|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary
Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and
Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ? The French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1794) was the first to formulate a law of conservation of matter in chemical reactions. The concept of inter-conversion of mass and energy has been studied by various scientists qualitatively, even before Einstein. 1. Newton has quoted in his book ‘Opticks’ in 1704 that "Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another...", After about 200 years Einstein derived mathematical equation for Newton’s perception i.e. ∆L =∆mc2 where ∆L is light energy emitted when mass ∆m is annihilated and is speed of light. It is the rarest coincidence in between Newton’s hypothesis and Einstein’s mathematical derivation. 2. S. Tolver Preston proposed that a vast amount of energy can be produced from matter in his book Physics of the Ether in 1875. Preston determined that one grain could lift a 100,000-ton object up to a height dmc2.of 1.9 miles. This deduction yields dE 3. Jules Henri Poincaré in 1900 applied the calculations in a recoil process and reached at the conclusion in the form, mv = (E/c2)c. From the viewpoint of dimensional analysis, E/c2 takes on the role of a ‘mass’ associated with radiation, which yields E=mc2. 4. Olinto De Pretto speculated E=mc2, implying that when v=c , then E= mv2 becomes E=mc2 , in 1903-04. But Pretto neither gave specific derivation nor mathematical calculations. Bartocci claimed that Einstein was aware of De Pretto’s speculation of E=∆mc2 , which was published about a year before. 5. Fritz Hasenohrl in 1904, concluded: “to the mechanical mass of our system must be added an apparent mass which is given by, m=8E/3c2 where E is the energy of the radiation.” In a later paper he further improved result that mass exchanged is, m=4E/3c2. Ebenezer Cunningham in 1914 in the book The Principles of Relativity showed that F. Hasenöhrl, had made a slight error in his calculations. If errors are removed then the mass exchanged is m =E/c2 or E = mc2. Thus in this regard Hasenohrl’s contribution is the most significant, before Einstein. 6. Frederick Soddi and M. Henri Becquerel both have predicted that in radioactive emissions the mass of body decreases i.e. energy of radiations is at the cost of mass. 7. Max Planck in 1907 made an in-depth investigation of the energy "confined" within a body, but he did not use Einstein’s approach at all. Planck derived an expression m-M= E/c2, for heat energy and mass and interpreted that ” The inertia mass of body is altered by absorption or emission of heat energy. The increments of mass of body are equal to heat energy divided by square of speed of light.” Planck acknowledged Einstein’s previous derivation but did not agree with correctness of Einstein’s derivation. Should these scientists be given credit of doing basic work in assisting the discovery of E=mc2 ? Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein. Complied from various sources. If some scientists is left , please add. I think one is JJ Thomson Main sources for compilation 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 _________________ https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary
GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOUR MORON!
AJAY SHARMA wrote: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ? The French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1794) was the first to formulate a law of conservation of matter in chemical reactions. The concept of inter-conversion of mass and energy has been studied by various scientists qualitatively, even before Einstein. 1. Newton has quoted in his book ‘Opticks’ in 1704 that "Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another...", After about 200 years Einstein derived mathematical equation for Newton’s perception i.e. ∆L =∆mc2 where ∆L is light energy emitted when mass ∆m is annihilated and is speed of light. It is the rarest coincidence in between Newton’s hypothesis and Einstein’s mathematical derivation. 2. S. Tolver Preston proposed that a vast amount of energy can be produced from matter in his book Physics of the Ether in 1875. Preston determined that one grain could lift a 100,000-ton object up to a height dmc2.of 1.9 miles. This deduction yields dE 3. Jules Henri Poincaré in 1900 applied the calculations in a recoil process and reached at the conclusion in the form, mv = (E/c2)c. From the viewpoint of dimensional analysis, E/c2 takes on the role of a ‘mass’ associated with radiation, which yields E=mc2. 4. Olinto De Pretto speculated E=mc2, implying that when v=c , then E= mv2 becomes E=mc2 , in 1903-04. But Pretto neither gave specific derivation nor mathematical calculations. Bartocci claimed that Einstein was aware of De Pretto’s speculation of E=∆mc2 , which was published about a year before. 5. Fritz Hasenohrl in 1904, concluded: “to the mechanical mass of our system must be added an apparent mass which is given by, m=8E/3c2 where E is the energy of the radiation.” In a later paper he further improved result that mass exchanged is, m=4E/3c2. Ebenezer Cunningham in 1914 in the book The Principles of Relativity showed that F. Hasenöhrl, had made a slight error in his calculations. If errors are removed then the mass exchanged is m =E/c2 or E = mc2. Thus in this regard Hasenohrl’s contribution is the most significant, before Einstein. 6. Frederick Soddi and M. Henri Becquerel both have predicted that in radioactive emissions the mass of body decreases i.e. energy of radiations is at the cost of mass. 7. Max Planck in 1907 made an in-depth investigation of the energy "confined" within a body, but he did not use Einstein’s approach at all. Planck derived an expression m-M= E/c2, for heat energy and mass and interpreted that ” The inertia mass of body is altered by absorption or emission of heat energy. The increments of mass of body are equal to heat energy divided by square of speed of light.” Planck acknowledged Einstein’s previous derivation but did not agree with correctness of Einstein’s derivation. Should these scientists be given credit of doing basic work in assisting the discovery of E=mc2 ? Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein. Complied from various sources. If some scientists is left , please add. I think one is JJ Thomson Main sources for compilation 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 _________________ https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary
Impeach Bush wrote: GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOUR MORON! AJAY SHARMA wrote: Einstein’s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and Soddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ? The French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1794) was the first to formulate a law of conservation of matter in chemical reactions. The concept of inter-conversion of mass and energy has been studied by various scientists qualitatively, even before Einstein. 1. Newton has quoted in his book ‘Opticks’ in 1704 that "Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another...", After about 200 years Einstein derived mathematical equation for Newton’s perception i.e. ∆L =∆mc2 where ∆L is light energy emitted when mass ∆m is annihilated and is speed of light. It is the rarest coincidence in between Newton’s hypothesis and Einstein’s mathematical derivation. 2. S. Tolver Preston proposed that a vast amount of energy can be produced from matter in his book Physics of the Ether in 1875. Preston determined that one grain could lift a 100,000-ton object up to a height dmc2.of 1.9 miles. This deduction yields dE 3. Jules Henri Poincaré in 1900 applied the calculations in a recoil process and reached at the conclusion in the form, mv = (E/c2)c. From the viewpoint of dimensional analysis, E/c2 takes on the role of a ‘mass’ associated with radiation, which yields E=mc2. 4. Olinto De Pretto speculated E=mc2, implying that when v=c , then E= mv2 becomes E=mc2 , in 1903-04. But Pretto neither gave specific derivation nor mathematical calculations. Bartocci claimed that Einstein was aware of De Pretto’s speculation of E=∆mc2 , which was published about a year before. 5. Fritz Hasenohrl in 1904, concluded: “to the mechanical mass of our system must be added an apparent mass which is given by, m=8E/3c2 where E is the energy of the radiation.” In a later paper he further improved result that mass exchanged is, m=4E/3c2. Ebenezer Cunningham in 1914 in the book The Principles of Relativity showed that F. Hasenöhrl, had made a slight error in his calculations. If errors are removed then the mass exchanged is m =E/c2 or E = mc2. Thus in this regard Hasenohrl’s contribution is the most significant, before Einstein. 6. Frederick Soddi and M. Henri Becquerel both have predicted that in radioactive emissions the mass of body decreases i.e. energy of radiations is at the cost of mass. 7. Max Planck in 1907 made an in-depth investigation of the energy "confined" within a body, but he did not use Einstein’s approach at all. Planck derived an expression m-M= E/c2, for heat energy and mass and interpreted that ” The inertia mass of body is altered by absorption or emission of heat energy. The increments of mass of body are equal to heat energy divided by square of speed of light.” Planck acknowledged Einstein’s previous derivation but did not agree with correctness of Einstein’s derivation. Should these scientists be given credit of doing basic work in assisting the discovery of E=mc2 ? Today, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein. Complied from various sources. If some scientists is left , please add. I think one is JJ Thomson Main sources for compilation 100 Years of E=mc2 https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 _________________ https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 --------------01B7277BADBEEE966D126B0D Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Google-AttachSize: 4251 !doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en" html GET THE **** OUT OF HERE YOUR MORON! br br pAJAY SHARMA wrote: blockquote TYPE=CITEEinsteinâ€?s E=mc2 . Should Newton , De Pretto , Preston, Hasenohrl and brSoddi, Planck be given credit for discovery of E=mc2. ? pThe French chemist Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1794) was the first to brformulate a law of conservation of matter in chemical reactions. The brconcept of inter-conversion of mass and energy has been studied by brvarious scientists qualitatively, even before Einstein. p1. Newton has quoted in his book â€?Opticksâ€? in 1704 that br"Gross bodies and light are convertible into one another...", brAfter about 200 years Einstein derived mathematical equation for brNewtonâ€?s perception i.e. â??L =â??mc2 where â??L is light energy bremitted when mass â??m is annihilated and is speed of light. It is the brrarest coincidence in between Newtonâ€?s hypothesis and Einsteinâ€?s brmathematical derivation. p2. S. Tolver Preston proposed that a vast amount of energy can be brproduced from matter in his book Physics of the Ether in 1875. Preston brdetermined that one grain could lift a 100,000-ton object up to a brheight dmc2.ï?µof 1.9 miles. This deduction yields dE p3. Jules Henri Poincaré in 1900 applied the calculations in a recoil brprocess and reached at the conclusion in the form, mv = (E/c2)c. From brthe viewpoint of dimensional analysis, E/c2 takes on the role of a brâ€?massâ€? associated with radiation, which yields E=mc2. p4. Olinto De Pretto speculated E=mc2, implying that when v=c , then E= brmv2 becomes E=mc2 , in 1903-04. But Pretto neither gave specific brderivation nor mathematical calculations. Bartocci claimed that brEinstein was aware of De Prettoâ€?s speculation of E=â??mc2 , which was brpublished about a year before. p5. Fritz Hasenohrl in 1904, concluded: â€?to the mechanical mass of our brsystem must be added an apparent mass which is given by, m=8E/3c2 where brE is the energy of the radiation.â€? In a later paper he further brimproved result that mass exchanged is, m=4E/3c2. Ebenezer Cunningham brin 1914 in the book The Principles of Relativity showed that F. brHasenöhrl, had made a slight error in his calculations. If errors are brremoved then the mass exchanged is m =E/c2 or E = mc2. Thus in this brregard Hasenohrlâ€?s contribution is the most significant, before brEinstein. p6. Frederick Soddi and M. Henri Becquerel both have predicted that in brradioactive emissions the mass of body decreases i.e. energy of brradiations is at the cost of mass. p7. Max Planck in 1907 made an in-depth investigation of the energy br"confined" within a body, but he did not use Einsteinâ€?s approach at brall. Planck derived an expression m-M= E/c2, for heat energy and mass brand interpreted that pâ€? The inertia mass of body is altered by absorption or emission of brheat energy. The increments of mass of body are equal to heat energy brdivided by square of speed of light.â€? pPlanck acknowledged Einsteinâ€?s previous derivation but did not agree brwith correctness of Einsteinâ€?s derivation. brShould these scientists be given credit of doing basic work in brassisting the discovery of E=mc2 ? pToday, E=mc2 is regarded a sole province of Einstein. brComplied from various sources. brIf some scientists is left , please add. I think one is JJ Thomson brMain sources for compilation p100 Years of E=mc2 bra href="https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554" https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4 554/a p_________________ bra href="https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554" https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4 554/a/blockquote /html --------------01B7277BADBEEE966D126B0D-- Impeach Bush Are you ****ed enough, Come to street, YOU WILL BE ****ED TO SATISFACTION. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary
AJAY SHARMA wrote: self advertisment snipped But it is well known that the paper that you keep self-advertising is all wrong, idiot. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
sci.astro.amateur, sci.space.policy, alt.sci.planetary
Dono wrote: AJAY SHARMA wrote: self advertisment snipped But it is well known that the paper that you keep self-advertising is all wrong, idiot. --------------------------------------- Dono Can you prove it wrong ? I will stop posting. If somebody disagree then one can write to Editor Physics Essays addressing the following issues. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper? What are conditions under which it is derived? What is Planck’s observation regarding it? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? Why Einstein did not generalize the same? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s paper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper. How Editors/referees who have published it are WRONG? How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations AND EQAUTIONS? My paper answers all above questions. It follows from Einstein’s derivation under legitimate conditions,(in some cases) that when Light Energy is Emitted , mass of body INCREASES. It is incorrect deduction from Einstein’s derivation. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work .. A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. .. DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow, (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 ( book will be published in Dec 2006 , by NOVA Science in New York , USA) AJAY SHARMA 5 NOV 2006 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sci.space.policy impact on policy | John Schilling | Policy | 4 | June 23rd 06 02:02 AM |
sci.astro.amateur RTMC group photo | Matthew Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | May 24th 06 02:40 PM |
sci.astro.amateur RTMC group photo | Matthew Ota | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | May 22nd 06 04:36 AM |
SAA's Founders | Ed T | Amateur Astronomy | 55 | January 18th 06 09:30 PM |
sci.space.policy = science fiction | Andrew Nowicki | Policy | 4 | June 22nd 04 04:46 PM |