Perihelion of Mercury question

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:29:05 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| | On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:33:17 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| | wrote:
| |
| |
| | "Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| |
| | | That's good stuff Bob.
| | | My own simulation of brightness curves suggests that extinction (or light speed
| | | unification, as I call it) takes place over distances that are somewhat
| | | dependent on the period of the orbiting star.
| |
| | Hey ****head! You can't have a velocity curve AND uni****ation,
| | you dumb arse!
| | But then, you've never modelled a velocity curve.
| | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...pheid/Diff.GIF
| | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...d/Velcurve.GIF
| | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...d/RTAurVel.GIF
| |
| | Your phasing is out...
| Your ****in' brain is out to lunch, oh great authority on astronomy
| that has never owned a telescope, you ****in' one-liner response jerk
| just as stupid as Hogbin or Cardinale.
|
| I once had full access to a six inch reflector when I worked at the uni.
| but it didn't have a decent tracking system or a camera. I also helped make
| and use a very advanced solar telescope....so I'm not completely without
| experience.
|

Once upon a time long ago...
Did it live happily ever after?

Y'know, gout might be a good reason to swap your golf clubs
for a telescope or a math course.

If you want to see really faint stars you need to increase exposure
time, and because the Earth turns you need a motor and an equatorial
mount.
What do you think of this:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070102.html

I reckon a giraffe walked in front of the lens.

On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:26:57 GMT, "Sorcerer"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:29:05 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:

| | Your phasing is out...
| Your ****in' brain is out to lunch, oh great authority on astronomy
| that has never owned a telescope, you ****in' one-liner response jerk
| just as stupid as Hogbin or Cardinale.
|
| I once had full access to a six inch reflector when I worked at the uni.
| but it didn't have a decent tracking system or a camera. I also helped make
| and use a very advanced solar telescope....so I'm not completely without
| experience.
|

Once upon a time long ago...
Did it live happily ever after?

Y'know, gout might be a good reason to swap your golf clubs
for a telescope or a math course.

If you want to see really faint stars you need to increase exposure
time, and because the Earth turns you need a motor and an equatorial
mount.

CAN'T YOU READ?
I just stated that, above. "IT DIDN'T HAVE A DECENT TRACKING SYSTEM"

What do you think of this:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070102.html

I reckon a giraffe walked in front of the lens.

BULL!!!!!

MORE PROOF THAT I AM RIGHT.

THOSE INFRA RED BLOBS ARE MY WCHs...

They are the things that all our variable stars are orbiting......WILSON COOL
HEAVIES......

Even your planet Androcles might be amonst that lot somewhere....

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:26:57 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| | On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:29:05 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| | wrote:
|
| | | Your phasing is out...
| | Your ****in' brain is out to lunch, oh great authority on astronomy
| | that has never owned a telescope, you ****in' one-liner response jerk
| | just as stupid as Hogbin or Cardinale.
| |
| | I once had full access to a six inch reflector when I worked at the uni.
| | but it didn't have a decent tracking system or a camera. I also helped make
| | and use a very advanced solar telescope....so I'm not completely without
| | experience.
| |
|
| Once upon a time long ago...
| Did it live happily ever after?
|
| Y'know, gout might be a good reason to swap your golf clubs
| for a telescope or a math course.
|
| If you want to see really faint stars you need to increase exposure
| time, and because the Earth turns you need a motor and an equatorial
| mount.
|
| CAN'T YOU READ?
| I just stated that, above. "IT DIDN'T HAVE A DECENT TRACKING SYSTEM"

Well, Henri, these are not expensive, y'know:
http://www.kitkraft.biz/catalog/Cloc...ft-p-4226.html
Lots of torque, it only turns twice a day. You need another gearbox
to make it turn once a day.
http://www.flying-pig.org/fpWeblog/archives/000034.html

If I were a mechanical engineer I'd have one of these.
http://edwards.web.users.btopenworld...eccanogear.pdf

I suppose being a mere lowly physicist would excuse you...

Don't they have these in Oz?
http://www.china-manufacturer-direct...ime-switch.jpg



| What do you think of this:
| http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070102.html
|
| I reckon a giraffe walked in front of the lens.
|
| BULL!!!!!

Ok, it was a bull giraffe. I can't tell males from females just
by looking at part of the neck.


|
| MORE PROOF THAT I AM RIGHT.
|
| THOSE INFRA RED BLOBS ARE MY WCHs...

Cool, I didn't know WCHs were 100 to 1000 light years in diameter.

|
| They are the things that all our variable stars are orbiting......WILSON COOL
| HEAVIES......

Yeah, big, aren't they, considering the grey blobs are
supposed to be star clusters in the foreground. Definitely god-sized.
I still reckon it's a cow or bull giraffe walking in front of the lens, though.

| Even your planet Androcles might be amonst that lot somewhere....

Nah, Androcles isn't much bigger than Jupiter.
|

On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:57:58 GMT, "Sorcerer"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:26:57 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:
|

|
| Y'know, gout might be a good reason to swap your golf clubs
| for a telescope or a math course.
|
| If you want to see really faint stars you need to increase exposure
| time, and because the Earth turns you need a motor and an equatorial
| mount.
|
| CAN'T YOU READ?
| I just stated that, above. "IT DIDN'T HAVE A DECENT TRACKING SYSTEM"

Well, Henri, these are not expensive, y'know:
http://www.kitkraft.biz/catalog/Cloc...ft-p-4226.html
Lots of torque, it only turns twice a day. You need another gearbox
to make it turn once a day.
http://www.flying-pig.org/fpWeblog/archives/000034.html

If I were a mechanical engineer I'd have one of these.
http://edwards.web.users.btopenworld...eccanogear.pdf

I suppose being a mere lowly physicist would excuse you...

Don't they have these in Oz?
http://www.china-manufacturer-direct...ime-switch.jpg

I don't want a telescope. The one we had at uni was pointed for most of the
time at the nurses quarters of a local hospital.

I can get all the info I need from the 'net.

| What do you think of this:
| http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070102.html
|
| I reckon a giraffe walked in front of the lens.
|
| BULL!!!!!

Ok, it was a bull giraffe. I can't tell males from females just
by looking at part of the neck.


|
| MORE PROOF THAT I AM RIGHT.
|
| THOSE INFRA RED BLOBS ARE MY WCHs...

Cool, I didn't know WCHs were 100 to 1000 light years in diameter.

What do you think accounts for all that DARK MATTER.

| They are the things that all our variable stars are orbiting......WILSON COOL
| HEAVIES......

Yeah, big, aren't they, considering the grey blobs are
supposed to be star clusters in the foreground. Definitely god-sized.
I still reckon it's a cow or bull giraffe walking in front of the lens, though.

No. It's WCHs, somewhat out of focus..


| Even your planet Androcles might be amonst that lot somewhere....

Nah, Androcles isn't much bigger than Jupiter.

It would be if it was all puffed up like foam polystyrene.

"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:57:58 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| | On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:26:57 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| | wrote:
| |
|
| |
| | Y'know, gout might be a good reason to swap your golf clubs
| | for a telescope or a math course.
| |
| | If you want to see really faint stars you need to increase exposure
| | time, and because the Earth turns you need a motor and an equatorial
| | mount.
| |
| | CAN'T YOU READ?
| | I just stated that, above. "IT DIDN'T HAVE A DECENT TRACKING SYSTEM"
|
| Well, Henri, these are not expensive, y'know:
| http://www.kitkraft.biz/catalog/Cloc...ft-p-4226.html
| Lots of torque, it only turns twice a day. You need another gearbox
| to make it turn once a day.
| http://www.flying-pig.org/fpWeblog/archives/000034.html
|
| If I were a mechanical engineer I'd have one of these.
| http://edwards.web.users.btopenworld...eccanogear.pdf
|
| I suppose being a mere lowly physicist would excuse you...
|
| Don't they have these in Oz?
| http://www.china-manufacturer-direct...ime-switch.jpg
|
| I don't want a telescope. The one we had at uni was pointed for most of the
| time at the nurses quarters of a local hospital.

I can fully understand that. Medical research is very important
and begins with anatomy classes. Why would you give it up?

|
| I can get all the info I need from the 'net.

Jeery's third hand crap with velocity and luminosity
showing the wrong phase? No wonder you are struggling.


|
| | What do you think of this:
| | http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070102.html
| |
| | I reckon a giraffe walked in front of the lens.
| |
| | BULL!!!!!
|
| Ok, it was a bull giraffe. I can't tell males from females just
| by looking at part of the neck.
|
|
| |
| | MORE PROOF THAT I AM RIGHT.
| |
| | THOSE INFRA RED BLOBS ARE MY WCHs...
|
| Cool, I didn't know WCHs were 100 to 1000 light years in diameter.
|
| What do you think accounts for all that DARK MATTER.

Santa Claus, perhaps?
I didn't know there was any dark matter, the last I heard galaxies
were spinning too fast because astronomers didn't understand
Wilson time, so they invented more mass to account for it.
You don't understand the importance of Wilson time, old pal.
Wilson time is your greatest discovery, you ruin it with WCHs.
Let's get serious and discuss this further now that you can model
velocities. What is the difference between this set of velocity curves?

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/VC.gif

I've only changed ONE parameter for all them.
You already have the clue with your own actual and apparent
velocity curve.


|
| | They are the things that all our variable stars are orbiting......WILSON COOL
| | HEAVIES......
|
| Yeah, big, aren't they, considering the grey blobs are
| supposed to be star clusters in the foreground. Definitely god-sized.
| I still reckon it's a cow or bull giraffe walking in front of the lens, though.
|
| No. It's WCHs, somewhat out of focus..
|
|
| | Even your planet Androcles might be amonst that lot somewhere....
|
| Nah, Androcles isn't much bigger than Jupiter.
|
| It would be if it was all puffed up like foam polystyrene.
|

On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 07:38:19 GMT, "Sorcerer"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.... wrote in message ...
| On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:57:58 GMT, "Sorcerer"
| wrote:
|

|
| I can get all the info I need from the 'net.

Jeery's third hand crap with velocity and luminosity
showing the wrong phase? No wonder you are struggling.


|
| | What do you think of this:
| | http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070102.html
| |
| | I reckon a giraffe walked in front of the lens.
| |
| | BULL!!!!!
|
| Ok, it was a bull giraffe. I can't tell males from females just
| by looking at part of the neck.
|
|
| |
| | MORE PROOF THAT I AM RIGHT.
| |
| | THOSE INFRA RED BLOBS ARE MY WCHs...
|
| Cool, I didn't know WCHs were 100 to 1000 light years in diameter.
|
| What do you think accounts for all that DARK MATTER.

Santa Claus, perhaps?
I didn't know there was any dark matter, the last I heard galaxies
were spinning too fast because astronomers didn't understand
Wilson time, so they invented more mass to account for it.
You don't understand the importance of Wilson time, old pal.
Wilson time is your greatest discovery, you ruin it with WCHs.
Let's get serious and discuss this further now that you can model
velocities. What is the difference between this set of velocity curves?

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/VC.gif

I've only changed ONE parameter for all them.
You already have the clue with your own actual and apparent
velocity curve.

You are changing the distance. You are going into double imagery.
I can produce the same...however it never happens in the real universe because
of extinction.

| | They are the things that all our variable stars are orbiting......WILSON COOL
| | HEAVIES......
|
| Yeah, big, aren't they, considering the grey blobs are
| supposed to be star clusters in the foreground. Definitely god-sized.
| I still reckon it's a cow or bull giraffe walking in front of the lens, though.
|
| No. It's WCHs, somewhat out of focus..
|
|
| | Even your planet Androcles might be amonst that lot somewhere....
|
| Nah, Androcles isn't much bigger than Jupiter.
|
| It would be if it was all puffed up like foam polystyrene.
|