A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Phased Array [was: ...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...persingle launch!]



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 25th 09, 09:01 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.space.history,sci.physics
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Phased Array [was: ...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...persingle launch!]

Dr J R Stockton wrote:
Without analysis, ISTM that one does want the structures close together,
not for visible or RF "optical" reasons, but since it's probably easier
for other vehicles to avoid them that way. But it may be better to have
them far enough apart to be dodged independently.


There is microgravity to contend with here as well as electrostatic
charging and repulsion.
The microgravity fields of the individual elements will cause them to
try and clump together if there isn't some sort of structure connecting
them; once they get close enough their similar electrical charges will
cause them to repel each other - the end result will be that the forces
balance at some point, and they all start settling into a stable
geodetic lattice of points with equal spacing between each of the elements.*
Unfortunately, that stable shape is a sphere, so they start interfering
with each other's microwave transmissions and getting into each other's
shadows.
But then the tidal forces get hold of them, as the ones on the side of
the sphere facing away from Earth are in higher orbits than the ones on
the side facing Earth, and the periods of the two orbits are subtly
different. The details of what happens next in a system with dozens or
hundreds of individual satellites in it would take a computer to
simulate, but I don't think their behavior is simple by any means.

* I think this effect was observed with the peeling insulation blanket
fragments on the HST visible during the Shuttle's approach during the
first repair mission. They seemed to be floating in a cloud around the
telescope, rather than either being pulled into it by its tiny gravity
field or drifting away from it due to the influence of different air
drag versus mass characteristics or photon pressure from the sunlight
striking them.

Pat


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...per single launch! Jonathan Policy 244 December 26th 09 10:42 PM
...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...per single launch! Androcles[_23_] History 6 December 23rd 09 06:26 AM
..Space Energy Inc plans to launch prototype Space Solar Power Satellite Jonathan History 10 December 22nd 09 04:17 AM
Retraction of solar array of Zarya module / Expedition 16 /Dawn Mission Post-Launch News Conference John[_1_] Space Station 0 September 28th 07 06:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.