Is the density of the vacuum increasing?

If the density of the vacuum is increasing, could this account for why
there is a noticable 'speeding up of the cosmological expansion'? Does
ZPE demonstrate an energy relationship to the 5th dimension? Is the
universe undergoing a possible shift into a higher dimension?

---

"AN INCREASING VACUUM ENERGY

An important factor in the discussion then becomes the interval known as
the Planck time, which is the length of time that Planck particle pairs
exist before annihilating. This time interval is governed by the
behaviour of Planck's constant 'h'. Since 'h' is increasing with the
passing of dynamical time, as discussed above, this means that the
Planck time interval is also increasing. In this sense it is rather like
a cheap watch that slows down as its spring unwinds so that the period
between its ticks increases. The function governing this rate of ticking
is the same as the function governing light-speed behaviour. This
effectively means that, for any given constant dynamical interval, more
Planck particle pairs will be in existence per unit volume, as each
particle pair will remain in existence for a longer time.

In order to illustrate this more effectively, consider a unit volume of
space in which the conditions are such that a Planck particle pair
manifests every dynamical second. Furthermore, let the Planck time
interval also be one dynamical second. Thus, at any given observed
interval of one dynamical second, only one particle pair will exist in
that unit volume. Let the Planck time then be increased by a factor of
3, so that each particle pair exists for 3 dynamical seconds. Since
other conditions remain unchanged, a new particle pair will still
manifest every second. Thus 3 particle pairs will exist during any given
dynamical second. First, there is the pair that originated at the
beginning of that interval, just as the situation was before. Then there
is also the pair that originated one second earlier, so that the
observational interval is the middle second of their 3 second lifespan.
Then in addition there is also the pair that originated two seconds
earlier, so that the observational second is the 3rd second of their
existence. It can therefore be demonstrated that if Planck's constant
increases by a factor N, the Planck time interval is also increased by a
factor N, and therefore the number of Planck particle pairs per unit
volume in any given dynamical interval increased by a factor N. All the
effects outlined in this summary then respond as a consequence."

Mo
http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/vacuum.html

Your post seems to be strange at the first glance.
But when I read your article, then it seems that there are some reasons to
support them.

I don't doubt about the 5th dimension. What do you propose it is?
Besides, if you are adding one more dimension to the 4 dimensions as
proposed by Einstein,
then this approach has been tried by others, and appeared to be false.
This theory will predict the fifth kind of force which has never been
observed.



"Mad Scientist" ???
t.cable.rogers.com ???...
If the density of the vacuum is increasing, could this account for why
there is a noticable 'speeding up of the cosmological expansion'? Does
ZPE demonstrate an energy relationship to the 5th dimension? Is the
universe undergoing a possible shift into a higher dimension?

---

"AN INCREASING VACUUM ENERGY

An important factor in the discussion then becomes the interval known as
the Planck time, which is the length of time that Planck particle pairs
exist before annihilating. This time interval is governed by the
behaviour of Planck's constant 'h'. Since 'h' is increasing with the
passing of dynamical time, as discussed above, this means that the
Planck time interval is also increasing. In this sense it is rather like
a cheap watch that slows down as its spring unwinds so that the period
between its ticks increases. The function governing this rate of ticking
is the same as the function governing light-speed behaviour. This
effectively means that, for any given constant dynamical interval, more
Planck particle pairs will be in existence per unit volume, as each
particle pair will remain in existence for a longer time.

In order to illustrate this more effectively, consider a unit volume of
space in which the conditions are such that a Planck particle pair
manifests every dynamical second. Furthermore, let the Planck time
interval also be one dynamical second. Thus, at any given observed
interval of one dynamical second, only one particle pair will exist in
that unit volume. Let the Planck time then be increased by a factor of
3, so that each particle pair exists for 3 dynamical seconds. Since
other conditions remain unchanged, a new particle pair will still
manifest every second. Thus 3 particle pairs will exist during any given
dynamical second. First, there is the pair that originated at the
beginning of that interval, just as the situation was before. Then there
is also the pair that originated one second earlier, so that the
observational interval is the middle second of their 3 second lifespan.
Then in addition there is also the pair that originated two seconds
earlier, so that the observational second is the 3rd second of their
existence. It can therefore be demonstrated that if Planck's constant
increases by a factor N, the Planck time interval is also increased by a
factor N, and therefore the number of Planck particle pairs per unit
volume in any given dynamical interval increased by a factor N. All the
effects outlined in this summary then respond as a consequence."

Mo
http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/vacuum.html

Funland wrote:
Your post seems to be strange at the first glance.
But when I read your article, then it seems that there are some reasons to
support them.

I don't doubt about the 5th dimension. What do you propose it is?

I really don't know. But I think the 5th dimension is similar to our
own in every respect except for one. The universe we consider to be
composed of sub-atomic particles and atoms is more clearly seen as a
hologram, and thus the 'flow of time and space' is more evident as
simply the direction and force of atomic material.

Besides, if you are adding one more dimension to the 4 dimensions as
proposed by Einstein,
then this approach has been tried by others, and appeared to be false.
This theory will predict the fifth kind of force which has never been
observed.

I believe, though I have no proof, that the 5th dimension is seen by
scientists in three (3) observations. First I believe gravity still
exists in the 5th dimension even though its forces remain a topological
consideration. Second muons are the falling particles as they move from
the geometry of the 5th dimension into ours. And thirdly, Zero Point
energy is energy connected to an outside energy reservoir, which is
energy from the 5th dimension. And I guess the concept of 'negative
mass' (perhaps known as dark energy and dark matter respectively) would
constitute a 5th dimensional connection with our dimension, but only
noticed as a time-lag effect. In other words, all physical material in
our dimension is shaped by the worlds of negative mass.

When astronomers see stars which appear to have a 'conic' structure
(stars having a 'tube-like' form and appearance), I believe they are
witnesses to the properties of the 4th dimension proposed by Einstein
and universally known as 'time'. Many of these stars are considered to
be going through a 'birth' phase, but more importantly I believe they
are shifting into the higher dimension, and will ultimately 'vanish'
from the 3rd dimensional view and in that sense are really going through
a 're-birth' phase. Thus 'invisible stars' I believe are just 'on the
edge' of the 4th dimension, that is why we still see their effects, even
though we cannot actually optically observe them, but they are there
nonetheless. Hope this helps in your research.





"Mad Scientist" ???
t.cable.rogers.com ???...

If the density of the vacuum is increasing, could this account for why
there is a noticable 'speeding up of the cosmological expansion'? Does
ZPE demonstrate an energy relationship to the 5th dimension? Is the
universe undergoing a possible shift into a higher dimension?

---

"AN INCREASING VACUUM ENERGY

An important factor in the discussion then becomes the interval known as
the Planck time, which is the length of time that Planck particle pairs
exist before annihilating. This time interval is governed by the
behaviour of Planck's constant 'h'. Since 'h' is increasing with the
passing of dynamical time, as discussed above, this means that the
Planck time interval is also increasing. In this sense it is rather like
a cheap watch that slows down as its spring unwinds so that the period
between its ticks increases. The function governing this rate of ticking
is the same as the function governing light-speed behaviour. This
effectively means that, for any given constant dynamical interval, more
Planck particle pairs will be in existence per unit volume, as each
particle pair will remain in existence for a longer time.

In order to illustrate this more effectively, consider a unit volume of
space in which the conditions are such that a Planck particle pair
manifests every dynamical second. Furthermore, let the Planck time
interval also be one dynamical second. Thus, at any given observed
interval of one dynamical second, only one particle pair will exist in
that unit volume. Let the Planck time then be increased by a factor of
3, so that each particle pair exists for 3 dynamical seconds. Since
other conditions remain unchanged, a new particle pair will still
manifest every second. Thus 3 particle pairs will exist during any given
dynamical second. First, there is the pair that originated at the
beginning of that interval, just as the situation was before. Then there
is also the pair that originated one second earlier, so that the
observational interval is the middle second of their 3 second lifespan.
Then in addition there is also the pair that originated two seconds
earlier, so that the observational second is the 3rd second of their
existence. It can therefore be demonstrated that if Planck's constant
increases by a factor N, the Planck time interval is also increased by a
factor N, and therefore the number of Planck particle pairs per unit
volume in any given dynamical interval increased by a factor N. All the
effects outlined in this summary then respond as a consequence."

Mo
http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/vacuum.html

nightbat wrote

Funland wrote:


"Mad Scientist" ???
t.cable.rogers.com ???...
If the density of the vacuum is increasing, could this account for why
there is a noticable 'speeding up of the cosmological expansion'? Does
ZPE demonstrate an energy relationship to the 5th dimension? Is the
universe undergoing a possible shift into a higher dimension?

---

"AN INCREASING VACUUM ENERGY

An important factor in the discussion then becomes the interval known as
the Planck time, which is the length of time that Planck particle pairs
exist before annihilating. This time interval is governed by the
behaviour of Planck's constant 'h'. Since 'h' is increasing with the
passing of dynamical time, as discussed above, this means that the
Planck time interval is also increasing. In this sense it is rather like
a cheap watch that slows down as its spring unwinds so that the period
between its ticks increases. The function governing this rate of ticking
is the same as the function governing light-speed behaviour. This
effectively means that, for any given constant dynamical interval, more
Planck particle pairs will be in existence per unit volume, as each
particle pair will remain in existence for a longer time.

In order to illustrate this more effectively, consider a unit volume of
space in which the conditions are such that a Planck particle pair
manifests every dynamical second. Furthermore, let the Planck time
interval also be one dynamical second. Thus, at any given observed
interval of one dynamical second, only one particle pair will exist in
that unit volume. Let the Planck time then be increased by a factor of
3, so that each particle pair exists for 3 dynamical seconds. Since
other conditions remain unchanged, a new particle pair will still
manifest every second. Thus 3 particle pairs will exist during any given
dynamical second. First, there is the pair that originated at the
beginning of that interval, just as the situation was before. Then there
is also the pair that originated one second earlier, so that the
observational interval is the middle second of their 3 second lifespan.
Then in addition there is also the pair that originated two seconds
earlier, so that the observational second is the 3rd second of their
existence. It can therefore be demonstrated that if Planck's constant
increases by a factor N, the Planck time interval is also increased by a
factor N, and therefore the number of Planck particle pairs per unit
volume in any given dynamical interval increased by a factor N. All the
effects outlined in this summary then respond as a consequence."

Mo
http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/vacuum.html



Funland

Your post seems to be strange at the first glance.
But when I read your article, then it seems that there are some reasons to support them.

I don't doubt about the 5th dimension. What do you propose it is?
Besides, if you are adding one more dimension to the 4 dimensions as
proposed by Einstein,
then this approach has been tried by others, and appeared to be false.
This theory will predict the fifth kind of force which has never been
observed.

nightbat

Not true Funland, the gravity default force effect is all around
us just not intuitively deducible despite the previous greatest
theoretical analytical minds attempts at unification until nightbat. Why
is this so, because the original or preferred base uniform frame is not
nor has it ever been with us in our space time frame to resultantly
compare to or reference. The elusive base unified field is presently in
a multiple state of non uniform momentum or chaos. While the over
lapping energy and mass states are attempting to renormalization, they
can never achieve base same uniformity due too requirement of reciprocal
equal or greater force to do so. (Newton)

A system in equilibrium stays in equilibrium until another non uniform
force acts upon it. (nightbat)

A system in non equilibrium stays in non equilibrium until an reciprocal
equal or greater neutralizing force acts upon it. (nightbat)

The relative and quantum nature of the Universe multi state overlapping
fields to base uniform one is therefore non frame existent to intuitive
and initial quantification deduction unity. That all energy and matter
is attempting to base equalization is the remnant memory of their
original proper state. A system in perfect uniform momentum requires
less volume then a random disturbed one. That the Universe appears to be
expanding is the effect of non uniform energy and condensed mass
colliding and attempt at reformatting to original unified geometric base
configuration.

The space medium disturbed sub quantum base field (5th dimension),
separate from its natural gravity default effect force, can both
internally spatially contract and peripherally expand infinitely under
present disturbed energy state. However, with input of equal or greater
force, uniformly exist and remain in uniform momentum potential or
depending on the initial or total non uniform input of effected internal
actual state order, present disturbed non uniform constituents including
ultimately return to base uniform state. In absence of equal or greater
force, and mathematical proof of energy/matter indestructibility, the
Universe has always been (no point creation) and always will remain in
disturbed multi state.


the nightbat

nightbat wrote in message ...
nightbat wrote

Funland wrote:


"Mad Scientist" ???
t.cable.rogers.com ???...
If the density of the vacuum is increasing, could this account for why
there is a noticable 'speeding up of the cosmological expansion'? Does
ZPE demonstrate an energy relationship to the 5th dimension? Is the
universe undergoing a possible shift into a higher dimension?

---

"AN INCREASING VACUUM ENERGY

An important factor in the discussion then becomes the interval known as
the Planck time, which is the length of time that Planck particle pairs
exist before annihilating. This time interval is governed by the
behaviour of Planck's constant 'h'. Since 'h' is increasing with the
passing of dynamical time, as discussed above, this means that the
Planck time interval is also increasing. In this sense it is rather like
a cheap watch that slows down as its spring unwinds so that the period
between its ticks increases. The function governing this rate of ticking
is the same as the function governing light-speed behaviour. This
effectively means that, for any given constant dynamical interval, more
Planck particle pairs will be in existence per unit volume, as each
particle pair will remain in existence for a longer time.

In order to illustrate this more effectively, consider a unit volume of
space in which the conditions are such that a Planck particle pair
manifests every dynamical second. Furthermore, let the Planck time
interval also be one dynamical second. Thus, at any given observed
interval of one dynamical second, only one particle pair will exist in
that unit volume. Let the Planck time then be increased by a factor of
3, so that each particle pair exists for 3 dynamical seconds. Since
other conditions remain unchanged, a new particle pair will still
manifest every second. Thus 3 particle pairs will exist during any given
dynamical second. First, there is the pair that originated at the
beginning of that interval, just as the situation was before. Then there
is also the pair that originated one second earlier, so that the
observational interval is the middle second of their 3 second lifespan.
Then in addition there is also the pair that originated two seconds
earlier, so that the observational second is the 3rd second of their
existence. It can therefore be demonstrated that if Planck's constant
increases by a factor N, the Planck time interval is also increased by a
factor N, and therefore the number of Planck particle pairs per unit
volume in any given dynamical interval increased by a factor N. All the
effects outlined in this summary then respond as a consequence."

Mo
http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/vacuum.html



Funland

Your post seems to be strange at the first glance.
But when I read your article, then it seems that there are some reasons to support them.

I don't doubt about the 5th dimension. What do you propose it is?
Besides, if you are adding one more dimension to the 4 dimensions as
proposed by Einstein,
then this approach has been tried by others, and appeared to be false.
This theory will predict the fifth kind of force which has never been
observed.

nightbat

Not true Funland, the gravity default force effect is all around
us just not intuitively deducible despite the previous greatest
theoretical analytical minds attempts at unification until nightbat. Why
is this so, because the original or preferred base uniform frame is not
nor has it ever been with us in our space time frame to resultantly
compare to or reference. The elusive base unified field is presently in
a multiple state of non uniform momentum or chaos. While the over
lapping energy and mass states are attempting to renormalization, they
can never achieve base same uniformity due too requirement of reciprocal
equal or greater force to do so. (Newton)

A system in equilibrium stays in equilibrium until another non uniform
force acts upon it. (nightbat)

A system in non equilibrium stays in non equilibrium until an reciprocal
equal or greater neutralizing force acts upon it. (nightbat)

The relative and quantum nature of the Universe multi state overlapping
fields to base uniform one is therefore non frame existent to intuitive
and initial quantification deduction unity. That all energy and matter
is attempting to base equalization is the remnant memory of their
original proper state. A system in perfect uniform momentum requires
less volume then a random disturbed one. That the Universe appears to be
expanding is the effect of non uniform energy and condensed mass
colliding and attempt at reformatting to original unified geometric base
configuration.

The space medium disturbed sub quantum base field (5th dimension),
separate from its natural gravity default effect force, can both
internally spatially contract and peripherally expand infinitely under
present disturbed energy state. However, with input of equal or greater
force, uniformly exist and remain in uniform momentum potential or
depending on the initial or total non uniform input of effected internal
actual state order, present disturbed non uniform constituents including
ultimately return to base uniform state. In absence of equal or greater
force, and mathematical proof of energy/matter indestructibility, the
Universe has always been (no point creation) and always will remain in
disturbed multi state.


the nightbat


An astute analysis as always, nightbat.

Double-A

no there are vacuum cells and the density varries per per each cell.
You only have to look at our own solar system and compare the conditions
Saturn finds verses mercury or earth the clues are all becoming
obvious now that all the data from saturn is streaming back...the vacuum
is not as hard there as it is round more inner planets. The sun is the
biggest vacuum cleaner in the solar system...satrun is the third largest
one.....The sun sweeps clean the largest volume of space. Jupiter and
Saturn Sweep an already clean region but they still have more cosmic
debris resouces than inner planets. the solar vacuum cell is also
influenced by the sun's cosmic wind which tend to take statistical
trajectory orbits that correspond to major planetary orbit sub cells.
Cosmic wind is yet an other variable that influences outer planets more
than inner ones....

chances are that the center of a galaxy has a harder vacuum cell in
closest proximity to its dense center ...galaxies are probably only
spiral in shape given a time dependent reflection that requires
something more akin to water ice or super saturated space and or some
material interface that can concentrate energy such that it can appear
to reverse the inverse square law and create a 3d structural
apparrition...or so it seems.

The Thermodynamic Cause of Gravity:
Site Below is due for update and removal of mistakes:

http://www.webspawner.com/users/gravity/index.html

gravity jones wrote:
no there are vacuum cells and the density varries per per each cell.

This is covered in the article and suggested.


You only have to look at our own solar system and compare the conditions
Saturn finds verses mercury or earth the clues are all becoming
obvious now that all the data from saturn is streaming back...the vacuum
is not as hard there as it is round more inner planets. The sun is the
biggest vacuum cleaner in the solar system...satrun is the third largest
one.....The sun sweeps clean the largest volume of space. Jupiter and
Saturn Sweep an already clean region but they still have more cosmic
debris resouces than inner planets. the solar vacuum cell is also
influenced by the sun's cosmic wind which tend to take statistical
trajectory orbits that correspond to major planetary orbit sub cells.
Cosmic wind is yet an other variable that influences outer planets more
than inner ones....

chances are that the center of a galaxy has a harder vacuum cell in
closest proximity to its dense center ...galaxies are probably only
spiral in shape given a time dependent reflection that requires
something more akin to water ice or super saturated space and or some
material interface that can concentrate energy such that it can appear
to reverse the inverse square law and create a 3d structural
apparrition...or so it seems.

The Thermodynamic Cause of Gravity:
Site Below is due for update and removal of mistakes:

http://www.webspawner.com/users/gravity/index.html

nightbat wrote

Double-A wrote:

nightbat wrote in message ...
nightbat wrote

Funland wrote:


"Mad Scientist" ???
t.cable.rogers.com

Double-A
An astute analysis as always, nightbat.

Double-A

nightbat
Thanks Double-A and your reciprocal interesting posts I find the
same way.


the nightbat

Hi "All" I find all your posts very interesting. The density of space
energy must be increasing,and the reason this has to be reality is "the
more space the greater its push." Takes more and more energy to
move faster and faster(accelerate) Very possible faster and faster
without limit. We kind of think of this as anti-gravity(not me) One
could easily get a Nobel on showing where this continual increasing
vacuum energy is created. Seems the answer would come out of QM,and not
out of GR. Still Einstein touched upon this with his "cosmological
constant" Bert