OT japans nuclear plant was known to be at risk

On Jan 2, 5:22*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:

well putting multiple reactors close together is obviously poor
engineering.

No, it isn't.

You know, it's amazing how frequently a good position can be arrived
at merely by disagreeing with Bobbert.



take note reactor 4 at fukashima was out of service but destroyed by
reactor 3 explosion

Cite?

Hint: *The hydrogen explosion at Unit 3 didn't even damage the
reactor, other than to blow the roof off the building, much less
'destroy' any other reactor.

Hint: *The Unit 3 explosion was on 14 March. *The explosion that
inflicted minor damage on the outer building of Unit 4 was a day
later.

Hint: *The building for Unit 4 (not the reactor) was destroyed by
three days of FIRES, not an explosion, and certainly not an explosion
IN ANOTHER BUILDING.

It took very little time to find cites for all of the preceding.
Perhaps you should try checking your rants once in a while?

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
*territory."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn

please supply the cites........

and ones from later on, immediately after the accident tepco was
telling people in fukshima stay put all is well, and when they finally
announced evacuate they claimed you will be back in your homes fast,
like a few months.

clearly tepco and the government was lieing, they had to know how bad
it was,'

they claimed not as bad as 3 mile island, and nothing like
chernobyl....
even though fukshima was a level 7 just like chernobyl......

all those who lied really should be charged and proscuted, their
delaying put people at risk of cancer which will show up over a
generation......

the problem is another accident will occur in the future. nothing man
made is 100% perfect.

and again the parties involved will lie putting even more people at
risk......

having groups of reactors so close togther is a bad idea, where one
malfunctioning one can damage adjacent reactors......

better all reactors are in sparsely populated areas, spaced apart
themselves for safety.....

Ideally they should design a reactor that can melt down while
remaining safe and leak free