Climate change could cause mass exodus by mid century

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:31:14 PM UTC-4, FredKartoffel wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:42:53 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 11:33:46 AM UTC-4, SlurpieMcDoublegulp wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 7:31:03 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 3:05:42 PM UTC-4, SlurpieMcDoublegulp wrote:

slurp's post deleted

From now on, just provide a link rather than waste bandwidth and emit excessive CO2 with yet another of your insipid copy-and-paste "McArticles."

Yes massa. (bows)

If you think AGW is a serious problem and yet still post your ****, then you are being a big hypocrite. But we all knew that anyway. You need to do your part. Following my instructions is a great first step.

You would make a great dictator, yessa massa. (bows)

potato-head, you're probably yet another hypocritical warmingista. Or maybe just a sockpuppet?

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:46:31 PM UTC-4, wsne... wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:31:14 PM UTC-4, FredKartoffel wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:42:53 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 11:33:46 AM UTC-4, SlurpieMcDoublegulp wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 7:31:03 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 3:05:42 PM UTC-4, SlurpieMcDoublegulp wrote:

slurp's post deleted

From now on, just provide a link rather than waste bandwidth and emit excessive CO2 with yet another of your insipid copy-and-paste "McArticles."

Yes massa. (bows)

If you think AGW is a serious problem and yet still post your ****, then you are being a big hypocrite. But we all knew that anyway. You need to do your part. Following my instructions is a great first step.

You would make a great dictator, yessa massa. (bows)

potato-head, you're probably yet another hypocritical warmingista. Or maybe just a sockpuppet?

So it turns out that you are both a warmingista AND a sockpuppet.

Your parents must be so proud.

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 11:46:31 AM UTC-5, wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:31:14 PM UTC-4, FredKartoffel wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:42:53 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 11:33:46 AM UTC-4, SlurpieMcDoublegulp wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 7:31:03 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 3:05:42 PM UTC-4, SlurpieMcDoublegulp wrote:

slurp's post deleted

From now on, just provide a link rather than waste bandwidth and emit excessive CO2 with yet another of your insipid copy-and-paste "McArticles."

Yes massa. (bows)

If you think AGW is a serious problem and yet still post your ****, then you are being a big hypocrite. But we all knew that anyway. You need to do your part. Following my instructions is a great first step.

You would make a great dictator, yessa massa. (bows)

potato-head, you're probably yet another hypocritical warmingista. Or maybe just a sockpuppet?

Yasah Massa (bows deeply to superior dictator)

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:35:48 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:46:31 PM UTC-4, wsne... wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:31:14 PM UTC-4, FredKartoffel wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:42:53 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 11:33:46 AM UTC-4, SlurpieMcDoublegulp wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 7:31:03 AM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:
On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 3:05:42 PM UTC-4, SlurpieMcDoublegulp wrote:

slurp's post deleted

From now on, just provide a link rather than waste bandwidth and emit excessive CO2 with yet another of your insipid copy-and-paste "McArticles."

Yes massa. (bows)

If you think AGW is a serious problem and yet still post your ****, then you are being a big hypocrite. But we all knew that anyway. You need to do your part. Following my instructions is a great first step.

You would make a great dictator, yessa massa. (bows)

potato-head, you're probably yet another hypocritical warmingista. Or maybe just a sockpuppet?

So it turns out that you are both a warmingista AND a sockpuppet.

Your parents must be so proud.

Yes, your dictatorship, whatever you say. Lord love a duck, your wise council shall be forever heeded by all who worship at your feet.

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:35:48 PM UTC-5, wrote:

So it turns out that you are both a warmingista .

Just two factions - climate deniers and those who respect the truth of science. We know which one you hold dear.

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 3:05:56 PM UTC-4, FredKartoffel wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 12:35:48 PM UTC-5, wsne... wrote:

So it turns out that you are both a warmingista .

Just two factions - climate deniers and those who respect the truth of science. We know which one you hold dear.

Of course, -I- believe in the truth of science. You, on the other hand, by your blatant hypocrisy, show that you are denying that there -could- even be a problem. Your selfish actions do not match your empty words.

And now you hide behind ever-changing pseudonyms.

On Thursday, May 5, 2016 at 3:17:44 AM UTC-5, FredKartoffel wrote:
Scorching temperatures brought on by climate change could leave large swaths of the Middle East and North Africa uninhabitable by the middle of this century, a new study predicts.

Researchers at Germany's Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and The Cyprus Institute in Nicosia crunched the numbers and found that this area, a "climate change hotspot" where days of extreme heat have doubled since 1970, could soon be plagued by weather so brutal that it triggers a "climate exodus."

On the hottest of days, temperatures in North Africa and the Middle East can reach highs of around 109 degrees Fahrenheit, according to the findings.. But that figure could soar to 114 degrees by 2050, and 122 degrees by 2100 -- extremes the researchers say could have "important consequences for human health and society."

Study lead author Jos Lelieveld, director of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and a professor at The Cyprus Institute, says the change in climate could jeopardize the very existence of the area's 500 million inhabitants.

"Prolonged heat waves and desert dust storms can render some regions uninhabitable, which will surely contribute to the pressure to migrate," Lelieveld said in a statement.

1) the history of climate research, which shows innumerable denier claims to be totally imaginary

2) the human attribution data, both mass balance and isotopic, which leave virtually no room for doubt regarding the dominant causative factor, which are accepted by the global scientific community as part of the scientific consensus on climate change, and which rule out natural causes as a significant cause of currently observed changes

3) the data from several independent sources regarding that consensus, as well as statements by nearly every scientific society in the developed world, the absence of significant dissent among the same group of organizations, and finally, the virtual absence of dissent among active climate researchers

4) the total absence of scientifically plausible alternative theories to replace what so many insist is wrong

5) the refusal of supposed conservatives to accept either the concept of actual conservation or the concept of personal responsibility for the waste they (and all of us) dump into shared resources such as our atmosphere and the world ocean.

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 3:47:36 PM UTC-4, FredKartoffel wrote:

tripe deleted

Use your real name on this forum if you wish for your bull*** to be taken even halfway seriously, dumb****.

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 2:52:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 3:47:36 PM UTC-4, FredKartoffel wrote:

tripe deleted

Use your real name on this forum if you wish for your bull*** to be taken even halfway seriously, dumb****.

Tell me more about your degree in climate science. And what's your denier motive? To show everyone the extent of your ignorance?


Climate Facts:

1) the history of climate research, which shows innumerable denier claims to be totally imaginary

2) the human attribution data, both mass balance and isotopic, which leave virtually no room for doubt regarding the dominant causative factor, which are accepted by the global scientific community as part of the scientific consensus on climate change, and which rule out natural causes as a significant cause of currently observed changes

3) the data from several independent sources regarding that consensus, as well as statements by nearly every scientific society in the developed world, the absence of significant dissent among the same group of organizations, and finally, the virtual absence of dissent among active climate researchers

4) the total absence of scientifically plausible alternative theories to replace what so many insist is wrong

5) the refusal of supposed conservatives to accept either the concept of actual conservation or the concept of personal responsibility for the waste they (and all of us) dump into shared resources such as our atmosphere and the world ocean.

On Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 3:47:36 PM UTC-4, FredKartoffel wrote:


5) the refusal of supposed conservatives to accept either the concept of
actual conservation or the concept of personal responsibility for the waste
they (and all of us) dump into shared resources such as our atmosphere and the
world ocean.

Most conservatives have a lower CO2 footprint than you do, roland. (That IS your real name, right?)

So how are YOU demonstrating YOUR "concept of personal responsibility" for what YOU do to the "shared resources?" Do you buy "carbon indulgences" or what exactly? And buying "green energy" doesn't count. Using MUCH LESS energy, green or otherwise, -might-.

Put up or shut up, roland.