|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in one Earth year?
|
#72
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in oneEarth year?
From that website -
"However, if you were to photograph an outer planet over several weeks or months against a fixed reference point in the sky, such as this APOD picture of Mars you would be able to see this apparent motion. So, not only do the outer planets change their positions relative to the "fixed stars" as they orbit the Sun, they apparently wander back and forth as well. No wonder the Greeks called them "planets" ("wanderers"). http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap060422.html All this, of course, is due to our perspective from a moving Earth as it overtakes and passes the other planets." http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap060422.html I trust people to have the intelligence to follow the resolution for outer planetary perspectives which rely exclusively on relative speeds between the Earth and the outer planets using the stationary stellar field of stars as a gauge for relative motions - http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap011220.html Inner planetary retrograde resolution does not fit into a stationary stellar background and that is where 21st century graphics and imaging takes center stage as there is so much going on. The Earth's orbital input into the heliocentric perspective of the inner planets is twofold with one major component and one minor component. The minor component is that the point at which Venus and Mercury reach their greatest elongation from the Sun is either accelerated or delayed depending on whether the inner planets are about to approach the Earth or have already overtaken the planet. The major component supplied by the Earth is setting the Sun up as a central reference for the observed behavior of the inner planets and much beloved of astrophotographers in putting phases in proper context - http://www.popastro.com/images/plane...ary%202012.jpg There should be no need to drag observers into the 21st century in order to partition retrograde resolution by perspectives as we can actually see Venus and Mercury make a circuit of the Sun in the clearest possible form as they swing out and then back in front of the Sun and move in opposite ways to the background stars which is recognized in that wonderful graphic - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdFrE7hWj0A This is for people who can understand the perspectives and can later get into the forensics as to why the insight hasn't made it into wider circulation until now. The mediocre will never get it. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in one Earth year?
oriel36 wrote:
From that website - "However, if you were to photograph an outer planet over several weeks or months against a fixed reference point in the sky, such as this APOD picture of Mars you would be able to see this apparent motion. So, not only do the outer planets change their positions relative to the "fixed stars" as they orbit the Sun, they apparently wander back and forth as well. No wonder the Greeks called them "planets" ("wanderers"). http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap060422.html All this, of course, is due to our perspective from a moving Earth as it overtakes and passes the other planets." http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap060422.html I trust people to have the intelligence to follow the resolution for outer planetary perspectives which rely exclusively on relative speeds between the Earth and the outer planets using the stationary stellar field of stars as a gauge for relative motions - If only you had the intelligence to see that this conclusion does not require great intelligence because it's so obvious to those who don't suffer from your mental defects http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap011220.html Inner planetary retrograde resolution does not fit into a stationary stellar background and that is where 21st century graphics and imaging takes center stage as there is so much going on. The Earth's orbital input into the heliocentric perspective of the inner planets is twofold with one major component and one minor component. The minor component is that the point at which Venus and Mercury reach their greatest elongation from the Sun is either accelerated or delayed depending on whether the inner planets are about to approach the Earth or have already overtaken the planet. The major component supplied by the Earth is setting the Sun up as a central reference for the observed behavior of the inner planets and much beloved of astrophotographers in putting phases in proper context - http://www.popastro.com/images/plane...ary%202012.jpg There should be no need to drag observers into the 21st century in order to partition retrograde resolution by perspectives as we can actually see Venus and Mercury make a circuit of the Sun in the clearest possible form as they swing out and then back in front of the Sun and move in opposite ways to the background stars which is recognized in that wonderful graphic - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdFrE7hWj0A This is for people who can understand the perspectives and can later get into the forensics as to why the insight hasn't made it into wider circulation until now. The mediocre will never get it. Exactly! The mediocre will never understand the truth because they have no knowledge of the scientific method. However you will have to improve considerably before you reach the understanding of even the mediocre. Mediocrity is something to which you must aspire. But you will probably never get up to that level thanks to your overpowering arrogance and lack of empathy. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in oneEarth year?
The approach of Huygens and his contemporaries as accurate clocks started to appear creates a number of problems as the introduction of the 24 hour system formats observations into the familiar 365 day/ 366 day cycles hence the true correlation between rotations and orbital behavior is lost for each individual circuit of 365 1/4 days and rotations. It is a complicated issue that stumped everyone including the genuine objections at the time of the Galileo affair that the facility which predicts astronomical events cannot be used to prove the Earth's turns and moves through space.
The partitioning of perspectives between the inner and outer planets and the role the field of stars plays in dividing the perspectives by way of a moving Earth has a number of additional aids for resolving the motions of the planets as they move back and forth against the background stars. At the center of retrograde motions where the planets move with the annual motion of the stars behind the Sun, the Earth is closest to the planets in our respective orbits. In this case the outer planets are brightest at the center of retrogrades against the background field of stars - http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap141028.html In the case of the inner planet Venus, it is darkest at the center of retrogrades to the central Sun - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7U5VbasKr4 It can be argued that the grandstand view of the inner planets as they circuit the central Sun is just as fascinating as the relative speeds between the Earth and the outer planets which cause those slowing moving planets to temporarily fall behind in view, in either case people now have the entire narrative that didn't exist before. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in oneEarth year?
On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:01:57 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:54:41 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...rs-review-says Such incidents are crimes and should be reported to the police, not to the church. Except so many go undetected because the Church actively covers them up. How can something that is "undetected" then be covered up? How does the Church "actively cover them up?" The victims and their parents/guardians will still be aware of the crime and are free to report it to police. Covering up a crime would be an obstruction of justice, usually a crime in and of itself. How many are covered up? You need to provide percentages and absolute numbers. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in one Earth year?
|
#77
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in one Earth year?
wrote:
On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 2:01:57 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:54:41 -0700 (PDT), wsnell01 wrote: http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...rs-review-says Such incidents are crimes and should be reported to the police, not to the church. Except so many go undetected because the Church actively covers them up. How can something that is "undetected" then be covered up? How does the Church "actively cover them up?" The victims and their parents/guardians will still be aware of the crime and are free to report it to police. Covering up a crime would be an obstruction of justice, usually a crime in and of itself. How many are covered up? You need to provide percentages and absolute numbers. If you had followed the links in the article above you would have found this http://gu.com/p/3eqvq/sbl Your attitude of disbelief of such criticism of the church is common and helps to shield the perpetrators by preventing victims from talking and allowing the church to claim they are insane or, as the link stated "alcoholics" |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in oneEarth year?
The methods and insights of the original heliocentric astronomers depended on the motions of objects as they moved through the Zodiac as an extension of the geocentric framework which had the Earth at the center.
"Secondly, we see other revolutions as advancing in the opposite direction, that is, from west to east; I refer to those of the sun, moon, and five planets. The sun thus regulates the year for us, and the moon the month, which are also very familiar Periods of time. In like manner each of the other five planets completes its own orbit. Yet (these motions) differ in many ways (from the daily rotation or first motion). In the first place, they do not swing around the same poles as the first motion, but run obliquely through the zodiac. Secondly, these bodies are not seen moving uniformly in their orbits, since the sun and moon are observed to be sometimes slow, at other times faster in their course. Moreover, we see the other five planets also retrograde at times, and stationary at either end (of the regression). And whereas the sun always advances along its own direct path, they wander in various ways, straying sometimes to the south and sometimes to the north; that is why they are called "planets" (wanderers). " Copernicus, Chapter 4 , De Revolutionibus http://www.webexhibits.org/calendars...opernicus.html In terms of declination, the Sun was observed to move quickest nearer the Equinoxes and slowest at the Solstices (hence 'Sun stationary' ) and these observations are fun to consider even though they are now extraneous for 21st century purposes. An injection of mediocrity normally kills a thread and creates distractions but in this case there are huge pieces of a puzzle that can be assembled to create a very 21st century narrative that is easy to understand for those who venture out at twilight or dawn. Presently for those in the Western isles and elsewhere, the orbital motion of the Earth places the great star Sirius behind the Sun in a line-of-sight observation - http://earthsky.org/?p=3540 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeQwYrfmvoQ The Sun is set up as a central reference in that graphic which is then applied to the motion of the inner planets. It may be that there are less people around today who can appreciate the new split perspectives than there were in the 16th century who could appreciate what Copernicus did in accounting for outer planetary retrogrades but not inner planetary retrogrades even with superlative tools at our disposal. This insight is free of academic concerns and is open to all observers. In a few months Sirius and the great field of stars known as Orion will be in full view as the Earth moves around the Sun and those stars come into open view. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in one Earth year?
oriel36 wrote:
The methods and insights of the original heliocentric astronomers depended on the motions of objects as they moved through the Zodiac as an extension of the geocentric framework which had the Earth at the center. "Secondly, we see other revolutions as advancing in the opposite direction, that is, from west to east; I refer to those of the sun, moon, and five planets. The sun thus regulates the year for us, and the moon the month, which are also very familiar Periods of time. In like manner each of the other five planets completes its own orbit. Yet (these motions) differ in many ways (from the daily rotation or first motion). In the first place, they do not swing around the same poles as the first motion, but run obliquely through the zodiac. Secondly, these bodies are not seen moving uniformly in their orbits, since the sun and moon are observed to be sometimes slow, at other times faster in their course. Moreover, we see the other five planets also retrograde at times, and stationary at either end (of the regression). And whereas the sun always advances along its own direct path, they wander in various ways, straying sometimes to the south and sometimes to the north; that is why they are called "planets" (wanderers). " Copernicus, Chapter 4 , De Revolutionibus http://www.webexhibits.org/calendars...opernicus.html In terms of declination, the Sun was observed to move quickest nearer the Equinoxes and slowest at the Solstices (hence 'Sun stationary' ) and these observations are fun to consider even though they are now extraneous for 21st century purposes. An injection of mediocrity normally kills a thread and creates distractions but in this case there are huge pieces of a puzzle that can be assembled to create a very 21st century narrative that is easy to understand for those who venture out at twilight or dawn. Presently for those in the Western isles and elsewhere, the orbital motion of the Earth places the great star Sirius behind the Sun in a line-of-sight observation - http://earthsky.org/?p540 https://www.youtube.com/watch?vîQwYrfmvoQ The Sun is set up as a central reference in that graphic which is then applied to the motion of the inner planets. It may be that there are less people around today who can appreciate the new split perspectives than there were in the 16th century who could appreciate what Copernicus did in accounting for outer planetary retrogrades but not inner planetary retrogrades even with superlative tools at our disposal. This insight is free of academic concerns and is open to all observers. In a few months Sirius and the great field of stars known as Orion will be in full view as the Earth moves around the Sun and those stars come into open view. Sirius behind the Sun in one of sight? Wrong again! Sirius today: https://flic.kr/p/xABovq |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
How many degrees in their orbit do the planets travel in one Earth year?
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:29:48 -0700 (PDT), oriel36
wrote: In a few months Sirius and the great field of stars known as Orion will be in full view as the Earth moves around the Sun and those stars come into open view. Gemini, Orion, Taurus. All these "winter" constellations are currently prominent (and in "open view") in the hours before sunrise. And it's been two or three weeks since the heliacal rising of Sirius, so while still not prominent, it's easily seen in the pre-dawn sky. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Malthusian Theory and Travel Beyond Earth Orbit | Al Jackson | Policy | 13 | August 16th 03 02:47 AM |
Malthusian Theory and Travel Beyond Earth Orbit | John Maxson | Space Station | 1 | August 4th 03 02:49 AM |
Malthusian Theory and Travel Beyond Earth Orbit | John Maxson | Policy | 0 | August 3rd 03 07:39 PM |
Malthusian Theory and Travel Beyond Earth Orbit | John Maxson | Space Station | 3 | August 3rd 03 03:30 AM |
Malthusian Theory and Travel Beyond Earth Orbit | John Maxson | Policy | 3 | August 3rd 03 03:30 AM |