Black holes disproven Now

Well here's SR 101:

cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1
1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c

Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and white
shift:

sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z
1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g

Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole
not virutal, quantum, or constant rate:

(t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2)
for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius

For which information exists in the partial differential:

dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=0
dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=c

Therefo

lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v,
sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z)

The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this
information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must exist
be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity
with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its
planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any
planet in the Milky Way). This is known as hyper-conductivity.

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info


"BURT" wrote in message
...
The energy shift to light revealed in Pound Rebka means infinite
energy shift to light for black hole horizons. Incoming light goes
infinitely blue shifted or infinitely energetic. While outgoing light
gets infinitely red shifted to zero energy.

Both these predictions for light's energy at any event horizon are
nonsense and disproves their existence.

Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour

Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
Well here's SR 101:

cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1
1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c

Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and
white shift:

sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z
1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g

Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any
black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate:


(t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S=
vt_1-d_G=vt_2)
for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius

For which information exists in the partial differential:


dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v
)csc(z)=0

dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v
)csc(z)=c

Therefo

lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v,

sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)
|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z)

The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this
information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must
exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in
duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will
collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year
which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). This is known
as hyper-conductivity.

Wow!
Here is SR debunking 101

The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber.

One line, I win.



Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that
do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance
in science.


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

On Jun 23, 5:02*am, "Spaceman"
wrote:
Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
Well here's SR 101:

cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1
1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c

Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. *Then gravitational black and
white shift:

sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z
1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g

Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any
black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate:

(t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S*=
vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius

For which information exists in the partial differential:

dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v
)csc(z)=0

dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v
)csc(z)=c

Therefo

lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v,

sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z*)
|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z)



The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. *Yet this
information is not in a black hole. *To get out this information must
exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in
duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will
collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year
which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). *This is known
as hyper-conductivity.

Wow!
Here is SR debunking 101

The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber.

One line, I win.


Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that
do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance
in science.


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

At the center of a mass gravity dops to zero therefore there is no
gravity inside a black hole. If there were gravity inside a black hole
it would push matter first at the speed of light and then faster past
the speed of light inside.

Black holes are disproven in that they make nonsense predictions.
Mitch Raemsch

And then, we'll... OK hardon, here's one, try thinking linearly before you
corrupt my document off whatever whimsical Wangian Eurpium normalization
becomes the next blacklist.

LINK: http://www.usag-ac.info/cgi-bin/view.cgi?id=326

I'll have to correct this as for all those exiles, don't keep us tuned by
such disinformation.

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info
wrote in message
...
On Jun 23, 5:02 am, "Spaceman"
wrote:
Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
Well here's SR 101:

cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1
1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c

Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and
white shift:

sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z
1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g

Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any
black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate:

(t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S*=
vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild
radius

For which information exists in the partial differential:

dz/dcos(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(w)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v
)csc(z)=0

dm/dcos(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(w)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(s)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v
)csc(z)=c

Therefo

lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v,

sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z*)
|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z)



The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this
information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must
exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in
duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will
collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year
which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). This is known
as hyper-conductivity.

Wow!
Here is SR debunking 101

The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber.

One line, I win.


Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that
do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance
in science.


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

At the center of a mass gravity dops to zero therefore there is no
gravity inside a black hole. If there were gravity inside a black hole
it would push matter first at the speed of light and then faster past
the speed of light inside.

Black holes are disproven in that they make nonsense predictions.
Mitch Raemsch

Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
And then, we'll... OK hardon, here's one, try thinking linearly
before you corrupt my document off whatever whimsical Wangian Eurpium
normalization becomes the next blacklist.

LINK: http://www.usag-ac.info/cgi-bin/view.cgi?id=326

I'll have to correct this as for all those exiles, don't keep us
tuned by such disinformation.

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info

Relativists can not think linearly without sucking on
thier "transform" lollipops.


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

On Jun 22, 11:34 pm, "Patrick Meuser-Bianca" pmeuser-bia...@usag-
ac.info wrote:
Well here's SR 101:

cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1
1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c

Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and white
shift:

sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z
1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g

Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any black hole
not virutal, quantum, or constant rate:

(t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2)
for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius

For which information exists in the partial differential:

dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=0
dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z)=c

Therefo

lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v,
sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z)

The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this
information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must exist
be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in duplex parity
with the Godel radius or the event horizon will collapse the star of its
planet of origin (even within one light year which is the maximum to any
planet in the Milky Way). This is known as hyper-conductivity.

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticisthttp://www.usag-ac.info

"BURT" wrote in message

...

The energy shift to light revealed in Pound Rebka means infinite
energy shift to light for black hole horizons. Incoming light goes
infinitely blue shifted or infinitely energetic. While outgoing light
gets infinitely red shifted to zero energy.

Both these predictions for light's energy at any event horizon are
nonsense and disproves their existence.

Mitch Raemsch; Falling light changes colour

Where's our public owned supercomputer simulations? (or don't the
regular laws of physics apply?)

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

On Jun 23, 3:05 pm, wrote:
On Jun 23, 5:02 am, "Spaceman"
wrote:



Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
Well here's SR 101:

cos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=1
1/sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=c

Electromagnetic red and blue shi[f]t. Then gravitational black and
white shift:

sin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))=z
1/sin(sgn(v)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(d)csc(z))=g

Which give us the Schartzchild radius and the Godel radius of any
black hole not virutal, quantum, or constant rate:

(t_1^2g/d)/z+z/(t_2^2g/d)-z+g=0-d_S=vt_1-d_G=vt_2!d_S=vt_1=(d_G=vt_2|d_S*=
vt_1-d_G=vt_2) for-each z=m, d_G:Godel radius, and d_S=Schartzchild radius

For which information exists in the partial differential:

dz/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(z)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v
)csc(z)=0

dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/sin^2(sgn(*v
)csc(z)=c

Therefo

lim z-0 lim m-0 f(z)+f(m)-f'(z)/mz=v,

sqrt(v+z^2)=(2dm/dcos(sgn(d)|csc(z)|)/cos^2(sgn(v)csc(m)))dsin(sgn(d)|csc(z*)
|)/sin^2(sgn(v)csc(z))^1/3+sqrt(c/micro*eplison),(m-z)

The black hole evaporates before anything is destroyed. Yet this
information is not in a black hole. To get out this information must
exist be symmetric, to enter the Schwartchild radius, it must be in
duplex parity with the Godel radius or the event horizon will
collapse the star of its planet of origin (even within one light year
which is the maximum to any planet in the Milky Way). This is known
as hyper-conductivity.

Wow!
Here is SR debunking 101

The clock malfunctioned and your ruler is rubber.

One line, I win.


Think about that, or forever be the history repeating dingalings that
do not know how to properly time things nor how to measure distance
in science.


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

At the center of a mass gravity dops to zero therefore there is no
gravity inside a black hole. If there were gravity inside a black hole
it would push matter first at the speed of light and then faster past
the speed of light inside.

Black holes are disproven in that they make nonsense predictions.
Mitch Raemsch

A zero gravity black hole interior seems doable. At least a reverse-
gravity BH core seems entirely logical.

Perhaps the black looking shell or sphere of a given BH is merely a
weird crust or layer of antimatter.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

So's local connectionism, the problem exists when there is a relative supply
of energy and there is any disinformation the equivalent mass of its
equivalent matter, there' alot from absolute zero to about one degree kelvin
that reflects this range, the exchange of heat for example in LaPlacian
entropy gives us much more than the Lwas of Thermodynamics as for Boyle and
Hooke, the 'spring' as you see is the recoil into such relativity as to each
locality where there is a critical density of heat and a critical volume of
plasma, these do not consist energy. The energy expended into a reaction is
the same mass of its reactant times the velocity of such matter about it and
one half of that is the knowledge. Such notion of knowledge then did not
exist. So is the conceptual equivalent of local connectionism to such
information that doesn't either anymore than what does not have knowledge
http://www.nytimes.com, there'd be report to the reform of physics that
this is allways as for what does not inform us as to the relationships that
had pre-existed to the momentum that such a statement, "energy can be
neither creat or destroyed" means the same oversights for what
understandings were prevented so then what energy was vented for every
pre-existent creation subtract all the shading to an understandable recovery
in such mass that reflects the difference, as past values would show the
same sort of patterns as the last resort of what we see now. Its a pity
such a subject is so disinformative. It's a damn crying shame that anyone
would want to capitalize an intangible subject like a person, yet all the
information relative to a person, has this power in which its use becomes
its misuse. That's what limits entropy and increases disease, as those
who've been committed against there will into technology for the proposition
of precessive acts that such phenomenon are indicative of people who don't
know their birth-time. See CPH Theory, even Hosein Javadi states a black
hole is born, yet not to this antic, even now these trends subsist to what
could be a stable incorproation of day-care for the stabilization of such
terrain for the reclamation of these media in conjunction with the layering
of the twenty seven dimensional momentum to return the moon to its original
orbit (as the proper techniques for these sort of operations have been
unsigned and linked to unauthorized access as so many connected to
fanandemics of misporportional certainty that we can safely say that there
is no discrete systems in linear space--linear time is the result of these
decommissions, as, less roll operations in existing software that is so
relative the hardware in order to inflict non-linear time for co-efficient
exlcusions. How so this does come to pass as even what ages have become the
divide of a greater repositorry for such 'repugnant' practices as the basis
for the deforestation where these snakes lie as like now, the ciritical mass
resists, for whatever plots on the territories of a fuure's market that
reflects each and every practice to get the whole contingent in this time,
back to where they came from as for the proclamation of universal law and
whateveer contradictions such information services claim are critical.

Brain washing. We'd see a return to Mars by the bounded ranging of this
very message the same as a map to get to Deimos, but whoso the relationship
between my progress and the means to effect is destruction continues to be
so evident. BTW, a hardon is a particle to the rise of Atlantis, by the
time we reognize it as the eight wonder of the world, there'd be that much
less ocean to walk on it. These targets for magnetic polar anti-tangets are
the culprits as is the magnetic reflection of hyper-conductivity. It
complements coolons that have curled the same neural information into
genetic helixes and strands that such lands suite as for the accounting of
all murderons and burnons in the development of para-forcal systems to these
techlogies that have been built to unsigned and unauthorized practices or
respects, could what the difference be to replace them...

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info


"Spaceman" wrote in message
...
Patrick Meuser-Bianca wrote:
And then, we'll... OK hardon, here's one, try thinking linearly
before you corrupt my document off whatever whimsical Wangian Eurpium
normalization becomes the next blacklist.

LINK: http://www.usag-ac.info/cgi-bin/view.cgi?id=326

I'll have to correct this as for all those exiles, don't keep us
tuned by such disinformation.

Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
Cyberneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info

Relativists can not think linearly without sucking on
thier "transform" lollipops.


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman