|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Ugo
writes "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... From Earth and with the nice 8" armature telescopes own by millions of armature astronomers do they take pictures of the Moon? When I was a kid I made a 4" telescope,and went to my roof and just looked at the Moon,every night all summer long. I was hoping to see a new crater. It never happened. Can I ask has there been any new creates on the Moon"s surface in the last 60 years? Bert There have undoubtedly been many craters created in the past years, but all of them are too small to be resolved from Earth. As a matter of fact on November 15, 1953 Dr. Leon Stuart observed what is believed to be an actual meteor impact event on the Moon. Recently I've read they've indeed positively identified the crater created by the impact from high resolution Moon satellite data (could be Clementine, but don't take my word for it). Perhaps someone might have a bit more info on this? I'm fairly sure the "1953" crater has been identified in photos taken before then, so it's no longer a good candidate, but IIRC Lunar Orbiter imaged the crater produced by one of the Ranger probes. The high-resolution cameras planned in the next few years should be able to image the Apollo Saturn IV-B impact craters. -- "It is written in mathematical language" Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Jonathan With the moon being so big and bright with those high
resolution cameras I was hoping they could be motion picture cameras and slow motion on the moon. Possibly a rock slide. The moon having no atmosphere it must get hit very hard,and often. It has to intercept lots of meteors that would have hit the Earth. Rock slides do to small meteorite impacts,and possible from expansion due to fast changes in temperature. Bert |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Jonathan With the moon being so big and bright with those high
resolution cameras I was hoping they could be motion picture cameras and slow motion on the moon. Possibly a rock slide. The moon having no atmosphere it must get hit very hard,and often. It has to intercept lots of meteors that would have hit the Earth. Rock slides do to small meteorite impacts,and possible from expansion due to fast changes in temperature. Bert |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Dick Justice" wrote in alt.astronomy:
Because you wouldn't let him lick yours? It would distract me while taking pictures of moon craters. -- CeeBee Uxbridge: "By God, sir, I've lost my leg!" Wellington: "By God, sir, so you have!" Google CeeBee @ www.geocities.com/ceebee_2 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Dick Justice" wrote in alt.astronomy:
Because you wouldn't let him lick yours? It would distract me while taking pictures of moon craters. -- CeeBee Uxbridge: "By God, sir, I've lost my leg!" Wellington: "By God, sir, so you have!" Google CeeBee @ www.geocities.com/ceebee_2 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
(G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote in alt.astronomy:
Hi Jonathan With the moon being so big and bright with those high resolution cameras I was hoping they could be motion picture cameras and slow motion on the moon. Possibly a rock slide. The moon having no atmosphere it must get hit very hard,and often. It has to intercept lots of meteors that would have hit the Earth. Rock slides do to small meteorite impacts,and possible from expansion due to fast changes in temperature. Bert But no way to be seen with Earth bound telescopes, not even with the Hubble Space Telescope. So it seems we're stuck with making pics of craters. And the M42. And the Dumbbell. And M31. And... BTW:http://pages.towson.edu/astorrs/moon.htm -- CeeBee Uxbridge: "By God, sir, I've lost my leg!" Wellington: "By God, sir, so you have!" Google CeeBee @ www.geocities.com/ceebee_2 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
... Hi Jonathan With the moon being so big and bright with those high resolution cameras I was hoping they could be motion picture cameras and slow motion on the moon. Possibly a rock slide. I can imagine how exciting that would be :-) The moon having no atmosphere it must get hit very hard,and often. It has to intercept lots of meteors that would have hit the Earth. I don't think the Moon has nearly as much shielding effect on the Earth as you might think. Just look up the sky and see the percentage of the total sky area the Moon covers. Pretty negligible, isn't it? For those who think Moon's gravity diverts meteors away from hitting Earth, consider the ones that would normally miss us by a small margin, but hit instead because of the additional pull by the Moon. So in total it's pretty much a null effect. Rock slides do to small meteorite impacts,and possible from expansion due to fast changes in temperature. Bert -- The butler did it. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message
... Hi Jonathan With the moon being so big and bright with those high resolution cameras I was hoping they could be motion picture cameras and slow motion on the moon. Possibly a rock slide. I can imagine how exciting that would be :-) The moon having no atmosphere it must get hit very hard,and often. It has to intercept lots of meteors that would have hit the Earth. I don't think the Moon has nearly as much shielding effect on the Earth as you might think. Just look up the sky and see the percentage of the total sky area the Moon covers. Pretty negligible, isn't it? For those who think Moon's gravity diverts meteors away from hitting Earth, consider the ones that would normally miss us by a small margin, but hit instead because of the additional pull by the Moon. So in total it's pretty much a null effect. Rock slides do to small meteorite impacts,and possible from expansion due to fast changes in temperature. Bert -- The butler did it. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Cee Bee Maybe seeing the motion of shadows on the white surface could
be seen by the Hubble? The best viewing time would be when the sun is close to the moon"s horizon.(very long shadows) I use to do a lot of shadow photography. Is it possible to see the craters on the moon in day light? We can see the moon in day light. Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
Apollo | Buzz alDredge | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 28th 04 10:05 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | darla | Astronomy Misc | 15 | July 25th 04 02:57 PM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |