|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ranging and Pioneer
"John (Liberty) Bell" wrote in message
oups.com... Craig Markwardt wrote: .... I refer you to my communications with Jonathan Silverlight, and to gr-qc/0104064 for confirmation that spacecraft transmissions were indeed "switched off." repeatedly (and switched on again successfully). I quote you, personally (from the reference provided by Jonathan Silverlight): "Turyshev admitted two things: the round trip signal time is recorded in some form, but it is not precise enough to constrain the anomaly. Second, he said they did not use that form of measurement technique anyway. As I've already gone into in a different post, I wanted to investigate this more deeply, so I went to a primary document, the DSN procedures manual. I already referred to the table in that manual, where they describe that it takes a certain amount of time to acquire a signal lock, somewhere in the range 0-4 seconds, but perhaps more time, depending on the pre-acquisition bandwidth. Thus, the signal receive time cannot be known to a precision better than a few seconds. Hence, satellite distance discrepancies of 0.5 light seconds or smaller would not be measurable with such a system." Your first paragraph appears to confirm that means to control spacecraft transmissions from Earth do, in fact, exist. Your second paragraph appears to confirm that the lack of accuracy in the already recorded light time data is due to the time taken to achieve a signal lock. The transmitter can be switched off and on but after switching on it can take a long time to lock on. At extreme range a narrow receiver bandwidth has to be used on the craft and the uplink signal is swept through the range of frequency where the craft might be listening hoping it will lock. The time taken depends on the particular frequency hence on the absolute accuracy of the on-board reference. This would seem to suggest that, once a signal lock has been achieved, the primary obstruction to obtaining more accurate ranging data has already been overcome. Yes, a better approach is to consider the switch off transition. Once the uplink and downlink have been locked, there should be a clear indication if the downlink is switched off. One problem is that the downlink keeps lock by using a very narrow bandwidth, probably less than 1 Hz so the response time may be more than a second. Another problem is how it is achieved. For normal operational purposes, they probably had software that would switch the transmitter off and on at specified times to match the ground station schedules. Using that requires an accurate clock on the craft and synchronisation becomes significant. There may not be a command to do an immediate switch off, but again if there were then software response times would need to be deterministic and known. Since the links use forward error correction and possibly repeated commands, it may not be certain which copy of the command caused the transmitter to go off. Whilst it is true that signal levels are, by now, already below the noise threshold, that problem too can potentially be overcome, via the development of still lower noise detectors. Not necessarily, the problem can be that the signal falls below the galactic background. The only way to extract it then is to narrow the bandwidth so that all the signal power is seen but less wideband noise is allowed through. Of course reducing the bandwidth has the problem of increasing the response time and hence measurement uncertainty. George [[Mod. note -- In practice, I think a major issue is that power cycling (and thus thermal cycling) any hardware carries some risks of it breaking. When you've spent 30+ years getting the hardware where it is, you do _not_ want to do anything which would endanger it. -- jt]] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ranging and Pioneer | Oh No | Research | 87 | September 26th 06 09:25 PM |
Ranging and Pioneer | Jonathan Silverlight | Research | 1 | August 1st 06 06:32 AM |
Ranging and Pioneer | Oz | Research | 2 | August 1st 06 06:31 AM |
30 Years of Pioneer Spacecraft Data Rescued: The Planetary Society Enables Study of the Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly | [email protected] | News | 0 | June 6th 06 05:35 PM |