A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Velocity addition



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 11th 12, 06:12 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Velocity addition

On Jun 10, 8:36 pm, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 6/9/12 6/9/12 8:13 AM, jem wrote:


I do get irritated by your ill-mannered, mid-conversation exits, Roberts,


This is not "ill-mannered" on the scale of this newsgroup. I am merely following
Tom Lehrer's dictum: "People who have nothing to say should at least SHUT UP."


Gee! Tom, so you do take your time to respond to posts that address
your professional integrity. You just choose to respond to the ones
you know that you can manage. The ones not manageable by you are
conveniently kept silent as per Tom Lehrer. shrug

I abandon a thread when I have already said everything I have to say.


Or when it is Koobee Wublee which you know you will be checkmated.
shrug

This is
the only sensible response to fools and idiots who repeat, and repeat, and
repeat the same words and mistakes.


Ahahaha... In case if Tom has not realized, the self-styled
physicists have repeated the same pieces of bull**** for over 100
years. shrug

There is a long list of participants around
here who ALWAYS get the last word,


Yes, Andro the psycho, PD the imposter, Eric Gisse the college
dropout, Paul Andersen the very small professor, etc. shrug

because they are persistent and apparently
have nothing better to do;


Paul Andersen likes to chase after chickens close to the Arctic
Circle. Does that mean anything to you? shrug Oh, the late
Bielowski liked to swim and bragged about swimming naked in public
lakes. shrug

I merely give them that boon as soon as it is obvious.


Or burying your head into the ground like an ostrich. shrug

[...]
humans live by MODELING the world, not by "understanding how it works" (whatever
that might mean -- we understand our MODELS of the world, not the world being
modeled).


Right, so Tom and self-styled physicists have claimed the existence of
this mythic proper time. The Lorentz transform only indicates what
the observer’s time flow and what the remote local time flow of the
observed are. As you know very well, the Lorentz transform works as
it is without the introduction of this mythic proper time. So, where
is the rational basis of predicting the existence of this proper time
thing? And how do you suppose to measure the proper time as an
experimental physicist? These are very fair questions. Why are you
always avoiding answering them? shrug

Recall the Beach Boy song?

“She had the fun, fun, fun, until daddy takes the T-bird away.”

Koobee Wublee’s version:

“Tom has had the myth, myth, myth, until Koobee Wublee takes the
proper time away.”

shrug


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
chip in invisible addition [email protected] Amateur Astronomy 0 August 17th 07 11:05 PM
significant addition to section 25 of the faq heat Astronomy Misc 1 April 15th 04 01:20 AM
significant addition to section 25 of the faq heat Misc 1 April 15th 04 01:20 AM
significant addition to section 25 of the faq heat UK Astronomy 1 April 15th 04 01:20 AM
Telescopic image addition Mike Ruskai Amateur Astronomy 8 April 10th 04 06:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.