How did Einstein arrive at Time in SRT ?

---- [[[ Potter 1 -:- Sam 0, zero zilch nada ]]]---


Einstein Dingleberry "Sam Wormley" wrote:

Tom Potter wrote:
It is interesting to see that China, Russia and Europe
also do not worry about "relativistic corrections required
of satellite based navigation systems", because they
know that worrying, and using "relativistic corrections"
in their "satellite based navigation systems", is a waste
of time, money and minds.

Einstein Dingleberry "Sam" wormed & wrote:
It's impossible to fool mother nature, Potter, as China,
Russia and Europe are definitely aware. It seems the
only one not aware of the relativistic effects in GNSS
is one Tom Potter. :-o

hanson worte:
Sam, are you laughing about you own fanaticism?
or do you, as a devout Einstein Dingleberry, have
to hang onto the asshair of Albert at any cost, in
order for you to keep on with you worship of Albert's
sphincter, ... even after you read:

http://www.navipedia.net/index.php/R...h_Range_Effect
wherin it says at the outset:
This is a secondary relativistic effect that is less than 2 cm
and thence, for most purposes it can be NEGLECTED.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects...GPS#Relativity
No reference is made for the need of relativity in GNSS.
The actual internal reference of the satellites is 10.22999999543
MHz to compensate for (assumed & adovated) relativistic effects

Sam, go apologize to Potter now. Have some class, Sam.

PS:
.... already 60+ years ago
___ Einstein became a RELATIVITY DENIER __
http://tinyurl.com/Einstein-denied-his-SR-and-GR
but dawn rises slowly over Sam's Marbel Head!...
!