|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" wrote:
[snip] http://www.geocities.com/drjosemariachi/jay_faq.html#bb Troll FAQ for Jai Maharaj (Hindi for "cracked athletic cup") His real name is "Jay Stevens" and he runs a scam called "Mantra Corporation." -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
Jai Maharaj is a well known crank. Here is a record of some of his blather in news:sci.physics http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr...thor%3AMaharaj Crank Information and Resources http://www.google.com/search?q=vedic...Awww.crank.net http://www.google.com/search?q=Vedic...www.csicop.org |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
"Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... Jai Maharaj is a well known crank. Here is a record of some of his blather in news:sci.physics http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr...thor%3AMaharaj Crank Information and Resources http://www.google.com/search?q=vedic...Awww.crank.net http://www.google.com/search?q=Vedic...www.csicop.org Sam, everyone makes good and bad posts. I think I made a bad post or two myself. Why don't you post some references to the good posts that folks make, and when you do assert a post is bad, why not explain why you think the post is bad, not with references, but with your won words? As rational, intelligent, moral folks know, criticism of someone or something offhand, tells more about the critic than the thing or person criticized. I think that most folks would like to dwell more on ideas, than learn about Sam Wormley. Why not make posts that address ideas and issues, rather than make posts that inform sci.readers about the prejudices and personality of Sam Wormley? -- Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:21:09 +0800, "Tom Potter"
wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... Jai Maharaj is a well known crank. Here is a record of some of his blather in news:sci.physics http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr...thor%3AMaharaj Crank Information and Resources http://www.google.com/search?q=vedic...Awww.crank.net http://www.google.com/search?q=Vedic...www.csicop.org Sam, everyone makes good and bad posts. I think I made a bad post or two myself. Why don't you post some references to the good posts that folks make, and when you do assert a post is bad, why not explain why you think the post is bad, not with references, but with your won words? As rational, intelligent, moral folks know, criticism of someone or something offhand, tells more about the critic than the thing or person criticized. I think that most folks would like to dwell more on ideas, than learn about Sam Wormley. Why not make posts that address ideas and issues, rather than make posts that inform sci.readers about the prejudices and personality of Sam Wormley? Because they aren't prejudices and personality problems, other than with the spamming asshole who goes by Jai Majaraji. Why are you defending a known netkook and spammer? -- Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253. You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com "Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?" - Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
Because they aren't prejudices and personality problems, other than with the spamming asshole who goes by Jai Majaraji. Why are you defending a known netkook and spammer? Take a look at his website. Then you'll realise it's a bit like Pol Pot defending Adolph Hitler. DaveL |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:35:42 +0100, "Dave"
wrote: Because they aren't prejudices and personality problems, other than with the spamming asshole who goes by Jai Majaraji. Why are you defending a known netkook and spammer? Take a look at his website. Then you'll realise it's a bit like Pol Pot defending Adolph Hitler. DaveL Ah, a kook reach-around. -- Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253. You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com "Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?" - Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
"Dr_Postman" wrote in message ... On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:21:09 +0800, "Tom Potter" wrote: "Sam Wormley" wrote in message ... Jai Maharaj is a well known crank. Here is a record of some of his blather in news:sci.physics http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr...thor%3AMaharaj Crank Information and Resources http://www.google.com/search?q=vedic...Awww.crank.net http://www.google.com/search?q=Vedic...www.csicop.org Sam, everyone makes good and bad posts. I think I made a bad post or two myself. Why don't you post some references to the good posts that folks make, and when you do assert a post is bad, why not explain why you think the post is bad, not with references, but with your won words? As rational, intelligent, moral folks know, criticism of someone or something offhand, tells more about the critic than the thing or person criticized. I think that most folks would like to dwell more on ideas, than learn about Sam Wormley. Why not make posts that address ideas and issues, rather than make posts that inform sci.readers about the prejudices and personality of Sam Wormley? Because they aren't prejudices and personality problems, other than with the spamming asshole who goes by Jai Majaraji. Why are you defending a known netkook and spammer? Hopefully, "Dr_Postman" will point out where I am "defending a known netkook and spammer." I am not "defending" anyone. I am simply pointing out that attacks on messengers, rather than attacks on their messages, tells more about the attacker, than it does about their victims position. And more importantly, the personal attacks of posters instigate flame wars that waste time and resources. I, for one, would like to know that when I download a post, that it has a message, rather than an attack. -- Tom Potter http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:52:28 +0800, "Tom Potter"
wrote: Hopefully, "Dr_Postman" will point out where I am "defending a known netkook and spammer." I had it wrong. You are defending a FELLOW kook. -- Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253. You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com "Did the Venus transit occur during sunset, idiot?" - Grant,on the GLP web board, explains to us how sunrise happens in NY and Asia at the same time. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lockheed Martin scores success with landing technology tests for a future astronaut crew | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 4 | July 21st 04 03:44 AM |
Reviewing the past 12 monyhs, KSC enters 2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 24th 03 03:32 PM |
Our future as a species - Fermi Paradox revisted - Where they all are | william mook | Policy | 157 | November 19th 03 12:19 AM |
NASA's International Space Station Science control center updates information technology while cutting costs | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | October 3rd 03 06:42 PM |
New UK technology will make the first global X-ray map of the Moon(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 22nd 03 02:09 AM |