|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I have a query for any nuclear physicists out there.
If the total mass of an atomic nucleus is made up of very small particles, and each particle would have a gravitational binding force, how many such particles would it take to make the total gravitational force equal to the strong force contained in the nucleus?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I have a query for any nuclear physicists out there.
Dear JAAKKO KURHI:
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 5:16:52 AM UTC-7, JAAKKO KURHI wrote: If the total mass of an atomic nucleus is made up of very small particles, and each particle would have a gravitational binding force, Gravity is not a force. how many such particles would it take to make the total gravitational force equal to the strong force contained in the nucleus? The math you need for your answer is he http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_limit And I am not a nuclear physicist, but I was a Radiation Safety Officer (if that matters). Gravity is more than 20 orders of magnitude smaller than the strong nuclear force. So "a lot". David A. Smith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Evidently I didn’t lay out my equation very well, because your answer isn’t related to proposed equation. Allow me to rephrase with detailed explanation: At the very early state when the components for the matter are evolving, the nature has no other as primeval particle to work with as is the mass particle. Even the smallest of all theorized particles the higgs boson, a fragment of proton is mostly made of mass, also the nucleus is 99.7% of mass. So, it should be safety to say that mass particles are the major building blocks in construction of the matter. Therefore, mass and it’s intrinsic property gravity is the only source for all forces and all energy in the universe, including so called strong force. Newton's gravitational constant, Big G was experimentally developed over 200 years ago, at the time the science knew nothing about the solid particle assembly of the nucleus. An assembly where objects are bind together with attractive force, having no distance in between the bundle of objects. So, the gravity within the objects of nucleus is not comparable with gravity in between the objects of matter. Therefore, instead of using the weight of the nucleons to calculate the gravity, the weight of individual mass particle and the number of particles used in the nucleus system construction yield the correct force of gravity. A molecule of matter is a assembly of atoms, similarly the nucleus can be the assembly of mass particles. So, it’s possible using the available nuclear force as a target number and increasing the number of mass particles till the total force of gravity is equal to required strong force. The question is, how to decide the weight of a mass particle which size and density isn’t known. Newton established the Big-G by experimentation, perhaps to experiment by numbers works for nucleus as well. Jaakko Kurhi Last edited by JAAKKO KURHI : June 27th 14 at 04:53 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An SQL Query | [email protected] | Research | 0 | November 1st 07 09:00 AM |
Query | TRIK3R | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | February 14th 07 08:28 AM |
FAQ Query | John D. Tanner | UK Astronomy | 3 | June 12th 05 07:06 PM |
GPS Query | Richard Griffith | UK Astronomy | 0 | December 27th 04 07:59 AM |
sun query | Richard Griffith | UK Astronomy | 5 | June 10th 04 11:21 PM |