|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
*PLUTO* - from Gas Giant to Comet Wannabee [004]
Hopefully, one of the ideas i'm conveying here is that
gradually, over a long period of time, the planet Pluto has decreased in size. ahem Well, not exactly has it decreased in size, of course, but astronomers' estimates and measurements of Pluto's size, in terms of its mass, its diameter and its density have gone from that of a huge gas giant of from 6 to 10 Earth-masses down through a no-atmosphere rocky planet just over one Earth-mass, to its present rather tiny size. Pluto's orbital inclination, or the angle off of the plane of Earth's orbit, the ecliptic, was another nail in the coffin of its perceived large size. Generally, the inclinations of the planets are small. They circle the Sun in so nearly the same plane that if you make a small enough three- dimensional representation of the planetary system out as far as Neptune, it would all fit comfortably into a pizza box. Once more the smallest planet is a bit of an exception. While inclinations are usually 3 degrees or less, small Mercury's is 7 degrees. And if a high orbital inclination implies a small mass, then what are we to make of Pluto's orbit that has an inclination of some 17 degrees? Okay, so there may or may not be a connection between inclination and mass. Pluto's high inclination might not be significant. But once again we are forced to think. Pluto's rotation period also puts its size in question. It has been found to rotate once every 6.39 days. On the whole, it seems that the larger a planet is, the faster it rotates on its axis. With most of the planets' rotational periods being measured in hours (Venus and Mercury are notably much slower, but the Sun's tidal influences are at play), here is the ever shrinking Pluto weighing in at almost a week! This seems to be the mark of a very small planet. Again, this may be a coincidence, but we now have three parameters--orbital eccentricity, orbital inclination, and rotational period--all of which appear to mark Pluto as very small. How far can coincidence stretch? What was needed was a direct measurement of Pluto's diameter. As far away as it was, this was not an easy task. It was tackled in 1950 by none other than the KBO man himself, the astronomer Gerard Peter Kuiper (1905 - 1973). Using the then-new 200-inch Palomar telescope, Kuiper turned it on Pluto and tried to estimate the width of the tiny dot of light. One thing that made it harder was because Pluto's tiny orb twinkles a bit and magnifying its size by telescope also magnifies the twinkles. The best Kuiper could do was to estimate that Pluto's size was 0.23 seconds of arc. Neptune by comparison is never seen as less than 2.2 seconds of arc. Pluto's apparent width, then, is about one-tenth that of Neptune. An apparent width of 0.23 seconds of arc, allowing for Pluto's distance, would mean that its diameter would be something like 6,100 kilometers (3,800 miles). This would make our incredible shrinking planet considerably smaller than Earth. It would make Pluto smaller even than Mars, which has a diameter of 6,790 kilometers (4,220 miles). So now, instead of being the fifth largest planet, Pluto is the eighth largest with only Mercury, among the major planets, smaller. Oops! Not everyone accepted Kuiper's figure. Many scientists wanted to hold on to the "Pluto is bigger than Earth" idea, and measuring the diameter the way Kuiper did it was just not too convincing. However, there *is* another way to skin this cat. In our next article... *PLUTO* - from Gas Giant to Comet Wannabee [005] ....we will see how every once in a while, Pluto, as it moves slowly across the sky, passes near a dim star. If it happens to move directly in front of the star (an "occultation"), the star will wink out for a period of time. Using this method of measuring the diameter, it can be worked out with a fair amount of accuracy. -- happy days and... starry starry nights! Painius |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message...
... Painius writes in message... Pluto's rotation period also puts its size in question. It has been found to rotate once every 6.39 days. On the whole, it seems that the larger a planet is, the faster it rotates on its axis. With most of the planets' rotational periods being measured in hours (Venus and Mercury are notably much slower, but the Sun's tidal influences are at play), here is the ever shrinking Pluto weighing in at almost a week! This seems to be the mark of a very small planet. I think you're reaching a bit there :-) Granted, the giant planets spin very fast because there's no way for them to lose the angular momentum they had when they were huge gas clouds, but isn't Pluto's rotation period the result of being in tidal lock with Charon? If the Earth's moon was as big in proportion the day would be a week or more, and we probably wouldn't be having this discussion. -- "It is written in mathematical language" Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. Excellent point, Jonathan! While i was writing this part, i thought of another reason to think that rotational period is *not* connected with size. While the periods of the gas giants follow the rule of "the smaller, the slower"... EARTH PLANET MASSES ROTATION PERIOD Jupiter 318 9 hours, 50 minutes Saturn 95 10 hours, 14 minutes Uranus 15 17 hours, 15 minutes Neptune 17 16 hours, 48 minutes ....and Mars, considerably smaller than Earth, rotates slightly slower than Earth (24 hours, 37 minutes)... ....the belt asteroids break the rule dramatically. The largest of them, Ceres, rotates on its axis every 9 hours, 4 minutes, and Ceres is a bit smaller than Pluto. A glance at the table toward the bottom of this page... http://history.nasa.gov/SP-345/ch9.htm shows rotational periods of the asteroids to be on the same order as the gas giants, all of them quite a bit smaller than Ceres and Pluto, and most of them spinning about the same speed as--or faster than--Jupiter! So it does appear that, at least in the case of rotational period, coincidence wins. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Do you have yourself a dream? Are you burning with desire? If no dream, you have no steam To fan your ember into fire! Do you have yourself a dream? Paine Ellsworth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message...
... Painius writes in message... Pluto's rotation period also puts its size in question. It has been found to rotate once every 6.39 days. On the whole, it seems that the larger a planet is, the faster it rotates on its axis. With most of the planets' rotational periods being measured in hours (Venus and Mercury are notably much slower, but the Sun's tidal influences are at play), here is the ever shrinking Pluto weighing in at almost a week! This seems to be the mark of a very small planet. I think you're reaching a bit there :-) Granted, the giant planets spin very fast because there's no way for them to lose the angular momentum they had when they were huge gas clouds, but isn't Pluto's rotation period the result of being in tidal lock with Charon? If the Earth's moon was as big in proportion the day would be a week or more, and we probably wouldn't be having this discussion. -- "It is written in mathematical language" Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. Excellent point, Jonathan! While i was writing this part, i thought of another reason to think that rotational period is *not* connected with size. While the periods of the gas giants follow the rule of "the smaller, the slower"... EARTH PLANET MASSES ROTATION PERIOD Jupiter 318 9 hours, 50 minutes Saturn 95 10 hours, 14 minutes Uranus 15 17 hours, 15 minutes Neptune 17 16 hours, 48 minutes ....and Mars, considerably smaller than Earth, rotates slightly slower than Earth (24 hours, 37 minutes)... ....the belt asteroids break the rule dramatically. The largest of them, Ceres, rotates on its axis every 9 hours, 4 minutes, and Ceres is a bit smaller than Pluto. A glance at the table toward the bottom of this page... http://history.nasa.gov/SP-345/ch9.htm shows rotational periods of the asteroids to be on the same order as the gas giants, all of them quite a bit smaller than Ceres and Pluto, and most of them spinning about the same speed as--or faster than--Jupiter! So it does appear that, at least in the case of rotational period, coincidence wins. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Do you have yourself a dream? Are you burning with desire? If no dream, you have no steam To fan your ember into fire! Do you have yourself a dream? Paine Ellsworth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Calendar - July 28, 2004 | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 28th 04 05:18 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - October 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 24th 03 04:38 PM |
Space Calendar - June 27, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 3 | June 28th 03 05:36 PM |
Space Calendar - June 27, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 3 | June 28th 03 05:36 PM |