|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
Darla Interesting you have both the weak and strong forces combined in
your quark model. I have all the forces coming from the curvature of spacetime.(Einstein) I have tried to fit spacetime curve into the micro realm by using a powerful sharp curve the size of a Plank length. I call it simply a Planck curve. This is the first time I have ever posted this idea. My thinking stops when submicroscopic gets so very tiny,and then I have to think along the lines and loops of the string theory. Its all about relating. We think of a galaxy as a point since their size in relation to the whole universe as so extremely tiny. I also know Riemann's geometry has math.and this mass does not fit in the Quantum realm So you see Darla my thinking needs much more time. I would get the Nobel if I could work this out Bert |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Darla Interesting you have both the weak and strong forces combined in your quark model. I have all the forces coming from the curvature of spacetime.(Einstein) I have tried to fit spacetime curve into the micro realm by using a powerful sharp curve the size of a Plank length. I call it simply a Planck curve. This is the first time I have ever posted this idea. My thinking stops when submicroscopic gets so very tiny,and then I have to think along the lines and loops of the string theory. Its all about relating. We think of a galaxy as a point since their size in relation to the whole universe as so extremely tiny. I also know Riemann's geometry has math.and this mass does not fit in the Quantum realm So you see Darla my thinking needs much more time. I would get the Nobel if I could work this out Bert You will never get a Nobel if you pursue this 'fantasy' math. Stop thinking of gravity as a force. It's an effect. You're welcome. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 15, 6:17*am, "HVAC" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Darla *Interesting you have both the weak and strong forces combined in your quark model. I have all the forces coming from the curvature of spacetime.(Einstein) * I have tried to fit spacetime curve into the micro realm by using a powerful sharp curve the size of a Plank length. I call it simply a Planck curve. This is the first time I have ever posted this idea. *My thinking stops when submicroscopic gets so very tiny,and then I have to think along the lines and loops of the string theory. *Its all about relating. We think of a galaxy as a point since their size in relation to the whole universe as so extremely tiny. *I also know Riemann's geometry has math.and this mass does not fit in the Quantum realm *So you see Darla my thinking needs much more time. I would get the Nobel if I could work this out * Bert You will never get a Nobel if you pursue this 'fantasy' math. Stop thinking of gravity as a force. *It's an effect. You're welcome. At best it's certainly not a very strong force. It has become clear as to what we need to do in order to win a Nobel, is to expand a war as based upon bogus or irrational logic, as well as investing trillions because of a few tribal feuds by folks that are by our standards mostly extremely poor and of deeply religious types, that are simply tired of having been continually ****ed upon and taken advantage of by those of us that clearly do not believe in hell or any kind of benevolence, short of our providing a police state that'll never become a self-sustaining independent nation because of religions that simply insist upon disagreeing with one another, rather than joining forces in order to fight outside forces that are continually taking advantage of the situation. ~ BG |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 15, 3:42*am, "HVAC" wrote:
"Darla" wrote in message g.com... The quarks that make up the particles of an atom, think of them as "tame" quarks, rely upon the weak nuclear force. How do you catch a unique quark? Unique up on it! How do you catch a unique gluon? The tame way! Those crazy Rothschilds are just having fun. It's what they do for personal entertainment, especially since being in public is not a good option. ~ BG |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
HVAC I take no argument to you when you say "We feel the effects of
gravity" You thus have to understand to cause an "effect" takes a force Get the picture ? Or do you always wear a dunce hat? Bert |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... HVAC I take no argument to you when you say "We feel the effects of gravity" You thus have to understand to cause an "effect" takes a force Get the picture ? Or do you always wear a dunce hat? Bert It's probably that you are too old to understand. Gravity isn't a force. It's space's reaction to mass. I really can't put it into simpler terms.... Sorry. Question- Does Bert wear Boxers or briefs? Answer- Depends |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 13, 6:13*pm, "Darla" wrote:
What is actually manufactured constantly are quark-antiquark pairs. If enough energy is involved, these might then become as electron-antielectron pairs. It takes far less energy to produce q-aq pairs than it does to produce e-ae pairs. So there are q-aq pairs constantly appearing and then disappearing... If my description above raises questions, then "shoot". So.. you've drawn on the mainstream idea of sundry particle- antiparticle pairs popping into existance and disappearing. The unanswered question remains- popping into and out of *What*? Think of gas bubbles in solution doing the same (say, in the cavitation trail of a boat's propeller).Think of 'particles' as vacuoles or 'bubbles' in an underlying medium. oc |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 15, 6:17*am, "HVAC" wrote:
Stop thinking of gravity as a force. *It's an effect. Agreed. So what is the actual, literal mechanism *causing* the effect? General Relativity very eloquently describes the effects, but remains mute on the causal mechanism itself (and it ain't 'particle- antiparticle pairs' popping into and out of "nothing"). oc |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The gravitational field is what it is, not what you want it to be.
The gravitational field is what it is, not what you want it to be. It's pure “structure”, 4-D ( imagine that, if you can ), curvature. Net Net, all things considered, structure spontaneously dissipates. Lit or not, a cigarette eventually dissipates 'til its spent, gone. Same goes for stars, including their gravity fields. Bigger objects devolve into smaller, less predictable particles. The cosmos consumes only a PORTION of its fuel ( “exergy” ) at a time; so there's always some left, “life” ( i.e. consumption ) goes on. jeffrelf.f-m.fm/The cosmos consumes fuel, it's “alive”.jpg |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 15, 9:41*am, jughead wrote:
On Dec 13, 6:13*pm, "Darla" wrote: What is actually manufactured constantly are quark-antiquark pairs. If enough energy is involved, these might then become as electron-antielectron pairs. It takes far less energy to produce q-aq pairs than it does to produce e-ae pairs. So there are q-aq pairs constantly appearing and then disappearing... If my description above raises questions, then "shoot". So.. you've drawn on the mainstream idea of sundry particle- antiparticle pairs popping into existance and disappearing. The unanswered question remains- popping into and out of *What*? Think of gas bubbles in solution doing the same (say, in the cavitation trail of a boat's propeller).Think of 'particles' as vacuoles or 'bubbles' in an underlying medium. oc With ****faced Darla posting ****faced bogus topics and fraudulent subtopics, along with jibber-jabber replies to perfectly serious questions, as only the Rothschilds see fit; what do you expect? 99.9% of topics here in this and most every other public newsgroup are intentionally bogus or having been loaded with ulterior motives and hidden agendas to begin with. The few that are legit and thus benevolent can't be bothered with. So, what's their next big status quo plan of inaction and obfuscation to suit their ongoing ruse? ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What if (on Cosmic Chance) | Darla[_3_] | Misc | 11 | December 26th 09 05:01 AM |
What if (on Cosmic Chance) | Mark Earnest | Misc | 4 | December 14th 09 05:35 AM |
What if (on Cosmic Chance) | Double-A[_3_] | Misc | 2 | December 13th 09 12:23 AM |