A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » FITS
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[fitsbits] Start of the FITS 64-bit Integer "Public Comment Period"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 7th 05, 10:15 PM
William Pence
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default [fitsbits] Start of the FITS 64-bit Integer "Public Comment Period"

ANNOUNCEMENT: Start of the Public Comment Period on the
FITS 64-bit Integer proposal

This is to announce the official start of the 4-week formal Public Comment
Period on the proposal to add support for 64-bit integers to the FITS data
format.

A detailed description of this proposal is available at
http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_64bit.html. This proposal would basically
introduce 3 changes to FITS:

1. Primary arrays or IMAGE extensions containing 64-bit integer
data type images would be designated by BITPIX = 64

2. Columns in FITS binary tables that contain 64-bit integers
would be designated by TFORMn = 'nK'

3. Array descriptor columns in FITS binary tables with 64-bit
integer array length and heap offset values would be designated
by TFORM = '1Qt' (analogous to the existing 32-bit descriptor
type designated by TFORM = '1Pt').

An archive of the previous informal discussions about this proposal is
available at http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/pipermail/fitsbits/. In particular,
see the postings in September and October 2001, and in April and May 2005.

All interested members of the FITS community are strongly urged to submit
comments pro or con about this proposal here on the sci.astro.fits
newsgroup, or on the related FITSBITS moderated mail list. Following the
conclusion of this formal comment period, it is likely that the 4 regional
FITS committees and the IAU FITS Working Group will then vote on whether to
formally adopt this proposal.

Finally, it would be particularly useful to the FITS committees to get wider
community input on the 2 issues that were raised in the recent discussions
of this proposal:

1) Is there sufficient reason to support 64-bit integer images in FITS (in
addition to 64-bit integer table columns)?

2) Should the 32-bit P heap pointers be defined as positive signed integers
(with a 2.1 GB maximum heap size) or unsigned integers (with a 4.2 GB
maximum heap size)?.


William Pence
Chairman, IAU FITS Working Group
--
__________________________________________________ __________________
Dr. William Pence
NASA/GSFC Code 662 HEASARC +1-301-286-4599 (voice)
Greenbelt MD 20771 +1-301-286-1684 (fax)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Much Longer Can SRians Ignore Their Fundamental Error. Robert Astronomy Misc 133 August 30th 04 01:31 AM
Reading floating point FITS files John Green FITS 34 November 29th 03 12:31 AM
[fitsbits] BLANK keyword misinterpretation Steve Allen FITS 4 November 21st 03 04:42 PM
Rendering FITS Data Grinder FITS 6 October 20th 03 08:29 PM
[fitsbits] proposed FITS MIME types Internet Draft Steve Allen FITS 0 October 1st 03 05:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.