|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Information cannot leave a blackhole
If we say information can not get out of a blackhole now, we are
supposedly wrong because Hawking admitted he wrong. That is being a little bit sycophantic to the nth degre. At one time if you said there were many dimensions, you were called a kook by ofcourse the wannabe thinker sycophants. At one time if you said there were other star systems with planets, you were called a kook and loon. Until they were discovered....now all the sycophants agree together that there are other planets. If you suggestd that light is not the fastest speed in the universe..you were called moron, idiot, kook, loon..etc. Now ofcourse its "acceptable" to suggest that. Hawking is just another sycophant with a whole troup following behind him, applauding as he goes. He was wrong before, what if he changes his mind again? Will the world go back to saying information can't get out of a black hole? Sycophants do not change, they remain ass kissers their whole life and I suppose they would go back to the latter because they don't think for themselves. Others do their thinking for them. Its funny, I wrote a book years ago, published it and in my book I state exactly that information can get out of black holes. Now that Hawking has got all the sycophants salivating, I can prove that I am smarter than Hawking? Hardly, the sycophants don't reconize original thinkers, because you have to climb the sycophantic kiss arse ladder in order to be accepted. Thats what Marxist/Leninist wanted when they founded their communist system, which the United Nations has embraced and it seems every sycophantic university and college out there. I love making sycophants my personal lab rats. It is fun to watch them salivate when I ring the bell. Hawking said it and recanted, but its ok...he's kissed enough asses along the way. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Aunt Buffy wrote: This is my view of the situation. Hawking said one thing. Other scientists disagreed. Each put forward his "proof". Scientists poured over the proofs and some stated their opinions. On the topic of information escape from a black hole...opinions were divided. Seems dualistic enslavement exists even in the scientific community. Yet why the perceived 'breakthroughs' are always met with almost complete hostility? Science is basically stifled because open ended thinking is insulted. i.e., How dare you ask an original question, what are you stupid, etc. etc. Skeptics are extremely hostile with no degrees of freedom to even question. Face reality skeptics don't ask very many questions because they are too afraid to be insulted, great way to 'teach' a new generation of astronomers and cosmologists. NOT! The new generation of discovery is not being led by academia, period. Skeptics dont push the envelope, period. This thinking is destroying our civlization because it affects all levels of how we order society. Society is doomed to failure and ultimate extinction or be replaced by something better, producing true longevity instead of 'black hole' end periods. Much of the worlds problems right now..rest upon the shoulders of our scientists. If they don't willingly change as a collective, and admit their mistakes and coverups, and ask the Higher Intelligence for help, I suppose that the fall of these "masters of the universe" will be great, but not without effecting all life on earth. But it's not just about how good a scientist your are in your own head...it's also about how good you are at explaining yourself to your peers and to the layman. There are lots of the former but its the latter that get heard. I have no problem with that at all. Explanation is far removed from things like the BB model. Especially when you consider Life and its Divine origins. "Yoda" wrote in message news If we say information can not get out of a blackhole now, we are supposedly wrong because Hawking admitted he wrong. That is being a little bit sycophantic to the nth degre. At one time if you said there were many dimensions, you were called a kook by ofcourse the wannabe thinker sycophants. At one time if you said there were other star systems with planets, you were called a kook and loon. Until they were discovered....now all the sycophants agree together that there are other planets. If you suggestd that light is not the fastest speed in the universe..you were called moron, idiot, kook, loon..etc. Now ofcourse its "acceptable" to suggest that. Hawking is just another sycophant with a whole troup following behind him, applauding as he goes. He was wrong before, what if he changes his mind again? Will the world go back to saying information can't get out of a black hole? Sycophants do not change, they remain ass kissers their whole life and I suppose they would go back to the latter because they don't think for themselves. Others do their thinking for them. Its funny, I wrote a book years ago, published it and in my book I state exactly that information can get out of black holes. Now that Hawking has got all the sycophants salivating, I can prove that I am smarter than Hawking? Hardly, the sycophants don't reconize original thinkers, because you have to climb the sycophantic kiss arse ladder in order to be accepted. Thats what Marxist/Leninist wanted when they founded their communist system, which the United Nations has embraced and it seems every sycophantic university and college out there. I love making sycophants my personal lab rats. It is fun to watch them salivate when I ring the bell. Hawking said it and recanted, but its ok...he's kissed enough asses along the way. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Aunt Buffy wrote: This is my view of the situation. Hawking said one thing. Other scientists disagreed. Each put forward his "proof". Scientists poured over the proofs and some stated their opinions. On the topic of information escape from a black hole...opinions were divided. Seems dualistic enslavement exists even in the scientific community. Yet why the perceived 'breakthroughs' are always met with almost complete hostility? Science is basically stifled because open ended thinking is insulted. i.e., How dare you ask an original question, what are you stupid, etc. etc. Skeptics are extremely hostile with no degrees of freedom to even question. Face reality skeptics don't ask very many questions because they are too afraid to be insulted, great way to 'teach' a new generation of astronomers and cosmologists. NOT! The new generation of discovery is not being led by academia, period. Skeptics dont push the envelope, period. This thinking is destroying our civlization because it affects all levels of how we order society. Society is doomed to failure and ultimate extinction or be replaced by something better, producing true longevity instead of 'black hole' end periods. Much of the worlds problems right now..rest upon the shoulders of our scientists. If they don't willingly change as a collective, and admit their mistakes and coverups, and ask the Higher Intelligence for help, I suppose that the fall of these "masters of the universe" will be great, but not without effecting all life on earth. But it's not just about how good a scientist your are in your own head...it's also about how good you are at explaining yourself to your peers and to the layman. There are lots of the former but its the latter that get heard. I have no problem with that at all. Explanation is far removed from things like the BB model. Especially when you consider Life and its Divine origins. "Yoda" wrote in message news If we say information can not get out of a blackhole now, we are supposedly wrong because Hawking admitted he wrong. That is being a little bit sycophantic to the nth degre. At one time if you said there were many dimensions, you were called a kook by ofcourse the wannabe thinker sycophants. At one time if you said there were other star systems with planets, you were called a kook and loon. Until they were discovered....now all the sycophants agree together that there are other planets. If you suggestd that light is not the fastest speed in the universe..you were called moron, idiot, kook, loon..etc. Now ofcourse its "acceptable" to suggest that. Hawking is just another sycophant with a whole troup following behind him, applauding as he goes. He was wrong before, what if he changes his mind again? Will the world go back to saying information can't get out of a black hole? Sycophants do not change, they remain ass kissers their whole life and I suppose they would go back to the latter because they don't think for themselves. Others do their thinking for them. Its funny, I wrote a book years ago, published it and in my book I state exactly that information can get out of black holes. Now that Hawking has got all the sycophants salivating, I can prove that I am smarter than Hawking? Hardly, the sycophants don't reconize original thinkers, because you have to climb the sycophantic kiss arse ladder in order to be accepted. Thats what Marxist/Leninist wanted when they founded their communist system, which the United Nations has embraced and it seems every sycophantic university and college out there. I love making sycophants my personal lab rats. It is fun to watch them salivate when I ring the bell. Hawking said it and recanted, but its ok...he's kissed enough asses along the way. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
This is my view of the situation.
Hawking said one thing. Other scientists disagreed. Each put forward his "proof". Scientists poured over the proofs and some stated their opinions. On the topic of information escape from a black hole...opinions were divided. But it's not just about how good a scientist your are in your own head...it's also about how good you are at explaining yourself to your peers and to the layman. There are lots of the former but its the latter that get heard. "Yoda" wrote in message news If we say information can not get out of a blackhole now, we are supposedly wrong because Hawking admitted he wrong. That is being a little bit sycophantic to the nth degre. At one time if you said there were many dimensions, you were called a kook by ofcourse the wannabe thinker sycophants. At one time if you said there were other star systems with planets, you were called a kook and loon. Until they were discovered....now all the sycophants agree together that there are other planets. If you suggestd that light is not the fastest speed in the universe..you were called moron, idiot, kook, loon..etc. Now ofcourse its "acceptable" to suggest that. Hawking is just another sycophant with a whole troup following behind him, applauding as he goes. He was wrong before, what if he changes his mind again? Will the world go back to saying information can't get out of a black hole? Sycophants do not change, they remain ass kissers their whole life and I suppose they would go back to the latter because they don't think for themselves. Others do their thinking for them. Its funny, I wrote a book years ago, published it and in my book I state exactly that information can get out of black holes. Now that Hawking has got all the sycophants salivating, I can prove that I am smarter than Hawking? Hardly, the sycophants don't reconize original thinkers, because you have to climb the sycophantic kiss arse ladder in order to be accepted. Thats what Marxist/Leninist wanted when they founded their communist system, which the United Nations has embraced and it seems every sycophantic university and college out there. I love making sycophants my personal lab rats. It is fun to watch them salivate when I ring the bell. Hawking said it and recanted, but its ok...he's kissed enough asses along the way. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
This is my view of the situation.
Hawking said one thing. Other scientists disagreed. Each put forward his "proof". Scientists poured over the proofs and some stated their opinions. On the topic of information escape from a black hole...opinions were divided. But it's not just about how good a scientist your are in your own head...it's also about how good you are at explaining yourself to your peers and to the layman. There are lots of the former but its the latter that get heard. "Yoda" wrote in message news If we say information can not get out of a blackhole now, we are supposedly wrong because Hawking admitted he wrong. That is being a little bit sycophantic to the nth degre. At one time if you said there were many dimensions, you were called a kook by ofcourse the wannabe thinker sycophants. At one time if you said there were other star systems with planets, you were called a kook and loon. Until they were discovered....now all the sycophants agree together that there are other planets. If you suggestd that light is not the fastest speed in the universe..you were called moron, idiot, kook, loon..etc. Now ofcourse its "acceptable" to suggest that. Hawking is just another sycophant with a whole troup following behind him, applauding as he goes. He was wrong before, what if he changes his mind again? Will the world go back to saying information can't get out of a black hole? Sycophants do not change, they remain ass kissers their whole life and I suppose they would go back to the latter because they don't think for themselves. Others do their thinking for them. Its funny, I wrote a book years ago, published it and in my book I state exactly that information can get out of black holes. Now that Hawking has got all the sycophants salivating, I can prove that I am smarter than Hawking? Hardly, the sycophants don't reconize original thinkers, because you have to climb the sycophantic kiss arse ladder in order to be accepted. Thats what Marxist/Leninist wanted when they founded their communist system, which the United Nations has embraced and it seems every sycophantic university and college out there. I love making sycophants my personal lab rats. It is fun to watch them salivate when I ring the bell. Hawking said it and recanted, but its ok...he's kissed enough asses along the way. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Yoda" wrote in message
news Its funny, I wrote a book years ago, published it and in my book I state exactly that information can get out of black holes. Now that Hawking has got all the sycophants salivating, I can prove that I am smarter than Hawking? OK, I'll bite. What's the title of your book Yoyo??? Hardly, the sycophants don't reconize original thinkers, because you have to climb the sycophantic kiss arse ladder in order to be accepted. Thats what Marxist/Leninist wanted when they founded their communist system, which the United Nations has embraced and it seems every sycophantic university and college out there. I love making sycophants my personal lab rats. It is fun to watch them salivate when I ring the bell. Hawking said it and recanted, but its ok...he's kissed enough asses along the way. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Yoda" wrote in message
news Its funny, I wrote a book years ago, published it and in my book I state exactly that information can get out of black holes. Now that Hawking has got all the sycophants salivating, I can prove that I am smarter than Hawking? OK, I'll bite. What's the title of your book Yoyo??? Hardly, the sycophants don't reconize original thinkers, because you have to climb the sycophantic kiss arse ladder in order to be accepted. Thats what Marxist/Leninist wanted when they founded their communist system, which the United Nations has embraced and it seems every sycophantic university and college out there. I love making sycophants my personal lab rats. It is fun to watch them salivate when I ring the bell. Hawking said it and recanted, but its ok...he's kissed enough asses along the way. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Yoda" wrote in message
news At one time if you said there were many dimensions, you were called a kook by ofcourse the wannabe thinker sycophants. At one time if you said there were other star systems with planets, you were called a kook and loon. Until they were discovered....now all the sycophants agree together that there are other planets. If you suggestd that light is not the fastest speed in the universe..you were called moron, idiot, kook, loon..etc. Now ofcourse its "acceptable" to suggest that. So you see... science marches on.... but you remain a k00k and a loon. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Yoda" wrote in message
news At one time if you said there were many dimensions, you were called a kook by ofcourse the wannabe thinker sycophants. At one time if you said there were other star systems with planets, you were called a kook and loon. Until they were discovered....now all the sycophants agree together that there are other planets. If you suggestd that light is not the fastest speed in the universe..you were called moron, idiot, kook, loon..etc. Now ofcourse its "acceptable" to suggest that. So you see... science marches on.... but you remain a k00k and a loon. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Yoda" wrote in message news If we say information can not get out of a blackhole now, we are supposedly wrong because Hawking admitted he wrong. That is being a little bit sycophantic to the nth degre. I don't understand your gripe. Hawking had a theory and he now believes he incorrectly evaluated the information. Uh, he was wrong. He is human, he makes mistakes. And BTW, let us not forget we're still talking theory here, so it is possible he is wrong about being wrong and is actually right. We don't know yet. snip Its funny, I wrote a book years ago, published it and in my book I state exactly that information can get out of black holes. Now that Hawking has got all the sycophants salivating, I can prove that I am smarter than Hawking? Hardly, the sycophants don't reconize original thinkers, because you have to climb the sycophantic kiss arse ladder in order to be accepted. Thats what Marxist/Leninist wanted when they founded their communist system, which the United Nations has embraced and it seems every sycophantic university and college out there. snip ISBN please? We'd love to check your book out. BV. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
Quantum Entanglement and FTL information transfer | Greysky | Misc | 81 | June 9th 04 07:11 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |