|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
when was it first discovered that Earth's obliquity oscillates?
In article ,
Denis Roegel wrote: I am trying to understand what was the knowledge of the precession of the equinoxes in 1840, and this leads me to search the theory of Earth's obliquity. I need to find out when it was discovered that the obliquity oscillates, and not merely decreases (as it currently does). For instance, the Connaissance des temps around 1840 only tells about a decrease of 48" by century. No oscillation is mentioned. Was it because the oscillation theory was not known? And if it was known, who was the first to publish it and where? The ecliptic that is used in dynamical theories is a secularly changing plane which by definition does not have periodic components. The Earth- Moon Barycentre does meander north and south of this slowly tilting plane of course, by a few arcseconds, and this is presumably what you are referring to. In other words the ecliptic is a sort of moving average. Patrick Wallace __________________________________________________ __________________________ Starlink/HMNAO Internet: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Tel: +44-1235-445372 Chilton, Didcot, Fax: +44-1235-446362 Oxon OX11 0QX, UK __________________________________________________ __________________________ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
when was it first discovered that Earth's obliquity oscillates?
In article ,
Denis Roegel wrote: I am trying to understand what was the knowledge of the precession of the equinoxes in 1840, and this leads me to search the theory of Earth's obliquity. I need to find out when it was discovered that the obliquity oscillates, and not merely decreases (as it currently does). For instance, the Connaissance des temps around 1840 only tells about a decrease of 48" by century. No oscillation is mentioned. Was it because the oscillation theory was not known? And if it was known, who was the first to publish it and where? The ecliptic that is used in dynamical theories is a secularly changing plane which by definition does not have periodic components. The Earth- Moon Barycentre does meander north and south of this slowly tilting plane of course, by a few arcseconds, and this is presumably what you are referring to. In other words the ecliptic is a sort of moving average. Patrick Wallace __________________________________________________ __________________________ Starlink/HMNAO Internet: Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Tel: +44-1235-445372 Chilton, Didcot, Fax: +44-1235-446362 Oxon OX11 0QX, UK __________________________________________________ __________________________ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
when was it first discovered that Earth's obliquity oscillates?
In article ,
Bill Owen wrote: : That's not quite what the original poster had in mind. : If you expand the perturbation equations, you'll find terms containing the sine or cosine of the longitude of the ascending node and of the longitude (or argument) of perihelion. These produce long-period perturbations -- the periods are typically 10^4 to 10^5 years -- and the discovery of these terms is the subject of the original poster's question. The cubic polynomials in T are merely the leading terms of a Taylor expansion. Yes you're right- I was thinking of the short term, over which the operational models of planetary precession are accurate, rather than tens of thousands of years. The best references I've found on the web are these: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/palynolog...climastro.html http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/seasons_orbit.html It seems that some of this dates back to Joseph Adhemar and James Croll in the 19th century, long before Milankovitch. But as Newcomb and LeVerrier were both working from perturbation theory, presumably they knew about the long-period oscillations, and I guess Adhemar and Croll were coming at it more from a climatological standpoint. Patrick Wallace ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
when was it first discovered that Earth's obliquity oscillates?
In article ,
Bill Owen wrote: : That's not quite what the original poster had in mind. : If you expand the perturbation equations, you'll find terms containing the sine or cosine of the longitude of the ascending node and of the longitude (or argument) of perihelion. These produce long-period perturbations -- the periods are typically 10^4 to 10^5 years -- and the discovery of these terms is the subject of the original poster's question. The cubic polynomials in T are merely the leading terms of a Taylor expansion. Yes you're right- I was thinking of the short term, over which the operational models of planetary precession are accurate, rather than tens of thousands of years. The best references I've found on the web are these: http://www.geo.arizona.edu/palynolog...climastro.html http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/seasons_orbit.html It seems that some of this dates back to Joseph Adhemar and James Croll in the 19th century, long before Milankovitch. But as Newcomb and LeVerrier were both working from perturbation theory, presumably they knew about the long-period oscillations, and I guess Adhemar and Croll were coming at it more from a climatological standpoint. Patrick Wallace ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
when was it first discovered that Earth's obliquity oscillates?
In article ,
(Denis Roegel) writes: I am trying to understand what was the knowledge of the precession of the equinoxes in 1840, and this leads me to search the theory of Earth's obliquity. No, I am looking for the discovery of the 41000 years oscillation period, known as the Milankovitch cycle. Who first discovered it? Was it Milankovitch? It's been 25 years or so since I read it, but I recall an essay called "Oblique the centric globe" in one of Isaac Asimov's F&SF essay collections, which dealt with this topic. See http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/Asimov/Asimov.html for an interesting resource concerning the writings of Asimov. Unfortunately, I don't recall which of the many collections it was in! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
when was it first discovered that Earth's obliquity oscillates?
In article ,
(Denis Roegel) writes: I am trying to understand what was the knowledge of the precession of the equinoxes in 1840, and this leads me to search the theory of Earth's obliquity. No, I am looking for the discovery of the 41000 years oscillation period, known as the Milankovitch cycle. Who first discovered it? Was it Milankovitch? It's been 25 years or so since I read it, but I recall an essay called "Oblique the centric globe" in one of Isaac Asimov's F&SF essay collections, which dealt with this topic. See http://homepage.mac.com/jhjenkins/Asimov/Asimov.html for an interesting resource concerning the writings of Asimov. Unfortunately, I don't recall which of the many collections it was in! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Radioactive Potassium May Be Major Heat Source in Earth's Core | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 20 | December 21st 03 10:15 AM |
Radioactive Potassium May Be Major Heat Source in Earth's Core | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | December 15th 03 05:42 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |