|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why is the moon BLUE ?
Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually
deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue worth of raw solar illumination? - Brad Guth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why is the moon BLUE ?
Apparently our NASA/Apollo wizards didn't bother to elaborate as to
how extensive of optical spectrum cutoff filtration is demanded of taking images of our naked and thus unavoidably reactive/anticathode moon, that's also unavoidably saturated in gamma and hard-X-rays. Of course those medium format film cameras and finest available optics were not the least bit outfitted with the likes of such extensive spectrum cutoffs of any mention, and of course that Kodak film was even a little sensitive enough to recording some of the raw UV-a, plus wide open as to any and all of the violet, purple and blue spectrums, yet never once within one frame is there indications of anything outside of a terrestrial xenon arc lamp worth of illumination spectrum getting recorded. In fact, it's exactly as though they were not actually on the moon. Go figure. It looks as though Japan and China were each snookered by those of us having the right stuff. - Brad Guth |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why is the moon BLUE ?
Come on folks, I need all 5 of those nifty Google/NOVA gold stars, or
at least your best consideration as to explaining why our NASA/Apollo wizards along with their rad-hard Kodak film and unfiltered cameras never once offered us any hint of such a bluish/purple and otherwise somewhat violet hue saturated images. While you are at it, you might as well run a version of CELESTIA or whatever interactive 3D orbital simulator that makes yourself a happy camper, in order to explain as to where the heck Venus was, and/or of how the freaking heck they'd managed so nicely at keeping that relatively nearby, certainly of an optically large enough item and looking nearly three fold brighter than Earth as always so gosh darn hidden. - Brad Guth On Dec 7, 11:35 am, BradGuth wrote: Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue worth of raw solar illumination? - Brad Guth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why is the moon BLUE ?
What hurts is our getting duped by the likes of Walter Cronkite in
addition to all of those as supposedly having "the right stuff". Perhaps our investigative Dan Rather can eventually help kick Walter Cronkite's butt on our behalf. Honestly folks, with all of the new and improved science about our moon coming is, there's yet another something of so many other issues that just isn't sitting right with what our NASA/Apollo wizards had been telling us, supported by their army of such brown-nosed minions that reside right here within Usenet naysay land of hosting their government bad deed denials upon denials. It seems their physics and subsequent published science just doesn't add up, pretty much exactly as it never really did, nor do they even have what it takes in the way of any human pilot fly-by-rocket flown lander as of 40 years after the fact. If you don't happen to know anything first hand about photography and the well established science of optical/lens filtering, so that such recorded spectrums of our naked moon isn't getting pushed so terribly off-hue saturated for looking so unusually blue, that's OK because there is more than sufficient expertise with replicated proof of exactly what's going on. Just because our own government has so often lied to us on a fairly regular basis, as such doesn't represent that everything about our government is in the nearest space-toilet, just most of everything associated with those Apollo missions is at full risk of being exposed for what it really is. Of course, all such exposed tips of these sorts of infowar icebergs are clear indications of lots more truth to come. - Brad Guth BradGuth wrote: Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue worth of raw solar illumination? - Brad Guth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why is the moon BLUE ?
Since my Google/NOVA Usenet account is no longer allowing for
subsequent's edits by way of entirely removing postigs with errors, I'll just have to keep adding to the stack as best I can. Sorry about that. What hurts most of all is our getting duped by the likes of Walter Cronkite in addition to our being snookered by all of those as supposedly having "the right stuff". Perhaps our investigative Dan Rather can eventually help kick Walter Cronkite's butt on our behalf. Honestly folks, with all of the new and improved science about our moon coming in, there's yet another something of so many other issues that just isn't sitting right with what our NASA/Apollo wizards had been telling us, and fully supported by their army of such brown-nosed minions that reside right here within Usenet naysay land of hosting their government bad deed denials upon denials. It seems their physics and subsequent published science just doesn't add up, pretty much exactly as it never really did, nor do they even have what it takes in the way of any human pilot fly-by-rocket flown lander as of 40 years after the fact. If you don't happen to know anything first hand about photography and the well established science of optical/lens filtering, so that such recorded spectrums of our naked moon isn't getting pushed so terribly off-hue saturated for looking so unusually blue, that's OK because there is more than sufficient expertise with replicated proof of exactly what's going on. Just because our own government has so often lied to us on a fairly regular basis, as such doesn't represent that everything about our faith-based puppeteered government is in the nearest space-toilet, just most of everything associated with those Apollo missions is at full risk of being exposed for what it really is. Of course, all such exposed tips of these sorts of infowar icebergs are clear indications of lots more truth to come. - Brad Guth On Dec 7, 11:35 am, BradGuth wrote: Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue worth of raw solar illumination? - Brad Guth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why is the moon BLUE ?
That's rather odd, with more of that independent proof-positive that
our NASA/Apollo swarm of Third Reich wizards never set a damn moonboot worth of any human foot on our moon, and lo and behold all of the Usenet lights went out. Wonder what else we've been lied to about? Perhaps Japan and China can accomplish a few other essential items of space exploration which our NASA seems as though so entirely unable to cope with. - Brad Guth |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Think Hoax: Why is the moon BLUE ?
Perhaps instead of another NASA/Apollo hoax, this time it's a Japan/
China hoax that's mutually perpetrated just to make it look as though we've been snookered by our own kind. - Brad Guth On Dec 7, 11:35 am, BradGuth wrote: Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue worth of raw solar illumination? - Brad Guth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Think Hoax as to why the moon is BLUE
On Dec 11, 6:27 am, BradGuth wrote:
Perhaps instead of another NASA/Apollo hoax of those supposed moon landings, this time it's a sneaky Japan/China hoax that's being mutually perpetrated just to make it look as though we've been snookered to death by our very own kind. Is it working? - Brad Guth On Dec 7, 11:35 am, BradGuth wrote: Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue worth of raw solar illumination? - Brad Guth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Think Hoax as to why the moon is BLUE
On Dec 11, 7:19 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 11, 6:27 am, BradGuth wrote: Perhaps instead of another NASA/Apollo hoax of those supposed moon landings, this time it's a sneaky Japan/China hoax that's being mutually perpetrated just to make it look as though we've been snookered to death by our very own kind. Is it working? - Brad Guth Perhaps we should "Think Hoax as to why the moon is BLUE", because if going by whatever our NASA/Apollo wizards are having to say, or rather of their not being capable of telling us much of any honest squat, isn't exactly making for the likes of their NASA/Apollo physics or science of any common sense whatsoever. Also, why is "MI5-Persecution" so ignored, banished or otherwise allowed to be intentionally robo-stuffing the Google/NOVA Usenet with so much useless infomercial/disinformation? At most allowing one such new "MI5-Persecution" topic per day and per Usenet group of supposedly getting nailed by either MI5 or CIA would more than do the trick, that is unless clearing out the likes of whatever I've posted is the actual intended agenda. It would be only too software management easy for those in charge of the Google/NOVA servers of Usenet to moderate such obvious topic index SPAM, at least down to the dull roar of permitting only one such "MI5-Persecution" contribution per any given day, especially since it's just piping out more of the exact same old infomercial stuff without so much as sharing any for real name of the author, other than "mi5-vic" that apparently doesn't actually exist. So, is "MI5-Persecution" simply another insider that's doing their usual rusemaster clown like thing, on behalf of protecting the mainstream status quo? (because that's exactly what it looks like) BTW, our moon isn't really blue unless you are an unfiltered Kodak moment, or that of an insufficiently filtered CCD obtained image. - Brad Guth |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why is the moon BLUE ?
On Dec 7, 11:35 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why does our moon image via Japan and China as though so unusually deep blue color saturated, as having been accomplished with some of the very best CCD cameras outfitted with the finest of optics and sharp cutoff of bandpass filtering for entirely excluding those UV-a and IR spectrums, and even to some extent moderating the violet hue worth of raw solar illumination? - Brad Guth Mention any secondary/recoil worth of that blue looking moon and all the sudden the Usenet lights go out, as though our NASA has pulled the plug and left the building. Same thing goes for mentioning that invisible Venus of their Apollo era. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why is the moon BLUE ? | BradGuth | Policy | 61 | January 14th 08 06:08 AM |
Why is the moon BLUE ? | BradGuth | History | 62 | January 14th 08 06:08 AM |
OT - What if the Moon had a blue light on it? | Jason H. | SETI | 4 | April 3rd 05 01:23 AM |
BLUE MOON IN JULY,search 2x new moon FEB 2052/sky telesc | Don McDonald | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | July 8th 04 03:37 AM |
What if the Moon had a blue light on it? | Jason H. | SETI | 48 | April 20th 04 01:56 PM |