|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pento Valev vs. Banesh Hoffmann
On Dec 17, 6:01 pm, Uncle Ben wrote:
Our french friend Pento Valev tries to catch relativists expressing reservations or even regrets at having accepted the basics of Special Relativity. He often quotes the well-known Baneesh Hoffmann, a friend and collaborator of Einstein, in what Pento describes as Hoffmann's "confession": [Hoffmann said] “Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether." Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was plagiarizing on the works of physicists who had accepted the existence of the Aether in electromagnetism. The nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar really had no idea what he was plagiarizing on. What a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar! shrug For instance, if it is so obvious, how could it turn out to be part of a revolution--especially when the first principle is also a natural one? Nonsense, the second principle was already a postulate of Woldemer Voigt almost 20 years before the plagiarized works of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. shrug http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woldemar_Voigt In that, Voigt did not feel like invoking the principle of relativity as a necessity in explaining the null results of the MMX, and he was right. Even Larmor’s transform (the closest form and concept to the Lorentz transform) does not satisfy the principle of relativity. shrug [Hoffmann continued] "If it was so obvious, though, why did he need to state is as a principle?” Because Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was nothing but a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. shrug [Hoffmann continued] “Because, having taken from the idea of light waves in the ether the one aspect that he needed, he declared early in his paper, to quote his own words, that 'the introduction of a" luminiferous ether" will prove to be supefluous.' " Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was indeed a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar to say **** like that. shrug [Hoffmann continued] "We see in all this the workings of an extraoordinary intuition. The beautiful thing about Einstein's cunningly chosen pair of principles is that each by itself seems harmless, yet the two together form an explosive mixture destined to rock the foundations of physics. ... " This is the first time in history that two fvcking groundless assumptions are celebrated into divinity. Gee! Just how fvcking said is that? shrug The list describing Einstein Dingleberries are growing all thanking the inputs from Einstein Dingleberries themselves. shrug ** FAITH IS LOGIC ** LYING IS TEACHING ** NITWIT IS GENIUS ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE ** FICTION IS THEORY ** PARADOX IS KOSHER ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION ** BULL**** IS TRUTH ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE ** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY ** HANDWAVING IS REASONING ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS ** FRAUDULENCE IS VERIFICATION ** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY ** INTERPRETATION IS FACT shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can someone explain - because Valev refuses to! | Ogle dataminer | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 29th 10 04:05 PM |
What does Pentcho Valev hope to achieve? | Martin Nicholson | Astronomy Misc | 1 | July 29th 10 10:01 PM |
What are Mr Valev’s qualifications as a scientist? | ukastronomy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 16th 09 10:40 AM |
DEDUCTIVE SCIENCE: VALEV REFUTED | ukastronomy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 12th 09 09:40 AM |
Three questions for Pentcho Valev | ukastronomy | Astronomy Misc | 36 | September 5th 08 11:08 AM |