|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Little Red Riding Hood asks Grey Wolf
Sergey Karavashkin wrote in message m... greywolf42 ) wrote in thread "Myth or Science? (Tired Light)" {snip the references to the other thread, addressed in the other thread} .. You arranged such ceremonies, as if this is of the most importance - and I wonder, what for? What guides your choose when you reject my grounded explanation and mathematical substantiation which you cannot, as far as I know, find in other publications? Or, none the less, you are feeling a wish to find something at least outwardly alike, in order to prove at least yourself that the authorship isn't mine? ;-) Well, Joseph Lazio said you clearly in your thread, there is no phenomenological substantiation for the light 'ageing'. One of attempts to substantiate belongs to V.A. Atsukovsky and is based on his supposition of the aether viscosity. We analyse this substantiation in our paper "On the nature of red shift of Metagalaxy" http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selft...s3.html#hubble to which I referred you, and you shouldn't ignore it. In the view of scientific objectivity, you can only find our mistake, substantiate and show me, in what specifically are we wrong. I'm not Henri Wilson, I will not clutch at a wrong derivation. But I will substantiate. If you are pro such SCIENTIFIC approach, please do answer. I will be pleased to hear from you. I intentionally put these questions to your thread and make a new one, "Little Red Riding Hood asks Grey Wolf", as I want much to hear your answer. First off, I have no desire to tie up my phone line for hours reading your missive. Might I suggest you provide an acrobat version? I did copy the pages one at a time -- then copied the figures. After killing a half hour this way, I noted that your equations are all graphics, too. So I read your abstract, and your abstract contained a very elementary logical flaw. You reference a proof in your paper based on "The alternative theory of the quanta ageing also cannot provide the necessary rigour of the red shift substantiation, since, on one hand, it contradicts the postulates of photon hypothesis..." This is not a scientific argument. Hence, rather than spend another half-hour or 45 minutes trying to download the pieces of your webpages, could you just send me an e-mail with the equation graphics? Thanks, greywolf42 ubi dubium ibi libertas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|