|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
the "magical" Space forums that make MY "unfeasible" and "non
..
2.5 years ago, in May 12, 2006, I've FIRST published my idea of FAST- SLV shuttle derived "rocket-kit": http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/005_SLVnow.html in the same days, I've posted my idea on several Space forums and blogs and received LOTS of critics and insults from nearly all space "experts" that post on them but... just FOUR months LATER, a FAST-SLV-like concept born on NSF (...) quickly become the (now famous) "Direct" concept, that, in latest two years, several forums and blogs (ran by Direct-guys) try to offer/sell/impose to NASA as an Ares-1/5 replacement... http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/033directstruestory.html then, in my May 21, 2006 article I've proposed aMY 3xSRB "SuperSLV" concept: http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/006_superSLV.html while, in May 20, 2007, I've proposed MY "AresX" concept: http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/029aresX.html both times, the space forums "experts" said me that my proposals was unfeasible, unworkable, non viable, etc. and my articles' links called "spam" but NOW my "unworkable" SuperSLV/AresX concepts (finally) CAN work... NOT since someone have changed something in MY concepts (just an "X" changed to "H"...) but (simply) since (now) MY idea is published (as today's someone else "new idea", of course...) on two "magical" Space fourms: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...7753#msg307753 http://www.space.com/common/communit...yCurrentPage=0 WHEN will MY AresX (now Ares-H...) become the ("original") Direct 3.0 concept??? .. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
MY "unfeasible" and "non viable" rockets'
On Aug 26, 3:30*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
. 2.5 years ago, in May 12, 2006, I've FIRST published my idea of FAST- SLV shuttle derived "rocket-kit": http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/005_SLVnow.html in the same days, I've posted my idea on several Space forums and blogs and received LOTS of critics and insults from nearly all space "experts" that post on them but... just FOUR months LATER, a FAST-SLV-like concept born on NSF (...) quickly become the (now famous) "Direct" concept, that, in latest two years, several forums and blogs (ran by Direct-guys) try to offer/sell/impose to NASA as an Ares-1/5 replacement... http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/033directstruestory.html then, in my May 21, 2006 article I've proposed aMY 3xSRB "SuperSLV" concept: http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/006_superSLV.html while, in May 20, 2007, I've proposed MY "AresX" concept: http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/029aresX.html both times, the space forums "experts" said me that my proposals was unfeasible, unworkable, non viable, etc. and my articles' links called "spam" but NOW my "unworkable" SuperSLV/AresX concepts (finally) CAN work... NOT since someone have changed something in MY concepts (just an "X" changed to "H"...) but (simply) since (now) MY idea is published (as today's someone else "new idea", of course...) on two "magical" Space fourms: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...msg307753#msg3.... http://www.space.com/common/communit...Page=ForumDisc.... WHEN will MY AresX (now Ares-H...) become the ("original") Direct 3.0 concept??? . Ares H is unworkable just like all of gm's ideas |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
the "magical" Space forums that make MY "unfeasible" and "non
On Aug 26, 3:30*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
http://www.space.com/common/communit...Page=ForumDisc.... WHEN will MY AresX (now Ares-H...) become the ("original") Direct 3.0 concept??? never since it won't work. Also there is a post directed at you on the space.com thread. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
the "magical" Space forums that make MY "unfeasible" and "non
On 27 Ago, 03:26, wrote:
Also there is a post directed at you on the space.com thread. not, found... however, if any, it surely is a post of insults against me (like often happens also on NSF...) .. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
15 answers to nonsense being spread by "creation science,""intelligent design," and "Expelled" | Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names[_1_] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | April 29th 08 01:29 PM |
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The ComingRevolutions in Particle Physics" | Autymn D. C. | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 20th 08 07:44 AM |
"Constant failure"; "The greatest equations ever"; "The Coming Revolutions in Particle Physics" | fishfry | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 13th 08 03:38 AM |
The "experts" strike again... :) :) :) "Direct" version of my "open Service Module" on NSF | gaetanomarano | Policy | 0 | August 17th 07 02:19 PM |
"VideO Madness" "Pulp FictiOn!!!," ...., and "Kill Bill!!!..." | Colonel Jake TM | Misc | 0 | August 26th 06 09:24 PM |