|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Where the nuclear binding energy comes from?
There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull force would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore, gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus and equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy.
Jaakko Kurhi |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Where the nuclear binding energy comes from?
On 1/4/2014 10:23 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:
There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull force would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore, gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus and equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy. Jaakko Kurhi Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Aether seems to defy all the known laws of physics, because it is absolutely everywhere and everything else has to displace aether, making this invisible and undetectable aether a push rather than a pulling force. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Dear Brad Guth, you may have misunderstood the subject of this post. I am talking about a much smaller entity than a helium atom, in this case it can be a nuclear of the helium atom. To be more exact the question is, is it a binding energy or is it a binding force that binds the nuclear of the atom together. For example, Is it nuclear energy or the pull of gravity that can be equal to nuclear energy when the force of gravity works within the structure having no space in between objects. Jaakko Kurhi Last edited by JAAKKO KURHI : January 6th 14 at 06:53 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Where the nuclear binding energy comes from?
On 1/6/2014 10:51 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:
'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote: ;1261145']On 1/4/2014 10:23 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:- There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull force would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore, gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus and equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy. Jaakko Kurhi - Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Aether seems to defy all the known laws of physics, because it is absolutely everywhere and everything else has to displace aether, making this invisible and undetectable aether a push rather than a pulling force. Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Dear Brad Guth, you may have misunderstood the subject of this post. I am talking about a much smaller entity than a helium atom, in this case it can be a nuclear of the helium atom. To be more exact the question is, is it a binding energy or is it a binding force that binds the nuclear of the atom together. For example, Is it nuclear energy or the pull of gravity that can be equal to nuclear energy when the force of gravity works within the structure having no space in between objects. Jaakko Kurhi It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755. Mass is a smallest known and active entity in the universe. The creature who can come up with a formula to convert aether (?) to mass, solves the greatest secret of the universe. JK Last edited by JAAKKO KURHI : January 10th 14 at 03:03 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Where the nuclear binding energy comes from?
On Friday, January 10, 2014 10:01:34 AM UTC-5, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:
'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote: ;1261229']On 1/6/2014 10:51 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:- 'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:- ;1261145']On 1/4/2014 10:23 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:- There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull force would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore, gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus and equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy. Jaakko Kurhi - Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Aether seems to defy all the known laws of physics, because it is absolutely everywhere and everything else has to displace aether, making this invisible and undetectable aether a push rather than a pulling force.- Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Dear Brad Guth, you may have misunderstood the subject of this post. I am talking about a much smaller entity than a helium atom, in this case it can be a nuclear of the helium atom. To be more exact the question is, is it a binding energy or is it a binding force that binds the nuclear of the atom together. For example, Is it nuclear energy or the pull of gravity that can be equal to nuclear energy when the force of gravity works within the structure having no space in between objects. Jaakko Kurhi - It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755. It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755. Mass is a smallest known and active entity in the universe. The creature who can come up with a formula to convert aether (?) to mass, solves the greatest secret of the universe. JK -- JAAKKO KURHI Ether and the Theory of Relativity http://www.tuhh.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html "Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field" The electromagnetic field is a state of the aether. Particles of matter are condensations of aether. Aether has mass. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish. However, the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished; it still exists, as aether. Matter evaporates into aether. As matter evaporates into aether it expands into neighboring places; which is energy. Mass is conserved. When a nuclear bomb explodes matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Where the nuclear binding energy comes from?
On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:01:34 AM UTC-8, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:
'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote: ;1261229']On 1/6/2014 10:51 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:- 'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:- ;1261145']On 1/4/2014 10:23 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:- There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull force would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore, gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus and equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy. Jaakko Kurhi - Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Aether seems to defy all the known laws of physics, because it is absolutely everywhere and everything else has to displace aether, making this invisible and undetectable aether a push rather than a pulling force.- Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Dear Brad Guth, you may have misunderstood the subject of this post. I am talking about a much smaller entity than a helium atom, in this case it can be a nuclear of the helium atom. To be more exact the question is, is it a binding energy or is it a binding force that binds the nuclear of the atom together. For example, Is it nuclear energy or the pull of gravity that can be equal to nuclear energy when the force of gravity works within the structure having no space in between objects. Jaakko Kurhi - It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755. It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755. Mass is a smallest known and active entity in the universe. The creature who can come up with a formula to convert aether (?) to mass, solves the greatest secret of the universe. JK -- JAAKKO KURHI Perhaps entangled photons as representing a 3D photon of nonzero mass may be the required steppingstone between aether and mass. Aether (aka dark matter) may be simply entangled photons. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Where the nuclear binding energy comes from?
On Sunday, January 12, 2014 9:54:23 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:01:34 AM UTC-8, JAAKKO KURHI wrote: 'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote: ;1261229']On 1/6/2014 10:51 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:- 'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:- ;1261145']On 1/4/2014 10:23 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:- There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull force would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore, gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus and equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy. Jaakko Kurhi - Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Aether seems to defy all the known laws of physics, because it is absolutely everywhere and everything else has to displace aether, making this invisible and undetectable aether a push rather than a pulling force.- Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together and there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with anything (not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained) Dear Brad Guth, you may have misunderstood the subject of this post. I am talking about a much smaller entity than a helium atom, in this case it can be a nuclear of the helium atom. To be more exact the question is, is it a binding energy or is it a binding force that binds the nuclear of the atom together. For example, Is it nuclear energy or the pull of gravity that can be equal to nuclear energy when the force of gravity works within the structure having no space in between objects. Jaakko Kurhi - It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755. It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755. Mass is a smallest known and active entity in the universe. The creature who can come up with a formula to convert aether (?) to mass, solves the greatest secret of the universe. JK -- JAAKKO KURHI Perhaps entangled photons as representing a 3D photon of nonzero mass may be the required steppingstone between aether and mass. Aether (aka dark matter) may be simply entangled photons. I don't think we can go further than to say particles of matter are condensations of aether. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Where the nuclear binding energy comes from?
On Sunday, January 12, 2014 7:32:21 PM UTC-8, wrote:
On Sunday, January 12, 2014 9:54:23 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote: Perhaps entangled photons as representing a 3D photon of nonzero mass may be the required steppingstone between aether and mass. Aether (aka dark matter) may be simply entangled photons. I don't think we can go further than to say particles of matter are condensations of aether. Perhaps that's good enough, although quantum entangled photons seem to offer yet another method of creating mass on the fly (so to speak), and at FTL because such entangled photons can be in two or more places at once. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Where the nuclear binding energy comes from?
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:01:26 AM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote:
On Sunday, January 12, 2014 7:32:21 PM UTC-8, wrote: On Sunday, January 12, 2014 9:54:23 PM UTC-5, Brad Guth wrote: Perhaps entangled photons as representing a 3D photon of nonzero mass may be the required steppingstone between aether and mass. Aether (aka dark matter) may be simply entangled photons. I don't think we can go further than to say particles of matter are condensations of aether. Perhaps that's good enough, although quantum entangled photons seem to offer yet another method of creating mass on the fly (so to speak), and at FTL because such entangled photons can be in two or more places at once. There is no such thing as entanglement. Downconverted photon pairs are created with opposite angular momentums. They are detected with the spins they are detected with because they are created that way. Particles of matter are condensations of aether. Aether has mass. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Know your gravitational binding energy from a hole in the ground | Dave Typinski[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | November 23rd 08 04:39 AM |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | [email protected] | SETI | 3 | January 8th 07 11:42 PM |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | [email protected] | Misc | 2 | December 13th 06 01:15 PM |
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy. | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 13th 06 12:37 AM |
The Curve of Binding Energy | Hop David | Policy | 29 | May 19th 06 05:49 PM |