A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Expanding Universe



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 3rd 08, 05:34 AM posted to alt.astronomy
George Perez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Expanding Universe

Can someone explain how astronomers have concluded that the expansion of the
universe is accelerating.

Redeye


  #2  
Old November 3rd 08, 07:02 AM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Expanding Universe

On Nov 2, 9:34 pm, "George Perez" wrote:
Can someone explain how astronomers have concluded that the expansion of the
universe is accelerating.

Redeye


Supposedly the further distant stars are offering a greater redshift,
and otherwise supposedly nothing that's way out there is in blueshift.

However, there's certainly a great deal of dark matter in between that
could be affecting those subjective notions, or perhaps the stars
furthest away are simply more massive and thus causing their very own
gravity redshift.

NGC 1569 is in blueshift at -104 km/s.

M31/Andromeda is in blueshift at -300 km/s

http://www.physlink.com/Education/askExperts/ae384.cfm
"There are about 100 known galaxies with blueshifts out of the
billions of galaxies in the observable universe."

~ BG
  #3  
Old November 4th 08, 01:53 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Timberwoof[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default Expanding Universe

In article
,
BradGuth wrote:

On Nov 2, 9:34 pm, "George Perez" wrote:
Can someone explain how astronomers have concluded that the expansion of the
universe is accelerating.

Redeye


Supposedly the further distant stars are offering a greater redshift,
and otherwise supposedly nothing that's way out there is in blueshift.


"Supposedly"? After the starts were measured by hundreds or thousands of
astronomers, you claim it's "supposedly"?

However, there's certainly a great deal of dark matter in between that
could be affecting those subjective notions,


Precise measurements of redshift are "subjective notions"?

or perhaps the stars
furthest away are simply more massive and thus causing their very own
gravity redshift.


Probably not. If they were more massive, they'd be hotter and brighter.
And that difference would suggest some change in the evolution of stars.

For some reason your subjective notions are better than those from
people who actually study astronomy.

NGC 1569 is in blueshift at -104 km/s.

M31/Andromeda is in blueshift at -300 km/s

http://www.physlink.com/Education/askExperts/ae384.cfm
"There are about 100 known galaxies with blueshifts out of the
billions of galaxies in the observable universe."


They're also pretty close.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
People who can't spell get kicked out of Hogwarts.
  #4  
Old November 4th 08, 07:18 AM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Expanding Universe

On Nov 3, 5:53 pm, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,

BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 2, 9:34 pm, "George Perez" wrote:
Can someone explain how astronomers have concluded that the expansion of the
universe is accelerating.


Redeye


Supposedly the further distant stars are offering a greater redshift,
and otherwise supposedly nothing that's way out there is in blueshift.


"Supposedly"? After the starts were measured by hundreds or thousands of
astronomers, you claim it's "supposedly"?

However, there's certainly a great deal of dark matter in between that
could be affecting those subjective notions,


Precise measurements of redshift are "subjective notions"?


Yes, at least until some one objectively nails Dark Matter and
possibly Dark Energy.


or perhaps the stars
furthest away are simply more massive and thus causing their very own
gravity redshift.


Probably not. If they were more massive, they'd be hotter and brighter.
And that difference would suggest some change in the evolution of stars.

For some reason your subjective notions are better than those from
people who actually study astronomy.


I've never claimed my subjective notions were the one and only word of
God, much less of any Republican Zionist/Nazi God.


NGC 1569 is in blueshift at -104 km/s.


M31/Andromeda is in blueshift at -300 km/s


http://www.physlink.com/Education/askExperts/ae384.cfm
"There are about 100 known galaxies with blueshifts out of the
billions of galaxies in the observable universe."


They're also pretty close.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot comhttp://www.timberwoof.com
People who can't spell get kicked out of Hogwarts.


As far as we know with any objective certainty, as of 10 billion years
ago the expanding universe came to a bloody halt, or even having long
before revered itself. The best science data we've got about our
universe is clearly outdated by 13.5 billion years, if not by a whole
lot more. In other words, how much fudge factor would you like?

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
  #5  
Old November 4th 08, 01:23 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Expanding Universe

Redeye My Concave & Convex theory gives the answer why space between
the galaxies is expanding at an accelerating rate. We see this very
clearly viewing the red shifting of light. TreBert

  #6  
Old November 4th 08, 01:52 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Painius Painius is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,144
Default Expanding Universe

"George Perez" wrote...
in message ...

Can someone explain how astronomers have concluded that the expansion of
the universe is accelerating.

Redeye


'Lo Redeye --

In 1998 observations of Type Ia supernovae
suggested that the expansion of the universe is
speeding up...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernovae

Models attempting to explain accelerating
expansion include some form of dark energy:
cosmological constant, quintessence, or phantom
energy, with the latest WMAP data favoring the
cosmological constant...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S.: "A little bad taste is like a nice dash of paprika."
Dorothy Parker


P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net


  #7  
Old November 4th 08, 02:01 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Saul Levy Saul Levy is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 21,291
Default Expanding Universe

Does the color change, BEERTbrain? lmao!

Nope.

Saul Levy


On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 08:23:38 -0500, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

Redeye My Concave & Convex theory gives the answer why space between
the galaxies is expanding at an accelerating rate. We see this very
clearly viewing the red shifting of light. TreBert

  #8  
Old November 5th 08, 02:15 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default Expanding Universe

Cactus saul If its possible to get this through your low wit brain I
will tell you once again. The DOPPLER SHIFT of the spectral lines
towards the RED end of the spectrum show to us that galaxies are moving
away from us. That the further away the galaxy is from us the greater
its REDSHIFT(that is the faster it was moving away) This relationship
tells us that the universe is expanding and that means it had a definite
beginning at a certain moment in time. Well Saul I could go on and
on,but please try to let this information get into your thick scull.
Think man think TreBert

  #9  
Old November 5th 08, 05:05 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Expanding Universe

On Nov 4, 5:23 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Redeye My Concave & Convex theory gives the answer why space between
the galaxies is expanding at an accelerating rate. We see this very
clearly viewing the red shifting of light. TreBert


What about dark matter (carbon black diamond) that's not expanding?

~ BG
  #10  
Old November 5th 08, 05:08 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Expanding Universe

On Nov 4, 5:52 am, "Painius" wrote:
"George Perez" wrote...

in ...



Can someone explain how astronomers have concluded that the expansion of
the universe is accelerating.


Redeye


'Lo Redeye --

In 1998 observations of Type Ia supernovae
suggested that the expansion of the universe is
speeding up...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernovae

Models attempting to explain accelerating
expansion include some form of dark energy:
cosmological constant, quintessence, or phantom
energy, with the latest WMAP data favoring the
cosmological constant...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S.: "A little bad taste is like a nice dash of paprika."
Dorothy Parker


P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net


Most if not all of dark matter(carbon black diamond) is not forever
expanding and speeding up, unless there's an area or cosmic realm of
the electrostatic force of repulsion taking place.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Universe is expanding? G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 6 August 15th 08 06:24 AM
What is expanding with the universe? nightbat Misc 0 August 7th 05 06:03 PM
Expanding universe? kjakja Misc 122 October 15th 04 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.