|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pluto can only be a planet
If Saturn and Jupiter's paths would cross, one would have to
disqualify one as a planet. And you would point at it and say the 6th one is smaller, one that orbits the Sun with countless Moons (Pluto has Moons), and so they say that one named Saturn is not a planet, good bye, vote took course in the British Parliament. If out Moon would separate from Earth, we would say that is the Moon that was once Earth's. A Jesus/Jew argument arises: Do you believe it is a planet. Half will say no, half will say yes. It becomes religion, and this is where Science is supposed to be more precise. Remember Pluto was 'voted out' by the Galactic Federation, and not taught according to scientific literatures which often have contradicting contents. Somebody felt they must make a vote, as the separation in the Galactic Federation needs government zoning protocols of designating secret scientific projects, which depend on the valuable designation protocol protocol protocol. Google is taking over the world with it's mind and corporate doggies they plan to take along the journey implying federation policies of culthood project dumb dumber bonehead, he he he did I say bonehead, he he he, look at Sergey Brin's pictu No planet/planet doesn't matter. He he he. He he he (a retard he, pronounce 'hat' without a t), somebody break out his teeth. Using 15 million books from libraries for profit without copyright is criminal invasion of international book libraries, stolen works of arts and humanities, as fascists in Nazi Germany 'just took' art from museums of countries they invaded, he he he. Criminal mob, Galactic Federation fascism overbourne under a Galactic Federation President not seeing pllitics is to avoid 80-90 percent of Arabs to think negatively of Americans as a result of the Iraq war. If Israel were to stay in Lebanon weeks after it cleaned up terrorist camps and not leave as Texas big brother who now orders riot policemen with riot helmets to stand in downtown Austin as in Tianenmen Square to symbolize religious intolerance against the same things China stood against, against the millions of Austin Friday night outgoers to downtown, standing there in militarily coordinated riot/fascist regime ready for anything to prove big government as a regime in the rise and permanencies in regards to the 1930's klan retaking all power, a 1930's klan that at the time was similarly demonstrating intolerance toward Italians who made their own wine, drank their own wine, therefore showing disrespect toward the same klan in power, while Bush fascisting the Arab culture with a model-Democracy concept erecting Iraq as a model for all Arab countries, a country better than Arabs, a modelistic KKK, the neo-CCCP evesdropping, watching over Americans as if Timothy McVeigh would have attacked with the whole American world, it can't be that low, a Nazi movement 'signaling for humanity corruptions and aspects of World War', Soros wrote about this militant separation and corruption of power, but Americans as always 'don't care', don't care about humanity, history, education and reelect a president with a crimes against humanity, so he makes order and can take security as a priority. Ceausescu sat and wrote in his office, while men stood on the hall motionlessly. In a country where security is the primary engagement of a President, he is pretty much a dictator. It is the fall of 20th century regime, the fall of the *no exception* occults, where as in North Korea 100 percent people wear two pins of their two great leaders at all times in the street occulting power to every corner of the society, *with no exception*. Purpose is taken to the extreme, as in the large suburb I live in, no cruising is allowed only purpose driving. Only allowed to go from one location to another, as was under the CCCP based on specific purpose. Friends who get together and want to go out driving can get arrested for cruising. Texas is a famous neighbor of Colorado.). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pluto can only be a planet
Basically what they are removing if they are removing Saturn with it's
moons, is they are removing a planet. (given Saturn's orbit would cross paths with Jupiter's) They are removing a planet. The sentence in itself uses the word planet. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pluto can only be a planet
Basically what they are removing if they are removing Saturn with it's
moons, is they are removing a planet. (given Saturn's orbit would cross paths with Jupiter's) They are removing a planet. The sentence in itself uses the word planet. Pluto has it's own self-defined course around the Sun. Pluto is a large round object with Moons, a course that crosses with Neptune's orbit. That's all a definition of a planet needs. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pluto can only be a planet
Basically what they are removing if they are removing Saturn with it's
moons, is they are removing a planet. (given Saturn's orbit would cross paths with Jupiter's) They are removing a planet. The sentence in itself uses the word planet. Pluto has it's own self-defined course around the Sun. Pluto is a large round object with Moons, a course that crosses with Neptune's orbit. That's all a definition of a planet needs. The word Planet is round. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pluto can only be a planet
On Jul 4, 11:48 am, gb6726 wrote:
Basically what they are removing if they are removing Saturn with it's moons, is they are removing a planet. (given Saturn's orbit would cross paths with Jupiter's) They are removing a planet. The sentence in itself uses the word planet. Pluto has it's own self-defined course around the Sun. Pluto is a large round object with Moons, a course that crosses with Neptune's orbit. That's all a definition of a planet needs. The word Planet is round. You know and I go with this over to sci.astro.research and they say I have no scientic basis, no references, no scientific research materials. It happens that they would rather kill than be susseptible. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pluto can only be a planet
On Jul 4, 11:51 am, gb6726 wrote:
On Jul 4, 11:48 am, gb6726 wrote: Basically what they are removing if they are removing Saturn with it's moons, is they are removing a planet. (given Saturn's orbit would cross paths with Jupiter's) They are removing a planet. The sentence in itself uses the word planet. Pluto has it's own self-defined course around the Sun. Pluto is a large round object with Moons, a course that crosses with Neptune's orbit. That's all a definition of a planet needs. The word Planet is round. You know and I go with this over to sci.astro.research and they say I have no scientic basis, no references, no scientific research materials. It happens that they would rather kill than be susseptible. It can only mean one thing: There is corruption in the high-academic institutions, not like that's an old things. Beaurocracy where it shouldn't be, I am not talking of the politburo sci.astro.research group. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Mexico Declares Pluto a Planet - Pluto Planet Day Set For March 13 | Jeff Findley | Policy | 0 | March 8th 07 08:59 PM |
Pluto has more moons than Charon, Hubble spots 'em. For me, this makes Pluto a planet, not just a KBO | D. Orbitt | Policy | 0 | November 1st 05 06:07 AM |