A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

the 99%



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 26th 11, 01:31 AM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.politics,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy,misc.invest.stocks
Jonathan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default the 99%


"casey" wrote in message
...
On Oct 25, 4:48 pm, Roy Batty wrote:

Objections to the "ruling economic class", or "the
richest 1%", having undue influence on government
policies and that this situation reflects a "failure
of democratic representation" for the middle and
lower classes, or the "other 99%".


That's basically the argument.


As evidenced by the rich getting richer and the middle
class paying more and mo More on housing, more on
food, more on fuel, more on health care, more on
education, more on "luxuries" as in TV, etc WHILE these
companies and CEO's make more and more profits as the
economy is tanking!!! WTF!!! With people working two or
three jobs, if they can get a job, to make ends meet.
FREAKING STAND UP PEOPLE.



And do what?



"First you've got to get mad!"

One of the greatest political speeches in movie
history still rings true today, and ...especially
for this movement.

"I'M A HUMAN BEING GODDAMMIT"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dib2-HBsF08


Do you know why there is an economic crisis?


Who caused it and how did they do it?


The Big Crash was the direct fault of our stupid
political leaders when they passed the massive
rescue bill in Oct of 2008. That set off a panic
in the markets where everyone that could sell
....sold. EVERYONE SOLD AT ONCE.

It didn't have to happen.

I publicly predicted the great crash the Friday
before it happened. The next week saw the biggest
sell-off in the /history/ of the stock market.

.................................................. .

On Friday Oct 3, 2008 9:11 pm I wrote....

"This is a typical panic-sell situation due to the massive
system wide uncertainty concerning mortgage debt.
The cliché "buy on the rumor, sell on the news"
most certainly applies I believe.

The 'news' in this particular panic is the rescue bill.
Which was just signed, making the next few weeks a sure
sell-off, and big time imho. People will look around the next
week or so asking ..."is it over, are we saved?"

"No, not really, nothing much has changed!"
Might be the reply.

And like a shotgun blast to a flock of birds, the panic-sell
will resume, ....and with a fervor not yet seen.
This kind of panic sells always have a false bottom
around half way down. For the Dow it {halfway down}was
just above 11,000, and the Nasdaq at around 2200.

The bottom will be around 8500 for the Dow, and
around 1700 for the Nasdaq ...imho.

I aint getting back in till then."

http://groups.google.com/group/misc....hor:j onathan

.................................................. .............

The following Monday the Dow closed down almost 400.
Tuesday saw the single largest drop in the Dow since 1937
dropping over 500 points for the day. And it dropped an
astonishing 950 points more by Friday to close the week at 8577.
The Nasdaq ended the week at 1690.

My prediction

Dow
77 / 8500 = 1% (error)

Nasdaq
10 / 1700 = .6% (error)

.................................


And guess what set off the panic sell last month?
Yes, a big rescue bill. Both crashed came immediately
after the rescue bills. The difference is this time Wall
Street knew what would happen, yet asked for the
big rescue bill anyway.

Wall Street set off a panic, and cashed in on all the
cheap stock , by ...get this...encouraging our govt
to shower them with our money.

People should be furious, absolutely furious.




s


jc





  #2  
Old October 26th 11, 02:51 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.politics,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy,misc.invest.stocks
Blash[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default the 99%

On Oct 25, 8:31*pm, "Jonathan" wrote:
"casey" wrote in message

...
On Oct 25, 4:48 pm, Roy Batty wrote:





Objections to the "ruling economic class", or "the
richest 1%", having undue influence on government
policies and that this situation reflects a "failure
of democratic representation" for the middle and
lower classes, or the "other 99%".


That's basically the argument.


As evidenced by the rich getting richer and the middle
class paying more and mo More on housing, more on
food, more on fuel, more on health care, more on
education, more on "luxuries" as in TV, etc WHILE these
companies and CEO's make more and more profits as the
economy is tanking!!! WTF!!! With people working two or

*three jobs, if they can get a job, to make ends meet.
*FREAKING STAND UP PEOPLE.

*And do what?


"First you've got to get mad!"

One of the greatest political speeches in movie
history still rings true today, and ...especially
for this movement.

"I'M A HUMAN BEING GODDAMMIT"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dib2-HBsF08

Do you know why there is an economic crisis?
Who caused it and how did they do it?


The Big Crash was the direct fault of our stupid
political leaders when they passed the massive
rescue bill in Oct of 2008. That set off a panic
in the markets *where everyone that could sell
...sold. * EVERYONE SOLD AT ONCE.

It didn't have to happen.

I publicly predicted the great crash the Friday
before it happened. The next week saw the biggest
sell-off *in the /history/ of the stock market.

..................................................

On Friday Oct 3, 2008 9:11 pm I wrote....

"This is a typical panic-sell situation due to the massive
system wide uncertainty concerning mortgage debt.
The cliché *"buy on the rumor, sell on the news"
most certainly applies I believe.

The 'news' in this particular panic is the rescue bill.
Which was just signed, making the next few weeks a sure
sell-off, and big time imho. People will look around the next
week or so asking ..."is it over, are we saved?"

"No, not really, nothing much has changed!"
Might be the reply.

And like a shotgun blast to a flock of birds, the panic-sell
will resume, ....and with a fervor not yet seen.
This kind of panic sells always have a false bottom
around half way down. For the Dow it {halfway down}was
just above 11,000, and the Nasdaq at around 2200.

The bottom will be around 8500 for the Dow, and
around 1700 for the Nasdaq ...imho.

I aint getting back in till then."

http://groups.google.com/group/misc....e_thread/threa...

.................................................. ............

The following Monday the Dow closed down almost 400.
Tuesday saw the single largest drop in the Dow since 1937
dropping over 500 points for the day. And it dropped an
astonishing 950 points more by Friday to close the week at 8577.
The Nasdaq ended the week at 1690.

My prediction

Dow
77 / 8500 = *1% *(error)

Nasdaq
10 / 1700 *= *.6% *(error)

................................

And guess what set off the panic sell last month?
Yes, a big rescue bill. Both crashed came immediately
after the rescue bills. The difference is this time Wall
Street knew what would happen, yet asked for the
big rescue bill anyway.

Wall Street set off a panic, and cashed in on all the
cheap stock , by ...get this...encouraging our govt
to shower them with our money.

People should be furious, absolutely furious.

s



jc- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -




.. . . yeah, blame is easy for the easyover crowd: turning the Stock
Market into a gambling casino had nothing to do with the way itis
now . . . a playboys' toy . . . yeah . . . poormans’ slaver . . .
yeah . . . are we having fun, yet . . . yeah . . . slavery is
fun . . . yeah . . . duh ?

Brother Nathanial:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Eb9bXwKXXw

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + +

Truth will set you free John 8:32

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +

copy to: alt.philosophy, alt.politics, sci.military.naval,
sci.space.policy, misc.invest.stocks
  #3  
Old October 26th 11, 08:32 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy,misc.invest.stocks
Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default the 99%

Jim H. wrote:
Truth will set you free John 8:32


Wonderful quote from one of the least truthful of the gospel writers.


Least truthful? They were all truthful...Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

from God to them to us
;-)
  #4  
Old October 26th 11, 08:47 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy
Lubow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default the 99%


"Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D." wrote in message
m...
Jim H. wrote:
Truth will set you free John 8:32

Wonderful quote from one of the least truthful of the gospel writers.


Least truthful? They were all truthful...Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

from God to them to us
;-)


The Brothers Grimm were a lot more truthful

  #5  
Old October 26th 11, 09:03 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy
Christopher A. Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 69
Default the 99%

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:47:16 -0400, "Lubow"
wrote:


"Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D." wrote in message
om...
Jim H. wrote:
Truth will set you free John 8:32

Wonderful quote from one of the least truthful of the gospel writers.


Least truthful? They were all truthful...Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

from God to them to us
;-)


The Brothers Grimm were a lot more truthful


And a lot more useful. Particularly Jacob who was a pioneer in the
field of linguistics

  #6  
Old October 26th 11, 09:11 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy,misc.invest.stocks
Lawyerkill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default the 99%

On Oct 26, 3:32*pm, "Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D."
wrote:
Jim H. wrote:
Truth will set you free John 8:32


Wonderful quote from one of the least truthful of the gospel writers.


Least truthful? *They were all truthful...Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John..

from God to them to us
;-)


Nonsense, we don't even know who wrote the books and the earliest
copies of Mark stop at 16:8 with the women running away.
  #7  
Old October 26th 11, 09:50 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy,misc.invest.stocks
Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default the 99%

Lawyerkill wrote:
On Oct 26, 3:32 pm, "Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D."
wrote:

Jim H. wrote:

Truth will set you free John 8:32


Wonderful quote from one of the least truthful of the gospel writers.


Least truthful? They were all truthful...Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

from God to them to us
;-)



Nonsense, we don't even know who wrote the books


Luke wrote Luke.

now you know
;-)
  #8  
Old October 26th 11, 10:16 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy,misc.invest.stocks
Lawyerkill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default the 99%

On Oct 26, 4:50*pm, "Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D."
wrote:
Lawyerkill wrote:
On Oct 26, 3:32 pm, "Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D."
wrote:


Jim H. wrote:


Truth will set you free John 8:32


Wonderful quote from one of the least truthful of the gospel writers.


Least truthful? *They were all truthful...Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.


from God to them to us
;-)


Nonsense, we don't even know who wrote the books


Luke wrote Luke.

now you know
;-)


Why don't you forward your evidence to Biblical Archaeology Review and
Biblical Review if you have information on who the gospel were. Maybe
copy it to James Charlesworth I'm sure he would be very interested. I
think he's still at Princeton Theological Seminary.

If you believe your statements on faith, that's fine with me.
  #9  
Old October 26th 11, 10:48 PM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy,misc.invest.stocks
Uncle Vic[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default the 99%

On Oct 26, 1:50*pm, "Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D."
wrote:
Lawyerkill wrote:
On Oct 26, 3:32 pm, "Dr. Vincent Quin, Ph.D."
wrote:


Jim H. wrote:


Truth will set you free John 8:32


Wonderful quote from one of the least truthful of the gospel writers.


Least truthful? *They were all truthful...Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.


from God to them to us
;-)


Nonsense, we don't even know who wrote the books


Luke wrote Luke.

now you know
;-)


Luke who?

--
Uncle Vic
  #10  
Old October 27th 11, 12:12 AM posted to alt.philosophy,alt.atheism,sci.military.naval,sci.space.policy,misc.invest.stocks
Tronscend
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default the 99%


"Uncle Vic" skrev i melding
...


Luke wrote Luke.

now you know
;-)


Luke who?


Luke who's here ...?

T


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.