NEW THEORY FOR THE FORMATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM

Hi,


The sun was a red giant 4.6 billion years ago - the planets were born
from the solar wind of the red giant sun.

Evidences in support of this idea:

1. Short lived isotopes in the solar system. The Half life of
Calcium 41 is 0.1 million years. It cannot be that this isotope was
injected to the solar system from the outside. If it was produced by
external red giant or supernova it should decay before reaching the
solar system.
2. Chondrules are found in large amount in many meteorites. The
chondrues are condensate of silicate gas. Chondrules formation
requires a silicate gas to pass from a high temperature to a colder
temperature. This is found in red giants. The solar wind of the red
giant is hot near the star and colder far away. In the solar nebula
hypothesis the material is passing from a cold environment to a hot
one so the chondrules cannot form.

The idea that the sun was a red giant is absurd in the standard solar
model and the solar nebula hypothesis. Still, there are the above
evidences in the solar systems that support this idea.

For more details read the article:

http://www.philica.com/display_artic...article_id=210

http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/solarsystem.pdf


Here are some highlights of this theory:

1. The sun energy source is from magnetic fields from the
supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy.
2. The heat induced by the magnetic fields leads to high energy
collision between particle in the sun core that creates new particle
and increase the sun mass.
3. All the stars in the galaxy create new mass so the total mass and
the size of the galaxy is increasing.
4. The stars in the galaxy eject dust that freefall to the galactic
center supermassive black hole. Thorough the dynamo effect the
gravitational potential energy of the debris and dust is converted to
magnetic fields.
5. As the galaxy mass and size increase, globular clusters are
detached form the main galaxy to create new galaxies.
6. Galaxies spawn new galaxies and the total number of galaxies in
the universe increase.
7. The universe expands and accelerates from the increase in the
number of the galaxies.
8. The Big Bang cosmological model is replaced by a new cosmological
model that resembles the steady state theory.
9. stars grow gradually from conversion of energy to mass.
10. Stars are born from planets, they first grow by accretion and
then by conversion of energy to mass.
11. Stars fluctuate from main sequence to a red giant. When the
magnetic fields are strong the star is in the main sequence, when the
magnetic fields are weakened the star turn to a red giant.
12. The sun was a red giant 4.6 billions years ago.
13. The planets were created from the strong solar wind of the red
giant sun.


The sun was a red giant 4.6 billion years ago - the planets were born
from the solar wind of the red giant sun.

Abstract

How the solar system formed, is a puzzle that challenged scientists
for many centuries. The current accepted theory is the Solar Nebula
Hypothesis originated by Kant and Laplace in the 18th century. In
reference 1 it was suggested that the sun energy source is not fusion
but magnetic fields from the center of the galaxy. The Solar nebula
Hypothesis cannot coexist with a sun powered by magnetic fields. As
shown on reference 4, those magnetic fields create mass that slowly
increase the mass of the sun. The sun is growing not from dust from
the interstellar space but from synthesis of new particles in the sun
interior. The sun and the planets formed separately, the sun came
first and then the planets follow.
In the standard solar model stars are turned into red giants when the
hydrogen in their core is depleted and the energy production stop.
Stars do not work on fusion, but on magnetic fields, so they turn into
a red giant when their energy supply from the magnetic field is
stopped. Stars that have a very long Maunder minimum, for tens of
million of years, in which their stellar cycle is weak, will turn into
a red giant.
The exoplanet search programs found that stars with planets have
higher metallicity compared to stars without planets. The metallicity
of a star depends on its mass. Massive stars have higher pressure and
temperature in their core that increase the fusion rate of heavy
elements. Stars with planet, that show higher metallicity, had higher
mass in the past that created the high metallicity. They went through
a significant mass loss that decreased their mass but did not change
the high metallicity. Those stars significant mass loss occur when
they turned into red giants. Red giants have strong stellar wind that
disperses the star outer layers into interstellar space. This stellar
wind creates comets that form planets around the star. The high
metallicity of the sun indicates that it was a red giant. The solar
planets where born from the solar wind of the red giant sun. The solar
system shows many evidences in support of an ancient red giant sun.
The energy calculation in reference 4 suggests that stars are slowly
growing by converting the energy from the magnetic fields to mass. The
gradual mass increase indicates that more massive stars are also
older, so according to the standard solar model there is a mix up
between older and younger stars. Older stars are not the smaller stars
like red dwarfs but the heavier stars like blue giants. The idea that
stars are slowly growing from small sizes, and the fact that the
latest exoplanet search programs found large number of exoplanets,
leads to the conclusion that stars originate from planets. The
development steps leading to the creation of stars from planets
include: growth of the planet by cold accretion of comets and
asteroids; separation of the planet from the star; magnetic ignition
of the planet when it reaches the size of a brown dwarf; and growth of
the star by conversion of the energy from the magnetic fields to mass.

There is a calculation that show the amount of energy captured from
the magnetic fields.
http://philica.com/display_article.php?article_id=208
http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/EnergyCalculation.pdf

Regards,
Dan Bar-Zohar