A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Boeing Starliner aerodynamics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 22nd 19, 06:28 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,307
Default Boeing Starliner aerodynamics

In article ,
says...

Saw picture sof the Boeing Starliner mouted on rocket at pad ready for
launch on Dec 20th.

It is wider than the rocket body.


Yes, it's a fairly short hammer head shape.

Out of curiousity, shouldn't the fairing below the starliner gently
narrow from starliner diametre to that of the rocket for aerodynamic flow?


No. There is an atmospheric skirt below the capsule which makes sure
that the shock wave produced by the capsule doesn't impinge on the
Centaur upper stage. Cite:

Boeing's Starliner Atlas V Rocket Ride Is Wearing a 'Skirt' for Launch.
Here's Why. By Mike Wall
https://www.space.com/boeing-starlin...ket-aeroskirt-
explained.html

On a "normal" Atlas V launch, the payload fairing is much longer, so
this simply isn't an issue.

Seems rather odd to see it abruptly end with what seems to be empty
space below it. Is there any explanation for this design decision?


See above.

Jeff
--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
  #2  
Old December 24th 19, 12:05 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,307
Default Boeing Starliner aerodynamics

In article ,
says...

On 2019-12-22 12:28, Jeff Findley wrote:
https://www.space.com/boeing-starlin...ket-aeroskirt-
explained.html


Thanks. So this un-aerodynamic looking skirt changed the airflow to
resolve a shockwave at the bottom of rocket.


It still hits the first stage/interstage. They needed to prevent it
from hitting the Centaur *upper* stage.

Would such a skirt (compared to a smooth fairing) end up generating drag
that is noticeable in performance or is the difference with normal
fairing small enough that it is not an issue?


I realise the skirt is the best solution for airflow further down, but
that doesn't mean it doesn'kt come at a cost. Just curios if this is
significant drag or not.


Not sure. I'm not privy to the results of the supersonic CFD
simulations that prompted the skirt.

Jeff
--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA, Boeing Complete Successful Landing of Starliner Flight Test NASA via sci.space.tech Admin Technology 0 December 22nd 19 05:18 PM
NASA, Boeing to Provide Update on Starliner Orbital Flight Test Status NASA via sci.space.tech Admin Technology 0 December 21st 19 05:04 PM
Crews Named for SpaceX Dragon and Boeing Starliner Flights Quadibloc Amateur Astronomy 0 August 4th 18 03:35 AM
Shuttle Aerodynamics Jim in Houston[_2_] Space Shuttle 17 October 4th 07 11:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.