|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
James Webb Space Telescope Impllication
I saw a TV show on the effects of the Hubble Space Telescope.
It revolutionized astronomy and cosmology. The galaxy field and the nebula field were born anew. The Webb telescope was said to be reaching the boundary of the age of the universe. A scientist promised the new view would startle the world. He did not clarify this comment. He did say that stars are born out of nebula. This opposes the current cosmology of stellar evolution, my comment. If the galaxies simply continue into the past before the birth time of the universe, what does this mean? Are some scientists expecting the big-bang to topple? Is the red shift the only supportive fact of the expansive origin of this universe? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
6 Fun Facts about the James Webb Space Telescope | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | March 16th 10 01:43 AM |
James Webb Space Telescope is a boondoggle | Andrew Nowicki | Astronomy Misc | 38 | February 24th 05 06:48 AM |
James Webb Space Telescope is a boondoggle | Andrew Nowicki | Policy | 37 | February 24th 05 06:48 AM |
James Webb Space Telescope maintenance | Andrew Nowicki | Science | 1 | June 5th 04 06:32 PM |
James Webb Space Telescope | Alan Erskine | Policy | 7 | February 9th 04 11:16 PM |