A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Space Shuttle
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SS1 orbital parameters



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 29th 04, 07:20 PM
Allen Thomson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SS1 orbital parameters

From Jonathan's Space Report No. 529, 2004 Jun 28
http://www.planet4589.org/jsr.html

Nevertheless this is a historic moment, marking the real dawn
of commercial human spaceflight. The trajectory was highly
suborbital, with a perigee close to the center of the Earth -
inertial orbit parameters at apogee were about 6374 x 100 km
x 35.0 deg. The inertial velocity at apogee was probably at
most 0.3 km/s; if they had launched east instead of west they
would have reached 0.5 km/s. The velocity needed for orbit
at 100 km is 7.8 km/s, a big difference.
  #2  
Old June 29th 04, 09:33 PM
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SS1 orbital parameters


"Allen Thomson" wrote in message
om...
From Jonathan's Space Report No. 529, 2004 Jun 28
http://www.planet4589.org/jsr.html

Nevertheless this is a historic moment, marking the real dawn
of commercial human spaceflight. The trajectory was highly
suborbital, with a perigee close to the center of the Earth -
inertial orbit parameters at apogee were about 6374 x 100 km
x 35.0 deg. The inertial velocity at apogee was probably at
most 0.3 km/s; if they had launched east instead of west they
would have reached 0.5 km/s. The velocity needed for orbit
at 100 km is 7.8 km/s, a big difference.

So its basically a super X-15 then? Have they any plans for an orbital, or
at least a continent hopping design. In my view this is a very rudimentary
system, purely there to show it can be done, but then it already has been.

What is required for real public access, is some form of runway to space
system that does not rely on being carried up under another aircraft. You
also need some form of air breathing engines for loitering when you come
down, or you might have a problem if your trajectory is a bit off beam!

Brian

--

Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
Email:
__________________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________________





---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 27/06/2004


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
inflation st yle heat shield crew bail out Rob Mohr Space Shuttle 11 April 5th 04 03:35 AM
Need orbital elements at ET sep Ian J. E. Jordan Space Shuttle 1 April 2nd 04 07:38 PM
Boeing Establishes Orbital Space Program Office Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 0 November 3rd 03 10:23 PM
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 1 October 15th 03 12:21 AM
Shuttle vs ISS Orbital Debris Risk Chuck Stewart Space Shuttle 16 September 11th 03 02:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.