A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hiley refutes Wheeler



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 3rd 07, 05:39 AM posted to sci.math,sci.physics,sci.skeptic,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.astro
Jack Sarfatti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 113
Default Hiley refutes Wheeler

change

There is no Hawking wave
function of the universe in the macro-world, although it is there in
the initial cosmic trigger from the future inflation bubble.

to

There is no Hawking wave function of the universe in the macro-world,
although it is there in the initial cosmic trigger from the future that
retro-causally creates the primordial inflation bubble evolving to the
hot Big Bang whose remnant we see in the COBE & WMAP NASA probes.

Draft 2
On Apr 2, 2007, at 9:18 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:


"No phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is an observed phenomenon."

Hiley shows by explicit calculations that there is no "retrocausality"
in Wheeler's delayed choice experiment nor in the variations with a
maser cavity in one channel of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Even
Aharonov & Vaidman made a mistake there! Hiley totally refutes the Asher
Peres interpretation of quantum theory, though the late Peres was
formidable - a powerful mind. Peter Woit suggest that string theory is
pseudoscience, but Hiley shows there has been a lot of bad mystical
physics at the foundations of quantum theory - that an ontological
reality can be maintained - that Bohr was wrong on that point and
Einstein was right, though many of Bohr's insights survive because the
opposite of a great truth is another great truth.

Thus Hiley's Bohmian analysis is consistent with the no cloning theorem
in which the denial of signal nonlocality imposes strict limits on
imperfect optimal cloning of an unknown quantum bit - something like 5/6
for maximal fidelity of the cloning beyond which one gets signal
nonlocality and true retrocausality as in the remote viewing and
presponse experiments on living matter. This is consistent with David
Deutsch's and Wigner's view that consciousness is a violation of
microscopic quantum theory. Note there is no measurement problem and no
"collapse" in the Bohmian view of micro-quantum theory although in many
experiments it's as if collapse. True retrocausality with signal
nonlocality is a fundamental breakdown microscopic quantum theory's
"sub-quantal equilibrium" (A. Valentini) in which macroquantum
spontaneous symmetry breaking leading to emergent phenomena like
conscious brains and our accelerating expanding pocket deSitter
horizoned universe on the cosmic landscape of the megaverse are prime
examples. There is no Hawking wave function of the universe in the
macro-world, although it is there in the initial cosmic trigger from
the future that retro-causally creates the primordial inflation bubble
evolving to the hot Big Bang whose remnant we see in the COBE & WMAP
NASA probes. The Hawking wave function of the universe is replaced by
the Landau-Ginzburg order parameter that in 3D + 1 is local, which is
why there are no giant Schrodinger Cats. Note however that 2D + 1
boundaries with "anyons" have nonlocal order parameters which have a
hologram nature.

On Apr 2, 2007, at 8:01 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Demystifies a lot of quantum
DelayedChoice.pdf
nonsense not only in pop books, but also in standard text books. Even
the great Wheeler may be wrong about the quantum?



Jack Sarfatti

"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
would it?"
- Albert Einstein
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore...x?bookid=23999
http://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.jack.sarfatti
http://qedcorp.com/APS/Dec122006.ppt
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ausation&hl=en
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lub/sets/72157594439814784


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sean Carroll refutes Waldyr Rodrigues on MOND Jack Sarfatti Astronomy Misc 0 November 1st 06 06:13 PM
s.a.a. Mugshots welcomes Phil Wheeler Martin R. Howell Amateur Astronomy 0 July 31st 06 12:38 AM
Sarfatti refutes Haisch-Puthoff Zero Point Energy Theory [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 January 8th 06 04:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.