|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
John Ordover wrote:
We haven't even had to face the social upheavals of "there *is* somebody out there". Unless they show up here, there won't be any upheaval. The world will shrug and go on. Must agree. And even then, it depends on just what they actually do... |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
Cardman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:38:47 GMT, Joann Evans wrote: True enough. Digital and other encoding schemes, even with no intent to encrypt, can look like noise. It is not that bad, when data is always sent at a fixed data rate. So if SETI did ever get an unknown signal (hopefully powerful) with the data being spaced evenly apart, then they would know about it. And of course any wise alien civilization would know to repeat this data. None of this is needed - you can detect a narrow-band signal without any of these conditions. Cardman. -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
Joann Evans wrote:
John Ordover wrote: We haven't even had to face the social upheavals of "there *is* somebody out there". Unless they show up here, there won't be any upheaval. The world will shrug and go on. Must agree. And even then, it depends on just what they actually do... There will be a upheaval - even if a small one - if they turn out to have been around for more than 6000 years or so 8-) -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
cheap quick (quick being relative) is possible - at most you need
controlled fusion - and the key enabling technologies would come not from space travel but robotics and biology. Define cheap and quick. Unless you have FTL travel, you're not fast enough to do anything economically supportable. The higher level of civilisation can merely be defined by forgetting petty issues like economics and doing it. Economics isn't a petty issue. It's a short-hand term for resource allocation. Can a society exist if it begins starving its people to build hideously expensive spacecraft for no viable economic reason? Would you cut medical care to build the ship? Would you starve other investments to build the ship? Etc. etc. If the laws of physics are such that any kind of space travel always takes huge resources and brings nothing in the way of resources back, then even if a society tried to focus on it exclusively, they'd collapse. That's why space travel beyond LEO is, and always has been, and without a breakthrough in physics always will be, a societal hobby at best. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
There will be a upheaval - even if a small one - if they turn out
to have been around for more than 6000 years or so 8-) Not at all - those who believe that stongly that we were created 6K years ago are already disbelieving very real evidence that's not so - they'll just disbelive this too. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
John Ordover wrote:
cheap quick (quick being relative) is possible - at most you need controlled fusion - and the key enabling technologies would come not from space travel but robotics and biology. Define cheap and quick. Unless you have FTL travel, you're not fast enough to do anything economically supportable. Only if you expect inter-solar-system trade in material goods to happen. The higher level of civilisation can merely be defined by forgetting petty issues like economics and doing it. Economics isn't a petty issue. It's a short-hand term for resource allocation. Can a society exist if it begins starving its people to build hideously expensive spacecraft for no viable economic reason? Can you provide a proof that allocating say 10% of resources to such would not be sustainable? Would you cut medical care to build the ship? Would you starve other investments to build the ship? Etc. etc. If the laws of physics are such that any kind of space travel always takes huge resources and brings nothing in the way of resources back, then even if a society tried to focus on it exclusively, they'd collapse. The same applies to the lion share of defence budgets worldwide since mid 1940s. No real collapse in sight. That's why space travel beyond LEO is, and always has been, and without a breakthrough in physics always will be, a societal hobby at best. So? -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
Even without FTL travel, such a short hop would be
quite reasonable for something important -- as surely first contact with an emerging civilization would be. Define short? 40,000 years? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
John Ordover wrote:
cheap quick (quick being relative) is possible - at most you need controlled fusion - and the key enabling technologies would come not from space travel but robotics and biology. Define cheap and quick. Unless you have FTL travel, you're not fast enough to do anything economically supportable. The higher level of civilisation can merely be defined by forgetting petty issues like economics and doing it. Economics isn't a petty issue. It's a short-hand term for resource allocation. Can a society exist if it begins starving its people to build hideously expensive spacecraft for no viable economic reason? Would you cut medical care to build the ship? Would you starve other investments to build the ship? Those are (currently) issues for *this* civilization. Not one that may have reduced interstellar travel to that relative level of effort that homebuilt aircraft/aircraft restoration is for us. Etc. etc. If the laws of physics are such that any kind of space travel always takes huge resources and brings nothing in the way of resources back, then even if a society tried to focus on it exclusively, they'd collapse. That depends on the availability and cost of resources. The future is likely to redefine that for us, it may already have done do elsewhere. That's why space travel beyond LEO is, and always has been, and without a breakthrough in physics always will be, a societal hobby at best. We'll have to agree to disagree on this.... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
NEWS: Many, Many Planets May Exist
Joann Evans wrote:
The length of time they've existed as a civilization still doesn't tell us what they *would* do, it only increases the range of possible things they *could* do, and decreases the ability of younger civilizations to predict what those actions could be..... Agreed. Though there will be some amounts of upheaval caused by just them showing up. But upheaval is not necessarily a bad thing, most of them have led to good results so far. -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UA Scientist Sheds New Lights On Outer Planets With Hubble Space Telescope | Ron | Science | 3 | January 26th 04 01:38 PM |
NASA to hold space shuttle return to flight news briefing | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | November 17th 03 11:01 PM |
First Extrasolar Planets, Now Extrasolar Moons! (Eddington) | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 8th 03 07:06 PM |
Study: Search For Life Could Include Planets, Stars Unlike Ours | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 2nd 03 02:05 AM |
Stars Rich In Heavy Metals Tend To Harbor Planets, Astronomers Report | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | July 21st 03 06:10 PM |