|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with'no return ticket'
Jim Oberg wrote:
Despite the inherent danger, the Soyuz became the only hope to return Bowersox, Budarin, and Pettit home." A scenario I would like to have seen: "This is Mission Control. Bowersox, Budarin, and Pettit, we have great news for you! You won't have to ride that old-fashioned Soyuz! Even though the Columbia just disintegrated, and we're nowhere close to fixing that design flaw, we think we can ready another Shuttle for you very soon and send it up to rescue you!" "Oh, yeah? On second thought--we've decided we're going to ride the Soyuz. Thanks anyway." :-) -- Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
My favorite is the book where the X-1 gets dropped off the B-52 mothership. I know it's old, but not quite _that_ old. :-) (Can you imagine the effect on Japanese morale if a squadron of those had shown up over Tokyo?) Pat LOL...They were pretty upset when the B two nine showed up (BEESONS) they use to call them...the 52 would have been a real shock... Well said. Robert |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with'no return ticket'
David Spain wrote: There are worser :-) spell checkers out there. I particularly find noteworthy those that tell you it's spelled wrong but *don't* provide alternatives. sattelite no satalite no satellitite no This is supposed to be the advanced form of Mozilla, which in itself is supposed to be the advanced form of Netscape Mail. I have contacted Thunderbird regarding the perceived shortcomings I have found in its spell check program. The communication read something like this: "U sucking Dior knobs, if id waited sum sorted forum off a Beatrix spill chick pogrom, id wood have requisitioned it's." Pat |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with'no return ticket'
Brian Gaff wrote:
Over here we call that type of sensationalism, 'over egging the pudding'. :-) Brian That's for sure. They made it sound like the men up there were stranded with, say, only a few hours of oxygen or some such and were thus in serious danger.... |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
"Borderline" wrote:
My favorite is the book where the X-1 gets dropped off the B-52 mothership. I know it's old, but not quite _that_ old. :-) (Can you imagine the effect on Japanese morale if a squadron of those had shown up over Tokyo?) Pat LOL...They were pretty upset when the B two nine showed up (BEESONS) they use to call them...the 52 would have been a real shock... B-San, not Beeson. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
Jeff Findley wrote:
Yea, that Soyuz is so bad it's safety record is essentially statistically identical to the shuttle's. Is it time for that argument again already? -- "Checking identity papers is a complete waste of time. If anyone can be counted on to have valid papers, it will be the terrorists". |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket'
Mary Pegg wrote in
: Jeff Findley wrote: Yea, that Soyuz is so bad it's safety record is essentially statistically identical to the shuttle's. Is it time for that argument again already? Nope. The argument is settled; Jeff is correct. -- JRF Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail, check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and think one step ahead of IBM. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Too Far From Home (WAS: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space...)
I read the bad reactions here to the USA Today review and
sensationalized jacket blurb on this thread when it came up in March, but I was still intrigued enough to pick up this book recently, and I have to say, as a space layman, I've quite enjoyed it. To enjoy it yourself though, you do first need to get past the elephant in the room: The Expedition Six crew were never, of course, "stranded," and author Chris Jones admits as much, while still ludicrously overplaying the dangers of the crew's Soyuz lifeboat. (Even at that though, Jones includes some harrowing stories of rarely- discussed near-disasters on earlier Soyuz flights.) But once I got past the silliness of the "stranded" bit - which in any case doesn't take up that much space, and which somehow feels as if it's been played up at the urging of an editor - I found the book to be a pretty rollicking tale, containing some of the best-ever descriptions of the sights, sounds, tastes, smells, and actual feeling of life on a space station. Salyut, Skylab, and Mir all get great discussions too, and Jones' account of the oxygen generator fire and Progress collision onboard Mir are especially hair-raising. The retelling of unplanned and off-target ballistic reentry of Expedition Six' Soyuz will also definitely hold your attention. "Too Far" also shares many of the same strengths, and weaknesses, of other mass-market space books, especially those of Jones' most obvious inspiration, Tom Woolf's "The Right Stuff," which differentiate these accounts from inside-baseball tales of former NASA employees. Most notably, technical matters are sometimes garbled, glossed-over, or flat-out exaggerated. And even here, there have been insider tales full of gobbledygook, like that lamentable Gordon Cooper book where he went on about space aliens and cover-ups. (BTW, I noticed that obituary writers were uniformly kind in not mentioning *that* thing when Cooper passed away.) On the upside, like Woolf, Jones seems to have a hell of a lot of fun in his telling, and as an outsider, gets to be much more indiscreet in discussing the various personalities involved. For example, it's hoot read about old-school "astronaut socials," sixties holdovers which still sometimes raise their Brylcreemed heads in southern Houston. Invitations can even specify "church dress," which is something that is probably intuitively obvious to the wives of the traditional test- pilot astronaut types. But to the spouses of the diverse and crowded astronaut class of 1996, the term "church dress" meant what, exactly? Writes Jones of their conundrum: "No one wanted to stand out, at least for the wrong reasons, and that included their wives showing too much tit." Also enjoyable are the the many pages devoted to the definitely not- from-the-same-old-cookie-cutter science officer of Expedition Six, Don Pettit, and to his wife Micki. I remember watching him on NASA TV during his mission, and frequently wondered to myself, "Who the hell is this guy?" At least on the space-to-ground loops, he seemed to have a slight lisp, and on a nutty-professor air about him. It seems from this book that what you see is what you get: Pettit comes off as a brilliant tinkerer, probably one with more than a touch off A.D.D., and it was a series of happy accidents that landed him on ISS during that fateful mission. Pettit's bride, Micki, also breaks the mold of the prototypical astronaut wife. Who couldn't love a woman who shouts "Go you ****er! Go, go, go!" as the shuttle carrying her husband finally lifts off; and who - on what she thought was a private home video-conference with her orbiting husband - playfully flashes him a bit of titty, only to get a message the next day from NASA "technicians," advising her that she may want to check the security of her bathrobe before the start of the next video-conference with her husband. So I'm gonna give "Too Far From Home," a qualified, if quite enjoyable, thumbs up. Now my question. I'm an airline pilot. And like most people who have some knowledge of a specialized technical field, I find myself picking apart news stories, books, and movies having to do with my field of knowledge, commercial aviation in my case, always saying to myself things like "They wouldn't really do/say/act like that," or simply "That's wrong." (The movie "United 93" being one big exception.) Unfortunately, I'm just a space enthusiast, and not an expert, so to those on the list who are and who may have read this book, I'm wondering if you might enlighten me on some of the technical errors in Jones book, outside of the obvious and previously mentioned "stranded" thing. I just finished it and don't' want to commit to memory any stories with no or little basis in fact. Thanks in advance! On Mar 20, 1:51 am, "Jim Oberg" wrote: [JimO: I suspect that I don't 'recall' this fact because -- well, it's not and never was a 'fact'...grin] USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket' Book review: "A smart read. The narrative is lively and informed.. [Few Americans] recall that the [Columbia] tragedy strand[ed] two U.S. astronauts and one Russian cosmonaut aboard the International Space Station. For nearly six months and 250 miles above Earth, they had no return ticket." Too Far From Home: A Story of Life and Death in Space, By Chris Jones Doubleday, 284 pp., $24.95... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Too Far From Home (WAS: USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space...)
Thanks, Landings! Strong argument for
more attention to this work. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA Today: Columbia disaster stranded three men in space with 'no return ticket' | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 29 | May 3rd 07 12:16 PM |
Phil Chien has book on Columbia disaster | Jim Oberg | Space Shuttle | 5 | April 24th 05 02:38 AM |
Columbia disaster...nearing one year | x24val | Misc | 0 | January 21st 04 01:01 AM |
Same attitude at the International Space University [was Cause of Columbia Shuttle Disaster.] | SA Sam Thigpen | Policy | 4 | September 10th 03 09:36 PM |
TV REVIEW: 'COLUMBIA: FINAL MISSION'- Unheeded Concerns and the Columbia Disaster | Lynndel Humphreys | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 7th 03 01:50 PM |