|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass
The GUESS "negative mass" is NOT REAL, either.
There is NO REAL EARth - Sun mass, or Sun - EARth mass. A calculated DiFFERENCE between two mass is NOT *REAL* mass. Are we distinguishing the SAME "UNphysical" mass.?!! Yours, La PoEsy of "UNphysical" Equivalent SYNONYMs, eh.?!! Can you fit tacyons in the following general SPACE equation.? [BH gps.wpd]; BLACK HOLE Blue Stars & accretion discs GUESS BH observer to Blue Star AMBiENCE is assessed, as follows: PREAMBLE: AMBiENT DENSiTY actually refracts VELOCiTY c.!! VELOCiTY c is a MATHEMATiCAL constant, like pi.!! You can ONLY c c CONSTANT ..in the EQUATiON, c.!! The AMBiENT density CANNOT be addressed in GR-Tivity, so c gets "PEGGED".!! Subsequent ERROR is SPACEtime CURVATURE.!! [ This is the SAME SiTUATiON as with the PiONEER ANOMALY.!! ] You will assume an ambient DENSiTY GRADiENT, as per the following; ( BLACK HOLE Blue Stars & accretion disc factor analysis ): For GPS, this equation gives ATOMiC clock PREset FACTOR = _________ = (Very Low ~ BLUE STAR Orbit period tb) / (t1 - tb) = BH observer radius AMBiENT density / STAR's orbital density d3 = (OBSERVERs ambient PARTiCLE COUNT/m^3) / STAR's orbital COUNT/m^3 = ( _________ molpart/m^3) / ( __________ molpart/m^3) = (v1^2 - vb^2) / 2*c^2 = (rA*gA - r3*g3) / 2*c^2 = G*M1*[{1/(n1 - 1)*rA} - {1/(n3 - 1)*r3}] / c^2 (fA - fb) / fb = [{G*M1 / {(n1 - 1)*rA}} - {G*M1 / {(n3 - 1)*r3}}] / c^2 = (Stuckless rS)*[{1 / (n1 - 1)*rA} - {1 / (n3 - 1)*r3}] / 2 .!! 1. Radii rA and r3 MORE relevant to BH BLUE STARs THAN velocity, vb. 2. CAViTY n=0 only & always in GR & Newton Tivity (BOTH no AMBiENT). 3. The BOTTOM line, of the above EQUATiON, is ALL you NEED to SOLVE. 4. The ABOVE equation gives --what would have to be the SYNONYMOUS atomic-clock-PRE-set FACTOR for *NO ANOMALY*, at OBSERVER radius rA. M1 = Mass of EARth (or SUN, Pioneer, BLACK HOLE's example, as here). G = Gravitational Constant. r3 = radius of STARs or rocket VLO. (or STAR orbit radius, as here). rA = radius of orbiting clock's orbit. (..OBSERVERs DiSTANCE, here). v1 = 2*pi*rA/t1 = orbital speed of orbiting OBSERVER. (..Etc ..etc). vb = 2*pi*r3/t3 = speed of the EARth clock (BLACK HOLE frame). v1^2 = rA*g = (vescape)^2 / 2*(n - 1) = G*M1 / (n - 1)*rA [ m1*c/h=nL/wl=fL/c=pL/h=nA/2*pi*rA=eV/h*fA*rA=pA/h*rA ].!! The GUESS ambient density is ADDRESSED, with (n - 1), as follows: G*M1/(n - 1)=G*M1*m1/(mD - m1)=r1*v1^2=r1^2*g=nA*wl*v1^2/ 2*pi*nL [ ..whe c = wl*f / nL = 2*pi*r1 / nA*tbob = 1 / Uo*Eo*c ].!! 1. Fine Structure VARiABLE (n - 1) = (mD - m1) / m1 ,.. ..where mD is EQUiVALENT ambient DisCHARGE mass from m1 ..and where (n) = mD / m1 ..provides the + or - sign. 2. For BLACK HOLE M1 each Blue Star, m1, has a CAViTiY n. 3. HERE the observer is on the OUTside of the BLUE STARs. 4. GUESS 3-d Stuckless rS was Schwartzchild radius in GR. Go c WordPerfect file [BH gps.wpd] & c, pi-Like Go c COSmic reLiEF U_o c GUESS nomenclature Go c info itsy-bitsy bytes PLANCK TEMPERATURE . BLACK HOLE blue star discs result DiRECTLY from factor c^2/f_b. [ The GUESS Kinematic ViSCOSiTY & DiFFUSiON "ambience" FACTOR. ] Typos, *ViSCOSiTY* & *assessed*, CORRECTED.!! Thanks Ken.!! Physics USED TO BE hard, but GUESS simplified all THAT.!! Go c below, iAN.!! And you FORGOT to dot your i.!! Go c info itsy-bitsy bytes . ```Brian wrote: Imaginary mass is tacyons. Jack Sarfetti has been talking for some time about a warp drive. I would like to highlight the paradoxes of Faster than Light (FTL) travel in any shape of form. Basically FTL can, by looking at different frames of reference imply travel back in time. This is often stated in the form of the Grandfather paradox which states that you cannot go back and kill your grandfather. If we have only particles (tachyons) FTL the consistency principle can be maintained by the use of Feynman diagrams. In a historical epoch the tachyons will be near their ground state and so will have little perceived effect. They will not have no effect because tachyons will set up and preserve a timeline. Large chaotic departures from equilibrium will cause a departure from the ground state. On the other hand if we have FTL with spaceships of any description the paradox is there. Let us consider 2 wormholes whose mouths are 1000 light years apart. Let us assume that they can be traversed instantly and the mouths are stationary wrt. each other. Wormholes by the way are not black holes they are open structures which are stabilized by negative energy. Now let us cansider another pair of wormholes, also 1000ly apart which are traveling from the first location to the second at a high speed. Our spaceship accelerates into this wormhole. It will go back in time. The astronauts are now perfectly free to kill their grandparents. If we have a network of wormholes then it will form an AETHER - horrible word. There is no contracdiction provided we do not constructs wormholes in a different frame. A warp drive is no different. The Enterprise first moves away from its destination using impulse power and then travels 1000ly under warp drive. We get the same paradox. These thought experiments should sow the seed of doubt in our minds as to whether or not it is possible to create negative energy. If we can apply warp drive in one FOR but not another it must mean either:- 1) Negative energy does not exist. 2) If it does it is moderated by tachyons. It is subject to tachyonic force. Negative mass/energy does not like the use of impulse drive. Impulse drive will cause tachyons to go to the distant parts of the Universe. 3) Exactly the same thing applies to wormholes. At t=0 there is no causation - by definition. Hence at the big bang negative mass was free to cause unlimited inflation. It cannot do the same thing now. Negative mass may occur at specific times in the history of the Universe because of curvature of branes in a fifth dimension, but this fifth dimension is not under our control. Similarly if we attempt to create negative energy by any method. Jack is talking about super conducting discs we will create tacyons, as tachyons are an integral part of negative mass. They must be because of causality considerations. The mathematics of wormholes is perfectly correct, as is Jack's on the torsion warp drive. Thus any violation of causality calls into question negative mass itself and its behavior. It would seem that if Inflation is indeed the true explanation of the Universe, tacyons must have played an integral role, ad may still do in terms of the expansion of the Universe. Is there anything in this? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass of the observable Universe | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 10 | July 6th 05 09:44 AM |
GRAVITATION AND QUANTUM MECHANICS | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 13th 04 03:17 AM |
GRAVITATIONAL MECHANICS AND MASS | GRAVITYMECHANIC2 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 9th 04 07:29 PM |
A brief list of things that show pseudoscience | Vierlingj | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 14th 04 08:38 PM |