope is held to infallible on matters of faith and doctrine, but is string theory doctrine? Believing in it does take a lot of faith! And the biggest idiots of all were the ones who posed the question to AE in the first place as to whether he was an atheist or not. I'm surprised old AE didn't just pop off: "Oh shut the f*** up and let me do my science." Einstein had a lot of opinions outside of science, but most people never gave them much weight. Double-A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
nightbat wrote
Double-A wrote: 46erjoe wrote: Okay, he wasn't an idiot. I just wrote that to get you attention. Einstein may have been a genius in his field but that doesn't mean he was an expert in other fields, like theology and religion. He could have been (and I believe he was) and idiot insofar as religion is concerned. There's no way in hell he could have studied enough of the source material to reach any informed conclusions. It takes as much study to become a theologian as it does to become a physicist. Do you think that four years of studying dogmas at a seminary gets one any closer to ultimate truths? Not many people in our day and age can be true multi-disciplinarians. So why all this **** about whether Einstein was an atheist or not, as though whether he was or wasn't carries any weight? It's like asking the Pope if he believes in string theory. If he does it must be true etc etc The Pope is held to infallible on matters of faith and doctrine, but is string theory doctrine? Believing in it does take a lot of faith! And the biggest idiots of all were the ones who posed the question to AE in the first place as to whether he was an atheist or not. I'm surprised old AE didn't just pop off: "Oh shut the f*** up and let me do my science." Einstein had a lot of opinions outside of science, but most people never gave them much weight. Double-A nightbat Correct Commander first the coffee boys make fun and nominate Team members for their original profound far advanced predictions, theories, and give them silly awards and then accuse those same members of plagiarism. How they wish they could come up with just one original science discovery instead of constant playing with themselves. Dr. Einstein did not like being made an authority and warned about seeking it. The clueless ones seek attention and fame at the expense of the dedicated researchers, for how they hang on your every word. Predictions come and go but results remain forever. Clueless Saul is no exception, for the observed melting mountain peaks and breaking or melting pole icebergs do not deter his disbelieve, for he exclaims, I don't see any Alps or icebergs melting in the desert. Everything here is perfectly normal, what are you profound Earth Science Team Officers talking about? You mean this stuff really is going on? Dr. Einstein had to deal with the clueless, nothing new, and his genius first wife had to deal with him. The annals of science are filled with the greats having to deal with discovered advanced knowledge understanding and at the time accepted miss true reality. Just remember when standing in front of these in ah of you try to be kind, for they mentally challenged can't help it, gray matter doesn't come with instructions. ponder on, the nightbat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
nightbat wrote: nightbat wrote Double-A wrote: 46erjoe wrote: Okay, he wasn't an idiot. I just wrote that to get you attention. Einstein may have been a genius in his field but that doesn't mean he was an expert in other fields, like theology and religion. He could have been (and I believe he was) and idiot insofar as religion is concerned. There's no way in hell he could have studied enough of the source material to reach any informed conclusions. It takes as much study to become a theologian as it does to become a physicist. Do you think that four years of studying dogmas at a seminary gets one any closer to ultimate truths? Not many people in our day and age can be true multi-disciplinarians. So why all this **** about whether Einstein was an atheist or not, as though whether he was or wasn't carries any weight? It's like asking the Pope if he believes in string theory. If he does it must be true etc etc The Pope is held to infallible on matters of faith and doctrine, but is string theory doctrine? Believing in it does take a lot of faith! And the biggest idiots of all were the ones who posed the question to AE in the first place as to whether he was an atheist or not. I'm surprised old AE didn't just pop off: "Oh shut the f*** up and let me do my science." Einstein had a lot of opinions outside of science, but most people never gave them much weight. Double-A nightbat Correct Commander first the coffee boys make fun and nominate Team members for their original profound far advanced predictions, theories, and give them silly awards and then accuse those same members of plagiarism. How they wish they could come up with just one original science discovery instead of constant playing with themselves. Dr. Einstein did not like being made an authority and warned about seeking it. The clueless ones seek attention and fame at the expense of the dedicated researchers, for how they hang on your every word. Predictions come and go but results remain forever. Clueless Saul is no exception, for the observed melting mountain peaks and breaking or melting pole icebergs do not deter his disbelieve, for he exclaims, I don't see any Alps or icebergs melting in the desert. Everything here is perfectly normal, what are you profound Earth Science Team Officers talking about? You mean this stuff really is going on? Dr. Einstein had to deal with the clueless, nothing new, and his genius first wife had to deal with him. The annals of science are filled with the greats having to deal with discovered advanced knowledge understanding and at the time accepted miss true reality. Just remember when standing in front of these in ah of you try to be kind, for they mentally challenged can't help it, gray matter doesn't come with instructions. ponder on, the nightbat Thanks for you fine remarks, Captain General nightbat. The coffee boys with all their silly awards have not been able to keep their act together very well lately. Just goes to show their lack of organizational ability. Dr. Einstein and Dr. Tesla were visionaries of their times. That is why their admirers study their every word. But still the scoffers try to find fault wherever they can. Yes, the Earth Science Team Officers are having to keep well apprised of all the apocalyptic changes that are going on nowadays on this troubled planet. Coffee boys run about clueless to their pending fate. But we await FOC. Atheists want to claim Einstein as one of their own despite his proclaiming that God doesn't play dice. Yet Buzz Aldrin sensed something surely divine after seeing for the first time the far side of the Moon, and proclaimed, "goodnight, good luck, a Merry Christmas and God bless all of you - all of you on the good earth." Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Einstien was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
Nightbat,and Double-A When Einstein was in Texas teaching hydraulics he
patterned an invention "refrigeration" with no moving parts He was also a good violin player. Had a sense of humor. Had very smart friends. He knew when he was right. Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist... and so was Isaac Asimov
"Double-A" wrote in message
oups.com... nightbat wrote: Double-A wrote: 46erjoe wrote: Okay, he wasn't an idiot. I just wrote that to get you attention. Einstein may have been a genius in his field but that doesn't mean he was an expert in other fields, like theology and religion. He could have been (and I believe he was) and idiot insofar as religion is concerned. There's no way in hell he could have studied enough of the source material to reach any informed conclusions. It takes as much study to become a theologian as it does to become a physicist. Do you think that four years of studying dogmas at a seminary gets one any closer to ultimate truths? Not many people in our day and age can be true multi-disciplinarians. So why all this **** about whether Einstein was an atheist or not, as though whether he was or wasn't carries any weight? It's like asking the Pope if he believes in string theory. If he does it must be true etc etc The Pope is held to infallible on matters of faith and doctrine, but is string theory doctrine? Believing in it does take a lot of faith! And the biggest idiots of all were the ones who posed the question to AE in the first place as to whether he was an atheist or not. I'm surprised old AE didn't just pop off: "Oh shut the f*** up and let me do my science." Einstein had a lot of opinions outside of science, but most people never gave them much weight. Double-A Correct Commander first the coffee boys make fun and nominate Team members for their original profound far advanced predictions, theories, and give them silly awards and then accuse those same members of plagiarism. How they wish they could come up with just one original science discovery instead of constant playing with themselves. Dr. Einstein did not like being made an authority and warned about seeking it. The clueless ones seek attention and fame at the expense of the dedicated researchers, for how they hang on your every word. Predictions come and go but results remain forever. Clueless Saul is no exception, for the observed melting mountain peaks and breaking or melting pole icebergs do not deter his disbelieve, for he exclaims, I don't see any Alps or icebergs melting in the desert. Everything here is perfectly normal, what are you profound Earth Science Team Officers talking about? You mean this stuff really is going on? Dr. Einstein had to deal with the clueless, nothing new, and his genius first wife had to deal with him. The annals of science are filled with the greats having to deal with discovered advanced knowledge understanding and at the time accepted miss true reality. Just remember when standing in front of these in ah of you try to be kind, for they mentally challenged can't help it, gray matter doesn't come with instructions. ponder on, the nightbat Thanks for you fine remarks, Captain General nightbat. The coffee boys with all their silly awards have not been able to keep their act together very well lately. Just goes to show their lack of organizational ability. Dr. Einstein and Dr. Tesla were visionaries of their times. That is why their admirers study their every word. But still the scoffers try to find fault wherever they can. Yes, the Earth Science Team Officers are having to keep well apprised of all the apocalyptic changes that are going on nowadays on this troubled planet. Coffee boys run about clueless to their pending fate. But we await FOC. Atheists want to claim Einstein as one of their own despite his proclaiming that God doesn't play dice. Yet Buzz Aldrin sensed something surely divine after seeing for the first time the far side of the Moon, and proclaimed, "goodnight, good luck, a Merry Christmas and God bless all of you - all of you on the good earth." Double-A I've read this many times in many places... about how Einstein was an atheist, a "non-believer". And then you read about the God/dice/Universe thing, and wonder if maybe the guy was more agnostic than atheist? Myself, i have no scientific evidence to support it, but i was raised with a strong faith in a power that goes way, way beyond any power of mankind. I personally like this idea because i find it impossible to accept that humans are the summit of life in the Universe. So it troubles me that such obviously and awesomely intelligent, perhaps even wise people such as Einstein and Asimov were atheists. Einstein found it totally unacceptable that a benevolent, omnipresent and omnipotent God could have possibly allowed the atrocities of the 20th-century holocaust. And Asimov based his personal atheism upon good, solid scientific research and reason. And i often wonder if this bothers anybody else? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Give the Devil an inch, and he'll take your Smile! Indelibly yours, Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/ http://www.painellsworth.net |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist... and so was Isaac Asimov
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006 15:45:44 GMT, "Painius"
wrotF: "Double-A" wrote in message roups.com... nightbat wrote: Double-A wrote: 46erjoe wrote: Okay, he wasn't an idiot. I just wrote that to get you attention. Einstein may have been a genius in his field but that doesn't mean he was an expert in other fields, like theology and religion. He could have been (and I believe he was) and idiot insofar as religion is concerned. There's no way in hell he could have studied enough of the source material to reach any informed conclusions. It takes as much study to become a theologian as it does to become a physicist. Do you think that four years of studying dogmas at a seminary gets one any closer to ultimate truths? Not many people in our day and age can be true multi-disciplinarians. So why all this **** about whether Einstein was an atheist or not, as though whether he was or wasn't carries any weight? It's like asking the Pope if he believes in string theory. If he does it must be true etc etc The Pope is held to infallible on matters of faith and doctrine, but is string theory doctrine? Believing in it does take a lot of faith! And the biggest idiots of all were the ones who posed the question to AE in the first place as to whether he was an atheist or not. I'm surprised old AE didn't just pop off: "Oh shut the f*** up and let me do my science." Einstein had a lot of opinions outside of science, but most people never gave them much weight. Double-A Correct Commander first the coffee boys make fun and nominate Team members for their original profound far advanced predictions, theories, and give them silly awards and then accuse those same members of plagiarism. How they wish they could come up with just one original science discovery instead of constant playing with themselves. Dr. Einstein did not like being made an authority and warned about seeking it. The clueless ones seek attention and fame at the expense of the dedicated researchers, for how they hang on your every word. Predictions come and go but results remain forever. Clueless Saul is no exception, for the observed melting mountain peaks and breaking or melting pole icebergs do not deter his disbelieve, for he exclaims, I don't see any Alps or icebergs melting in the desert. Everything here is perfectly normal, what are you profound Earth Science Team Officers talking about? You mean this stuff really is going on? Dr. Einstein had to deal with the clueless, nothing new, and his genius first wife had to deal with him. The annals of science are filled with the greats having to deal with discovered advanced knowledge understanding and at the time accepted miss true reality. Just remember when standing in front of these in ah of you try to be kind, for they mentally challenged can't help it, gray matter doesn't come with instructions. ponder on, the nightbat Thanks for you fine remarks, Captain General nightbat. The coffee boys with all their silly awards have not been able to keep their act together very well lately. Just goes to show their lack of organizational ability. Dr. Einstein and Dr. Tesla were visionaries of their times. That is why their admirers study their every word. But still the scoffers try to find fault wherever they can. Yes, the Earth Science Team Officers are having to keep well apprised of all the apocalyptic changes that are going on nowadays on this troubled planet. Coffee boys run about clueless to their pending fate. But we await FOC. Atheists want to claim Einstein as one of their own despite his proclaiming that God doesn't play dice. Yet Buzz Aldrin sensed something surely divine after seeing for the first time the far side of the Moon, and proclaimed, "goodnight, good luck, a Merry Christmas and God bless all of you - all of you on the good earth." Double-A I've read this many times in many places... about how Einstein was an atheist, a "non-believer". And then you read about the God/dice/Universe thing, and wonder if maybe the guy was more agnostic than atheist? Myself, i have no scientific evidence to support it, but i was raised with a strong faith in a power that goes way, way beyond any power of mankind. I personally like this idea because i find it impossible to accept that humans are the summit of life in the Universe. So it troubles me that such obviously and awesomely intelligent, perhaps even wise people such as Einstein and Asimov were atheists. Einstein found it totally unacceptable that a benevolent, omnipresent and omnipotent God could have possibly allowed the atrocities of the 20th-century holocaust. And Asimov based his personal atheism upon good, solid scientific research and reason. And i often wonder if this bothers anybody else? happy days and... starry starry nights! Atheists or atheistic systems (mainly socialism) have killed more innocent people than all the Christians who have ever lived on earth. Swallow that, AE. Oh, sorry, I forgot. You're dead and already know it. -Me If there's no afterlife, I'm really gonna be ****ed off. ; - ) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist... and so was Isaac Asimov
Painius wrote: "Double-A" wrote in message oups.com... nightbat wrote: Double-A wrote: 46erjoe wrote: Okay, he wasn't an idiot. I just wrote that to get you attention. Einstein may have been a genius in his field but that doesn't mean he was an expert in other fields, like theology and religion. He could have been (and I believe he was) and idiot insofar as religion is concerned. There's no way in hell he could have studied enough of the source material to reach any informed conclusions. It takes as much study to become a theologian as it does to become a physicist. Do you think that four years of studying dogmas at a seminary gets one any closer to ultimate truths? Not many people in our day and age can be true multi-disciplinarians. So why all this **** about whether Einstein was an atheist or not, as though whether he was or wasn't carries any weight? It's like asking the Pope if he believes in string theory. If he does it must be true etc etc The Pope is held to infallible on matters of faith and doctrine, but is string theory doctrine? Believing in it does take a lot of faith! And the biggest idiots of all were the ones who posed the question to AE in the first place as to whether he was an atheist or not. I'm surprised old AE didn't just pop off: "Oh shut the f*** up and let me do my science." Einstein had a lot of opinions outside of science, but most people never gave them much weight. Double-A Correct Commander first the coffee boys make fun and nominate Team members for their original profound far advanced predictions, theories, and give them silly awards and then accuse those same members of plagiarism. How they wish they could come up with just one original science discovery instead of constant playing with themselves. Dr. Einstein did not like being made an authority and warned about seeking it. The clueless ones seek attention and fame at the expense of the dedicated researchers, for how they hang on your every word. Predictions come and go but results remain forever. Clueless Saul is no exception, for the observed melting mountain peaks and breaking or melting pole icebergs do not deter his disbelieve, for he exclaims, I don't see any Alps or icebergs melting in the desert. Everything here is perfectly normal, what are you profound Earth Science Team Officers talking about? You mean this stuff really is going on? Dr. Einstein had to deal with the clueless, nothing new, and his genius first wife had to deal with him. The annals of science are filled with the greats having to deal with discovered advanced knowledge understanding and at the time accepted miss true reality. Just remember when standing in front of these in ah of you try to be kind, for they mentally challenged can't help it, gray matter doesn't come with instructions. ponder on, the nightbat Thanks for you fine remarks, Captain General nightbat. The coffee boys with all their silly awards have not been able to keep their act together very well lately. Just goes to show their lack of organizational ability. Dr. Einstein and Dr. Tesla were visionaries of their times. That is why their admirers study their every word. But still the scoffers try to find fault wherever they can. Yes, the Earth Science Team Officers are having to keep well apprised of all the apocalyptic changes that are going on nowadays on this troubled planet. Coffee boys run about clueless to their pending fate. But we await FOC. Atheists want to claim Einstein as one of their own despite his proclaiming that God doesn't play dice. Yet Buzz Aldrin sensed something surely divine after seeing for the first time the far side of the Moon, and proclaimed, "goodnight, good luck, a Merry Christmas and God bless all of you - all of you on the good earth." Double-A I've read this many times in many places... about how Einstein was an atheist, a "non-believer". And then you read about the God/dice/Universe thing, and wonder if maybe the guy was more agnostic than atheist? Myself, i have no scientific evidence to support it, but i was raised with a strong faith in a power that goes way, way beyond any power of mankind. I personally like this idea because i find it impossible to accept that humans are the summit of life in the Universe. So it troubles me that such obviously and awesomely intelligent, perhaps even wise people such as Einstein and Asimov were atheists. Einstein found it totally unacceptable that a benevolent, omnipresent and omnipotent God could have possibly allowed the atrocities of the 20th-century holocaust. And Asimov based his personal atheism upon good, solid scientific research and reason. And i often wonder if this bothers anybody else? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Give the Devil an inch, and he'll take your Smile! Indelibly yours, Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/ http://www.painellsworth.net I think it takes a strong "faith" to believe that God does not exist, because there is no proof that he does not. l do not have that kind of faith. Double-A |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Einstien was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
nightbat wrote
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Nightbat,and Double-A When Einstein was in Texas teaching hydraulics he patterned an invention "refrigeration" with no moving parts He was also a good violin player. Had a sense of humor. Had very smart friends. He knew when he was right. Bert nightbat Yes like all profound Earth Science Team members and our Officer oc with his refrigeration applied model which our Officer Zinni enjoys so much. Einstein was looking to close the gravitational loop via that same analogy. Trying to close the loop using one Universe is not solution easy for first cause frame is missing. Hence attempts and logical need for outer Universe frame extrapolation as Wolter's and per oc's explained extension. The deep field objective understanding however must be grasped from what can be theoretically deduced, observed, versus field propensity. Latent field memory discovery is the key pointing to missing frame acuity, for it, perfect uniform momentum, has never existed in our space-time. And the deduced reverse is true, the Universe in present necessary disturbed momentum state therefore could not exist. Explaining observed cosmos immense inputted applied energy momentum differential impulse signal is necessary to complete loop cycle via natural means with none available. Officer oc attempts just such a monumental deep field theory task via theoretical outer Universe Wolter engine presentation. See Officer oc for site particulars The nightbat presents an objective unified field view from explained missing frame perspective not dependent on extrapolation but discovered field latent memory remaining only confirmation peer dependent on co researcher confirmed proof or disproof of presented premise. In other words my model lends to observation confirmation and/or nullification, while Officer oc's for Wolter's depends on beyond observable Universe dependence, non observable reality, or nullable imaginary based model. Very much like String theory needing more and more dimensions, branes, and Universes to try to close the loop but without plus/negative confirmable evidence for same. Once you realize the amount of shear required applied inputted non uniform energy momentum needed to create one physical mass particle versus the entire micro/macro field base reality you can begin to grasp absent immense missing natural first cause impulse. Remember the energy field is reciprocal unto itself, (Newton), therefore applied field impulse requires reciprocal equal or greater impulse to required law via disclosed observed field latent memory (nightbat) pointing attempts return to pure uniform momentum. Multi differential energy states do not create or self alter themselves from base energy pure momentum. They are reciprocal to directed or latent redirected applied impulse. ponder on, the nightbat |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
Double-A Einstein had much Jewish prejudice from the time he was born to
the time of his death. So is the way of the witless in his spacetime. Now he is accused to be and idiot in our present spacetime that he can not witness. This proves humankind has its hate built in from one generation to the next. This proves that man is wolf to man(Darwin) This proves that nature created a species of higher life,that was not the best life form to show the universe. Humankind has intrinsic hate. Reality even at this Christmas season man has great hate for one group to the next group to the next group. A critical force of hate,that can only explode. Sad theory but based on great evidence through out the history of man Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY | ACE | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 28th 05 07:07 PM |
Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS | ftl_freak | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 04:48 PM |
Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS | ftl_freak | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 04:09 PM |
Einstein | Tom Kirke | Astronomy Misc | 10 | June 1st 05 10:13 PM |
Einstein | Tom Kirke | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | June 1st 05 10:13 PM |