|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
Now we have the secondary or backup plan-B as our faith based
alternative, such as lord/wizard "dan@" in full support of their singular BIG-BANG holy grail, of such Old Testament thumping folks claiming and/or perhaps as a Jewish form of ranting on behalf of an electromagnetic or galactic black hole magnetosphere analogy "The galaxy is a zero point machine producing mass, energy and spawns new galaxies from vacuum energy", as being in charge of their forever expanding universe that's somehow limited as to being their "one endless universe", and thereby obviously representing the one and only such universe in their mostly Old Testament certified town. The jest of their analogy or rant on behalf of such magnetic energy being a stronger than or at least of equal force to that of gravity, of which I obviously don't exactly buy into because, it simply isn't cosure within the regular laws of their own physics, nor can this otherwise be forced via lab substantiations any better off than physics or independent replicated science can support our having walked on the moon, or for that matter of our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) having claimed Islamics or whatever weird postal going Muslims actually had any of those pesky WMD at their disposal, much less having the intent to have used such WMD simply because we're so good at having been keeping such nonjewish folks in such a nifty servitude or nearly slave like existence, while we manage to suck down most of their energy resources like there's no tomorrow, and at the same time deny their access to utilizing nuclear derived energy. At least the few and far between honest likes of "malibu" are still sharing in common sense that also works entirely within the regular laws of physics. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...5cbe54bb01c5d9 Galaxies do not grow any more than atoms grow (i.e. in extreme fusion events). Galaxies do not beget galaxies any more than atoms beget atoms. It takes extreme energy events to produce both and these happen only in certain places in the Universe. Another nifty tidbit of information that's worth our knowing about. http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2000/v4641/ "Scientists have discovered the closest black hole yet, a mere 1,600 light years from Earth. Its discovery was heralded by four of the most dramatic rapid X-ray intensity changes ever seen from one star." The mass of that black hole, if it were instead to be compared as being merely equal to whatever the entire Sirius star/(solar system) plus its Kuiper belt and Oort cloud of combined gravitational influence upon us amounts to, would as such need to become 34,596 fold greater than the total worth of all that's Sirius, or roughly 103,788 times worthy of greater mass than the sum total of our wussy little solar system. Fortunately, it is simply not anywhere nearly as massive as it would need to be. "In galaxy-core quasars, the black holes are millions of times more massive than the Sun; in the more nearby microquasars the black holes are roughly three to twenty times more massive than the Sun." Twenty fold worth of solar mass units simply isn't hardly worth all that much potential influence at 1,600 light years from our sol. The nearby black hole or microquasar of V4641 at 8.73 ~ 11.70 solar mass simply isn't worthy of most any given argument with respect to such a minor black hole mass having an influence upon our meager existence, that is unless the microquasar magnetosphere was at least a million fold more robust per given density of its stellar like mass, than otherwise being the likely case. So, that pretty much leaves us stuck with and/or as having been influenced by the likes of the nearly 3X massive and otherwise absolutely terrific energy worth of the extremely nearby Sirius star/solar system. There's more than enough gravity existing between sol and Sirius to being measurable, and there's enough greater combined mass and thereby force of gravity associated with Sirius in order to insure that we're the ones being pulled along and doing the orbiting, such as once every 105,000 ~ 110,000 some odd years at this galactic time (our having more frequent orbital cycles as we go back in time). Unfortunately, the Sirius star/solar system is sequestered deep within this mostly anti-think-tank naysay land, of Usenet banishment or simply of whatever evidence exclusion accomplishes the trick of keeping that mainstream good ship LOLLIPOP of theirs from excessively rocking. There's not all that much question that our many ice ages and subsequent thawing cycles had been directly related to our orbiting of Sirius, with the minor exception as having been taking place from the very last ice age and ongoing thaw this Earth will ever see, as being primarily due to our having obtained that nifty but rather GW trauma causing moon, of which its lithobraking arrival is what also managed to force mother Earth out of a somewhat elliptical moduated monoseason with merely a solar forced tide, and ever since into having a rather good deal of seasonal tilt and somewhat terrific moon forced tides (especially at first). - Brad Guth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
That's what I'd thought. You folks allow another Jew to spout off
anything that's in any way supporting of your singular cosmic BIG BANG, and/or of your forever expanding singular universe, without giving it your usual benefit of the typical topic/author stalking or bashings. Apparently butt sucking up to your Old Testament mindset is what works each and every time, even if those notions or whatever infomercial crapolla are simply dead wrong. - Brad Guth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
On Mar 25, 11:19 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
And you never did answer whether you can breathe poison at 800F... That's being rather naysay silly; Do submarine crews need to breath salt water? Do those ISS/ESS crew members need to survive upon their having to breath vacuum? Do the seriously dumb and dumber folks like yourself require others in order to wipe your infomercial spewing butts? Is your intellectual bigotry and other arrogance because of incest, or is it all because of some other Old Testament faith-based crapolla? - Brad Guth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
In sci.physics,
wrote on 25 Mar 2007 12:58:58 -0700 . com: On Mar 25, 11:19 am, Bob Casanova wrote: And you never did answer whether you can breathe poison at 800F... That's being rather naysay silly; Do submarine crews need to breath salt water? Do those ISS/ESS crew members need to survive upon their having to breath vacuum? They won't be breathing anyway. The radiation will get them long before the air gives out. Do the seriously dumb and dumber folks like yourself require others in order to wipe your infomercial spewing butts? Is your intellectual bigotry and other arrogance because of incest, or is it all because of some other Old Testament faith-based crapolla? - Brad Guth -- #191, Windows Vista. It'll Fix Everything(tm). -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
On Mar 25, 1:15 pm, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote: In sci.physics, wrote Do those ISS/ESS crew members need to survive upon their having to breath vacuum? They won't be breathing anyway. The radiation will get them long before the air gives out. That's rather silly, unless you're talking about their being in a nasty lunar orbit. Venus on the other hand is better off than Earth at protecting our frail DNA from cosmic and solar rads. - Brad Guth |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
In sci.physics,
wrote on 26 Mar 2007 01:36:28 -0700 .com: On Mar 25, 1:15 pm, The Ghost In The Machine wrote: In sci.physics, wrote Do those ISS/ESS crew members need to survive upon their having to breath vacuum? They won't be breathing anyway. The radiation will get them long before the air gives out. That's rather silly, unless you're talking about their being in a nasty lunar orbit. Venus on the other hand is better off than Earth at protecting our frail DNA from cosmic and solar rads. And how do they get there without getting fried, again? - Brad Guth -- #191, New Technology? Not There. No Thanks. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:15:11 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by The Ghost In The Machine : In sci.physics, wrote on 25 Mar 2007 12:58:58 -0700 .com: On Mar 25, 11:19 am, Bob Casanova wrote: And you never did answer whether you can breathe poison at 800F... That's being rather naysay silly; Do submarine crews need to breath salt water? Do those ISS/ESS crew members need to survive upon their having to breath vacuum? They won't be breathing anyway. The radiation will get them long before the air gives out. Doesn't seem to have happened so far... Do the seriously dumb and dumber folks like yourself require others in order to wipe your infomercial spewing butts? Is your intellectual bigotry and other arrogance because of incest, or is it all because of some other Old Testament faith-based crapolla? - Brad Guth -- #191, Windows Vista. It'll Fix Everything(tm). -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge?
I can actually see all the mainstream crapolla hitting that status quo
or bust ceiling fan, not to mention seeing all of those brown-nosed minions as MI/NSA clowns running a amock. In spite of all the incoming flak that I'm taking on, I would have to think gravity is in charge, and that's not hardly by any small margin. Even a black hole's magnetosphere is no significant match against the good old force of gravity. For instance, our physically dark and massive moon that's having been somewhat recently orbiting us so nearby (ever since the last ice age), and thereby having unavoidably caused so much GW trauma into our environment, and otherwise having applied tidal and gravitational energy into the planetology that's below our two left dumbfounded feet, is simply a much hotter environment in a very DNA lethal rad/rem TBI sort of way, as having been more so nasty than any portion of the Van Allen belts could ever hope to become. We can all thank the god(s) of gravity and physics for having accomplished that task, of our moon having been and still being the great reactive collector or morgue of all that's solar and cosmic, plus hosting whatever's radioactive about itself. - Brad Guth |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Magnetosphere or Gravity; which is in charge? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 17 | April 8th 07 03:31 AM |
Dark energy, gravity, gravity pressure, gravity bubbles, a theory | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 3rd 07 11:03 PM |
Earth's magnetosphere | maximus22 | Misc | 1 | November 21st 05 07:49 PM |
Magnetosphere of Sun | Jim | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 8th 05 07:09 PM |
Magnetosphere resonances | Robert Martin | Astronomy Misc | 1 | January 13th 05 10:31 PM |