|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Could Dragon have been built 20 years sooner?
I could well have been built 30 years later, or not at all, nobody would miss it. might be far less future space activity if space X never existed |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Could Dragon have been built 20 years sooner?
"Helmut Wabnig" [email protected] --- -.dotat wrote:
I could well have been built 30 years later, or not at all, nobody would miss it. hanson wrote: Awww, Wabie, even when you were just 50, nobody missed you? That's a shame, isn't it. But, there are a lot of geriatrics here in these NGs that share your predicament and fate. Thanks for the laughs, though... ahahahanson |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Could Dragon have been built 20 years sooner?
On May 29, 8:39*am, Robert Clark wrote:
On May 25, 3:33*pm, bob haller wrote: was the breakthru just a awesome idea? or breakthus in materials engines etc that made it possible? *Yes, the Falcon 9 and Dragon could have been built even 30 years ago. There is nothing particularly innovative about their engines or stages. They both use methods known about since the 1970's. * *Bob Clark That's exactly true, as is the truth for the ongoing might of our military industrial complex that's still in charge regardless of who we elect or appoint. Actually, as of 40 years ago we could have establish the EML1 with a substantial platform of science instruments, and later having parked our initial space station for roughly 10% the true all-inclusive cost of one Apollo mission. We also should have been dealing with Venus as of more than a decade ago. “Guth Venus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in question: https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...79402364691314 Go right ahead and tell us whatever you can manage to interpret, because if you accept other mainstream media imaging obtained from public funded science that’s of extensively photoshopped, stacked and color/hue saturation modified images that our NASA plus the likes of JPL and ASU gets mainstream published and even into textbooks all the time, then interpreting this one should be quite easy. http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Could Dragon have been built 20 years sooner?
On May 29, 9:40*am, "hanson" wrote:
"Robert Clark" wrote: bob haller wrote: was the breakthru just a awesome idea? or breakthus in materials engines etc that made it possible? Bob Clark wrote: Yes, the Falcon 9 and Dragon could have been built even 30 years ago. There is nothing particularly innovative about their engines or stages. They both use methods known about since the 1970's. hanson wrote: Yeah, there are very few new material/tech novos. It's still all old Penemuende Nazi Rocket Technology, AND... if you guys have ever done any biz with NASA or worked there, it should be clear to you that the breakthrough for Space-X etc is their MO NOT to bloat themselves with nepotistic, corrupt and bizarre bureaucracies which do exist in NASA & & other Govt Agencies, & especially in EPA. Bloating at the expense and demise of others is so redneck American, second only to Americans telling its republic lies. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Could Dragon have been built 20 years sooner?
"Brad Guth" wrote: "hanson" wrote: "Robert Clark" wrote: bob haller wrote: was the breakthru just a awesome idea? or breakthus in materials engines etc that made it possible? Bob Clark wrote: Yes, the Falcon 9 and Dragon could have been built even 30 years ago. There is nothing particularly innovative about their engines or stages. They both use methods known about since the 1970's. hanson wrote: [Added: ... Now SpaceX has successfully completed it first cargo delivery to ISS & returned the Dragon-cap. Kudos. In today's "60 Minutes" CEO Elon Musk said that virtually all tech was "inherited" from NASA. Only the architecture/design & e-stuff was "upgraded"] Yeah, there are very few new material/tech novos. It's still all old Penemuende Nazi Rocket Technology, AND... if you guys have ever done any biz with NASA or worked there, it should be clear to you that the breakthrough for Space-X etc is their MO NOT to bloat themselves with nepotistic, corrupt and bizarre bureaucracies which do exist in NASA & & other Govt Agencies, & especially in EPA. Gay, Black Brad Guth wrote: Bloating at the expense and demise of others is so redneck American, second only to Americans telling its republic lies. hanson wrote: "Bloating"? So, now it's your rnA-R & not any longer your "faith based ZNR atheists" that are responsible for your "Bloating", you sorry obesely bloated gay Black Ass. Gayload-Guth, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Could Dragon have been built 20 years sooner?
On Jun 3, 9:33*pm, "hanson" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote: Gay, Black Brad Guth wrote: Bloating at the expense and demise of others is so redneck American, second only to Americans telling its republic lies. hanson wrote: "Bloating"? So, now it's your rnA-R & not any longer your "faith based ZNR atheists" that are responsible for your "Bloating", you sorry obesely bloated gay Black Ass. *Gayload-Guth, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson How is this helping? Are you saying that government agency bloating is a good thing? What bloated government agency are you in charge of? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Could Dragon have been built 20 years sooner? | bob haller | Policy | 35 | June 6th 12 08:02 AM |
Could Dragon have been built 20 years sooner? | Nomen Nescio | Policy | 7 | May 31st 12 03:53 PM |
Engineer: Star Trek's Enterprise ship could be built in 20 years at acost of $1 trillion | [email protected] | Policy | 24 | May 26th 12 09:59 PM |
Largest APO built in the last ~10 years? | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 16 | January 16th 05 07:05 PM |
Why Wasn't ISS Built Sooner? | Hobbs aka McDaniel | Policy | 6 | January 18th 04 11:37 PM |