#1
|
|||
|
|||
Range violation
I heard about a "range violation" and that was another reason they
scrubbed the launch. It sounded like there was an unidentified boat in the "recovery area." I'm presuming this meant the solid rocket recovery area. Any other info on this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Range violation
On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 19:36:39 -0400, JoKudabada wrote:
I heard about a "range violation" and that was another reason they scrubbed the launch. It sounded like there was an unidentified boat in the "recovery area." I'm presuming this meant the solid rocket recovery area. Any other info on this? With as short as the launch window is, hummm. The boat's been warned, launch over his head. -- Craig Fink Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Range violation
I heard about a "range violation"
1936 GMT (3:36 p.m. EDT) The Range is now reporting there's a boat in the restricted in the waters off the coast that must be cleared before launch. http://www.spaceflightnow.com/shuttl...21/status.html I didn't see an answer on that page about whether they were able to get the boat out of the way in time, although I guess it was a moot point since the weather doesn't seem to have been acceptable at any time in the last hour or more. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SpaceX Falcon Ready to Go. | Ed Kyle | Policy | 50 | December 21st 05 02:46 PM |
High Angle Range WU, what is the highest acceptable design value (PR - telescope)? | Max Power | SETI | 8 | March 8th 05 10:18 PM |
Best way to remove an annoying mountain range? | Guy Macon | Amateur Astronomy | 33 | October 24th 04 06:02 PM |
Space Shuttle | ypauls | Misc | 3 | March 15th 04 01:12 AM |