|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
Hi.
I have just built my first telescope. Most of the parts I got from University Optics, the secondary from Newport Glass and the primary from ebay. It is a 6" f5 scope. I used Newt to get the measurements. Tonight I aimed it at the moon and could not get it to come to focus. I can see a large black blob in the center of the FOV from the secondary. I am thinking that the primary is not really f5 as advertised. Do any of the gurus agree? If not, what could be the problem? The reason I think it might be the primary is it was only, like, 35 bucks. It is the weakest link, except for perhaps the builder. g On a similar vein, how can I tell the focal ratio of the primary? (This isn't my first scope, this is just the first scope that I built.) Thanks for your help! -Phil www.pickupcentral.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
Phil wrote:
Hi. I have just built my first telescope. Most of the parts I got from University Optics, the secondary from Newport Glass and the primary from ebay. It is a 6" f5 scope. I used Newt to get the measurements. Tonight I aimed it at the moon and could not get it to come to focus. I can see a large black blob in the center of the FOV from the secondary. I am thinking that the primary is not really f5 as advertised. Do any of the gurus agree? If not, what could be the problem? The reason I think it might be the primary is it was only, like, 35 bucks. It is the weakest link, except for perhaps the builder. g On a similar vein, how can I tell the focal ratio of the primary? (This isn't my first scope, this is just the first scope that I built.) Thanks for your help! -Phil www.pickupcentral.com Hi Sounds like you have the secondary set in the wrong position here. It either needs to be moved forward, or backward in relation to the primary. I *think* it needs to be moved towards the primary. -- AM http://sctuser.home.comcast.net CentOS 4.2 KDE 3.3 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
Point the primary at the horizon in the daytime. Use a business card to find the focus, which will be an upside-down image of the horizon. Measure the distance. If your are only a little off you may be able to get away with moving the primary mirror cell fore or aft. Make sure this distance is in the middle of your focuser range after allowing for the position of your typical ocular (use your oculars like a magnifier of your finger tip, will be up in the barrel). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
Ya, you got one of those china mirrors and they can range from f4 to f5+, I
don't know every little bit, but after building my scope I know a little. You need to figure out just what the F of the mirror is, can be done in daylight with the sun and a yard stick ot tape. That's how I figured what mine was. -- The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord Sidewalk Astronomy www.sidewalkastronomy.info Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net In Garden Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden Blast Off Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/starlords "Phil" wrote in message . com... Hi. I have just built my first telescope. Most of the parts I got from University Optics, the secondary from Newport Glass and the primary from ebay. It is a 6" f5 scope. I used Newt to get the measurements. Tonight I aimed it at the moon and could not get it to come to focus. I can see a large black blob in the center of the FOV from the secondary. I am thinking that the primary is not really f5 as advertised. Do any of the gurus agree? If not, what could be the problem? The reason I think it might be the primary is it was only, like, 35 bucks. It is the weakest link, except for perhaps the builder. g On a similar vein, how can I tell the focal ratio of the primary? (This isn't my first scope, this is just the first scope that I built.) Thanks for your help! -Phil www.pickupcentral.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
"Phil" wrote in message . com... Hi. I have just built my first telescope. Most of the parts I got from University Optics, the secondary from Newport Glass and the primary from ebay. It is a 6" f5 scope. I used Newt to get the measurements. Tonight I aimed it at the moon and could not get it to come to focus. I can see a large black blob in the center of the FOV from the secondary. I am thinking that the primary is not really f5 as advertised. Do any of the gurus agree? If not, what could be the problem? The reason I think it might be the primary is it was only, like, 35 bucks. It is the weakest link, except for perhaps the builder. g On a similar vein, how can I tell the focal ratio of the primary? (This isn't my first scope, this is just the first scope that I built.) Thanks for your help! -Phil www.pickupcentral.com Hi Phil, you might try setting up a quick Foucault tester (just a lit pin hole and a knife edge) to get 1, an overall figure of your mirror. 2, the exact focal length. F5 can mean, as others have pointed out, anything from F4.5 to F5.5 :-( As even an inch in the wrong direction can stop you reaching focus it might be worthwhile. Newt is great but it doesn't know the focal plane of your eyepiece/camera. I had to trim my F6.1 truss tubes by an inch to get things just right. -- John Carruthers http://mysite.freeserve.com/jc_atm/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
Phil wrote:
Hi. I have just built my first telescope. Most of the parts I got from University Optics, the secondary from Newport Glass and the primary from ebay. It is a 6" f5 scope. I used Newt to get the measurements. Tonight I aimed it at the moon and could not get it to come to focus. I can see a large black blob in the center of the FOV from the secondary. I am thinking that the primary is not really f5 as advertised. Do any of the gurus agree? If not, what could be the problem? Almost certainly it is nominally f5 +- 20% .... Easy way to measure radius of curvature by holding a pin on axis at looking into the mirror. Inifinity focus is half this distance. Or quick and dirty find where it focusses a distant horizon or streetlamp. The reason I think it might be the primary is it was only, like, 35 bucks. It is the weakest link, except for perhaps the builder. g On a similar vein, how can I tell the focal ratio of the primary? Measure it! Regards, Martin Brown |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
SWell, I did the flashlight-and-a-piece-of-paper trick, and got a
measurement of about 42 1/2 inches. So, according to everything I have read, my focal length is a shade over 21". Swell. f3.5. I wanted a rich-field scope, but this is a little extreme! -Phil www.pickupcentral.com "Phil" wrote in message . com... Hi. I have just built my first telescope. Most of the parts I got from University Optics, the secondary from Newport Glass and the primary from ebay. It is a 6" f5 scope. I used Newt to get the measurements. Tonight I aimed it at the moon and could not get it to come to focus. I can see a large black blob in the center of the FOV from the secondary. I am thinking that the primary is not really f5 as advertised. Do any of the gurus agree? If not, what could be the problem? The reason I think it might be the primary is it was only, like, 35 bucks. It is the weakest link, except for perhaps the builder. g On a similar vein, how can I tell the focal ratio of the primary? (This isn't my first scope, this is just the first scope that I built.) Thanks for your help! -Phil www.pickupcentral.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
Phil wrote:
SWell, I did the flashlight-and-a-piece-of-paper trick, and got a measurement of about 42 1/2 inches. So, according to everything I have read, my focal length is a shade over 21". Swell. f3.5. I wanted a rich-field scope, but this is a little extreme! -Phil www.pickupcentral.com Wow! That's remarkable. I'd be very curious to see how the figure on the mirror is. You can make a slitless tester for only a couple of bucks and a couple hours of work. Here's a URL that describes it: http://www.jlc.net/~force5/Astro/ATM...ultTester.html You can quickly get an idea of how good the mirror is by using this thing. If you are interested and have any questions, drop me an email at chills at mail dot utexas dot edu. good luck - that's a mighty fast little telescope. Chris |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
ATM Follies / problems
"Phil" wrote in message om... SWell, I did the flashlight-and-a-piece-of-paper trick, and got a measurement of about 42 1/2 inches. So, according to everything I have read, my focal length is a shade over 21". Swell. f3.5. I wanted a rich-field scope, but this is a little extreme! -Phil www.pickupcentral.com That sounds rather short Phil, you are probably right but a typical mirror might be more toward F7, but then you've measured it and I haven't even seen it. Many moons ago the 6" F7 was "the" amateur telescope :-) they were made in their hundreds. An F3.5 sounds like it may have been made by an amateur for a special purpose. Any idea how old it is ? sometimes they're etched on the back, I always do mine, finish date, F length, fraction of wave etc. -- John Carruthers http://mysite.freeserve.com/jc_atm/ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Problems with Problems with the Orion Spacecraft #1. | bombardmentforce | History | 5 | September 29th 05 03:01 PM |
Problems with Problems With The Orion Spacecraft #3 | bombardmentforce | History | 0 | September 28th 05 09:26 PM |
NASA PDF - Apollo Experience Reports - 114 reports | Rusty | History | 1 | July 27th 05 03:52 AM |
kookdancers digest | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 43 | July 25th 05 10:20 PM |
TMI Report:People problems vs. Equipment | Jim M Bowden | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 22nd 03 08:08 AM |